Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.896 (2026)

Stay of criminal proceedings during period of agreement; limitation on stay; extension of stay

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

135.896 Stay of criminal proceedings during period of agreement; limitation on stay; extension of stay. (1) If the district attorney elects to offer diversion in lieu of further criminal proceedings and the defendant, with the advice of counsel, agrees to the terms of the proposed agreement, including a waiver of the right to a speedy trial, the court shall stay further criminal proceedings for a definite period. Except as provided in ORS 135.898 and subsection (2) of this section, the stay shall not exceed 270 days in the case of a defendant charged with commission of a felony, and shall not exceed 180 days in the case of a defendant charged with the commission of a misdemeanor. If the defendant declines diversion, the court shall resume criminal proceedings.

(2) Prior to the end of the stay of criminal proceedings described in subsection (1) of this section, the defendant may request that the district attorney approve an extension of the stay for a period up to 270 days in the case of a defendant charged with the commission of a felony and up to 180 days in the case of a defendant charged with the commission of a misdemeanor. If the district attorney approves the extension, the district attorney shall notify the court and the court shall order an extension of the stay of criminal proceedings for the approved period of time. [1977 c.373 §4; 2010 c.25 §3; 2015 c.258 §1]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1982–1987 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Harmon v. Blanding, 644 P.2d 1082 (Or. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State Ex Rel. Harmon v. Blanding, 644 P.2d 1082 (Or. 1982). · cites it 3× “” ORS 135.896 provides that if the parties agree to diversion, “the court shall stay further proceedings for a definite period.”

State v. Vest, 744 P.2d 288 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). ““(b) If the defendant did not qualify for the diversion agreement under the criteria in ORS 813.210.” (Emphasis supplied.) ORS 135.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.