153.005
Definitions. As
used in this chapter:
(1) “Enforcement
officer” means:
(a) A member of
the Oregon State Police.
(b) A sheriff or
deputy sheriff.
(c) A city
marshal or a member of the police of a city, municipal or quasi-municipal
corporation.
(d) A police
officer commissioned by a university under ORS 352.121 or 353.125.
(e) An
investigator of a district attorney’s office if the investigator is or has been
certified as a peace officer in this or any other state.
(f) An
investigator of the Criminal Justice Division of the Department of Justice of
the State of Oregon.
(g) A Port of
Portland peace officer.
(h) A humane
special agent as defined in ORS 181A.345.
(i) A regulatory
specialist exercising authority described in ORS 471.775 (2).
(j) An authorized
tribal police officer as defined in ORS 181A.940.
(k) Any other
person specifically authorized by law to issue citations for the commission of
violations.
(2) “Traffic
offense” has the meaning given that term in ORS 801.555.
(3) “Violation”
means an offense described in ORS 153.008.
(4) “Violation
proceeding” means a judicial proceeding initiated by issuance of a citation
that charges a person with commission of a violation. [1999 c.1051 §2; 2007
c.71 §44; 2009 c.299 §3; 2011 c.506 §20; 2011 c.644 §§22,45; 2012 c.54 §§14,15;
2012 c.67 §§7,8; 2013 c.180 §21,22; 2015 c.174 §10; 2015 c.614 §§145,146]
Notes of Decisions
Hood River Cnty. v. Stevenson, 33 P.3d 325 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 4× “ORS 153.005. 3 A complaint issued pursuant to ORS chapter 153 generally requires “the enforcement officer [to] certify, under the penalties provided in ORS 153.”
State v. Pohle, 505 P.3d 475 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” In light of Greer and ORS 153.005, in construing “traffic offense” in ORS 137.”
State v. Benoit, 311 P.3d 874 (Or. 2013).
“*307 ORS 153.005(4) does not compel a different conclusion.”
City of Portland v. Huffman, 331 P.3d 1105 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).
“132 (providing that circuit courts have jurisdiction over alleged city ordinance violations); ORS 153.005 - 153.121 (providing rules for the trial and appeal of certain ordinance violations).”
City of Lowell v. Wilson, 105 P.3d 856 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“, violations of state law), see ORS 153.005(2); ORS 153.008. 17 In this instance, 18 the “particular controls over the general” maxim is instructive— and, indeed, conclusive: ORS 221.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.005(1) — 1 case
Hood River Cnty. v. Stevenson, 33 P.3d 325 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
“ORS 153.005. 3 A complaint issued pursuant to ORS chapter 153 generally requires “the enforcement officer [to] certify, under the penalties provided in ORS 153.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.005(2) — 2 cases
City of Lowell v. Wilson, 105 P.3d 856 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
“, violations of state law), see ORS 153.005(2); ORS 153.008. 17 In this instance, 18 the “particular controls over the general” maxim is instructive— and, indeed, conclusive: ORS 221.”
State v. Pohle, 505 P.3d 475 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).
“” In light of Greer and ORS 153.005, in construing “traffic offense” in ORS 137.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.005(4) — 1 case
State v. Benoit, 311 P.3d 874 (Or. 2013).
“*307 ORS 153.005(4) does not compel a different conclusion.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 153.005(l)(f) — 1 case
Hood River Cnty. v. Stevenson, 33 P.3d 325 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).
“ORS 153.005. 3 A complaint issued pursuant to ORS chapter 153 generally requires “the enforcement officer [to] certify, under the penalties provided in ORS 153.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.