Or. Rev. Stat. § 136.430
Civil laws of evidence in criminal trials; exceptions
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
136.430 Civil laws of evidence in criminal trials; exceptions. The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and criminal procedure. [Formerly 136.510]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1975–2009 · leading case: State v. Suttles
State v. Suttles (1979)
“040(l)(a) is applicable to criminal trials, it is made so by ORS 136.430, which provides: "The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions or proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and…”
State v. Suttles (1979)
“040(1)(a) is applicable to criminal trials, it is made so by ORS 136.430, which provides: "The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions or proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and…”
State v. Marshall (1991)
“ORS 136.430; OEC 101(1), (2). In this case, the first issue is whether the witness’ testimony, about whether there is any particular kind of lie which the victim has a reputation for telling, is character evidence.”
State v. Hovies (1994)
“) ORS 136.430 provides: “The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and criminal procedure.”
State v. Hubbard (1983)
“ORS 136.430. The evidence offered by defendant is not of any statement or conduct of Brose.”
State ex rel. Hathaway v. Hart (1984)
“ORS 136.430. Defendant was denied none of these rights.”
State v. Allen (1976)
“” ORS 136.430: "The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating crimes and criminal procedures.”
State v. Hollandsworth (1983)
“The sole question on appeal is whether the state is collaterally estopped from relitigating the driving issue in the second trial.”
State v. Johnson (1984)
“” At defendant’s trial for DWS, the material issues were whether he was driving at the time in question and whether his driver’s license was suspended or revoked.”
Timms v. Cupp (1979)
“It is true that ORS 136.430 provides: "The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and criminal procedure.”
State v. Santos (2009)
“" ORS 136.430 provides, "The law of evidence in civil actions is also the law of evidence in criminal actions and proceedings, except as otherwise specifically provided in the statutes relating to crimes and criminal procedure.”
State v. Nano (1975)
“” To ascertain the correctness of the court’s ruling, we first turn to ORS 136.430 ① which generally relates the laws of evidence in civil eases to criminal trials.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.