Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 137.230 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 137.260

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      137.230 Definitions for ORS 137.260. As used in ORS 137.260, “conviction” or “convicted” means an adjudication of guilt upon a verdict or finding entered in a criminal proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction. [1961 c.412 §1; 1987 c.158 §20]

 

      137.240 [Formerly 421.110; 1973 c.56 §1; 1973 c.836 §266; 1974 c.36 §2; repealed by 1975 c.781 §10]

 

      137.250 [Formerly 421.112; 1973 c.836 §267; repealed by 1975 c.781 §10]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–2013 · leading case: Vasquez v. Courtney, 537 P.2d 536 (Or. 1975).
Vasquez v. Courtney, 537 P.2d 536 (Or. 1975). · cites it 2× “The definition of “conviction” as it relates to the effect of a felony conviction on an individual’s civil rights is contained in ORS 137.230: “As used in ORS 137.230 to 137.”
State v. Gile, 985 P.2d 199 (Or. Ct. App. 1999). ““convicted” and “conviction” in ORS 137.230, ORS 161.725, and ORS 166.270, those definitions are expressly limited in application and do not constitute context for ORS 137.”
State v. Pettit, 675 P.2d 183 (Or. Ct. App. 1984). “When the challenge for cause was denied, defendant exercised a peremptory challenge, ORS 137.230, and the juror was excused. Defendant argues that he was prejudiced because he lost the use of a peremptory challenge and was then required to accept another juror who admitted to…”
State v. Smith, 691 P.2d 89 (Or. 1984). “The word “conviction” was defined in ORS 137.230 as meaning “an adjudication of guilt upon a verdict or finding entered in a criminal proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction.”
State v. Coughlin, 311 P.3d 988 (Or. Ct. App. 2013). “The first is “convicted”: Only the condition of having been “convicted” can lead to ineligibility under ORS 137.225(6)(b). No statute explicitly defines what “convicted” means for purposes of ORS 137.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.