Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.430 (2026)

Authority to make arrest in fresh pursuit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      133.430 Authority to make arrest in fresh pursuit. (1) Any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the ground that the person is believed to have committed a felony in the other state has the same authority to arrest and hold such person in custody as has any member of any duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of this state to arrest and hold in custody a person on the ground that the person is believed to have committed a felony in this state.

      (2) This section shall not be construed to make unlawful any arrest in this state which otherwise would be lawful.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1982–2017 · leading case: State v. Meyer, 53 P.3d 940 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Meyer, 53 P.3d 940 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 7× “ORS 133.430(1) provides: “Any member of a duly organized state, county, or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
State v. Kurtz, 249 P.3d 1271 (Or. 2011). · cites it 2× “10 Under ORS 133.430, out-of-state officers in fresh pursuit of a fleeing suspect have the same authority to arrest and hold the suspect as any Oregon police officer.”
State v. Bonds, 653 P.2d 1024 (Wash. 1982). “225 (law governing arrests by private persons); Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.430 (law governing fresh pursuit); Or.”
State v. Keller, 379 P.3d 545 (Multnomah Cty. Cir. Ct., O.R. 2016). · cites it 3× “Our inquiry thus reduces to whether Thompson’s lack of authority to stop defendant in Oregon, under the circumstances presented here, constitutes a violation of Article I, section 9, because the stop was “unreasonable.”
State v. Keller, 396 P.3d 917 (Or. 2017). “ORS 133.430(1) provides, “Any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
State v. Smith, 268 P.3d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 2011). “The Supreme Court concluded that such an arrest was proper, relying on both ORS 133.430 and WSTC 310.120. Id. at 79 n 10.”
State v. Keller (Or. 2017). “ORS 133.430(1) provides, “Any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 133.430(1) — 3 cases
State v. Meyer, 53 P.3d 940 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “ORS 133.430(1) provides: “Any member of a duly organized state, county, or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
State v. Keller, 396 P.3d 917 (Or. 2017). “ORS 133.430(1) provides, “Any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
State v. Keller (Or. 2017). “ORS 133.430(1) provides, “Any member of a duly organized state, county or municipal peace unit of another state of the United States who enters this state in fresh pursuit, and continues within this state in such fresh pursuit, of a person in order to arrest the person on the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.