Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 136.695 (2026)

Evidence obtained in violation of ORS 136.675 or 136.685 inadmissible

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      136.695 Evidence obtained in violation of ORS 136.675 or 136.685 inadmissible. No evidence secured in violation of ORS 136.675 or 136.685 shall be admissible in any criminal proceeding in this state. [1977 c.540 §3]

 

      136.700 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §247; renumbered 136.485]

 

      136.710 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §248; renumbered 136.490]

 

      136.720 [Amended by 1973 c.836 §249; renumbered 136.495]

 

      136.730 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]

 

      136.750 [1993 c.379 §1; renumbered 153.805 in 1995]

 

      136.753 [1993 c.379 §2; renumbered 153.808 in 1995]

 

      136.756 [1993 c.379 §3; renumbered 153.810 in 1995]

 

PROCEDURE TO RELY ON ENHANCEMENT FACT AT SENTENCING

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1999 · leading case: State v. Trenary, 836 P.2d 739 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Trenary, 836 P.2d 739 (Or. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “" The first issue is whether Foust's violation of ORS 813.135 requires suppression of the test results.”
State v. Thompson-Seed, 986 P.2d 732 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). “ORS 136.695, similarly, declares the inadmissibility of evidence procured through hypnosis without complying with statutory conditions.”
State v. King, 733 P.2d 472 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “ORS 136.695 provides: No evidence secured in violation of ORS 136.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.