Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.160 (2026)

Exclusion of defenses to criminal liability for conduct of another

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      161.160 Exclusion of defenses to criminal liability for conduct of another. In any prosecution for a crime in which criminal liability is based upon the conduct of another person pursuant to ORS 161.155, it is no defense that:

      (1) Such other person has not been prosecuted for or convicted of any crime based upon the conduct in question or has been convicted of a different crime or degree of crime; or

      (2) The crime, as defined, can be committed only by a particular class or classes of persons to which the defendant does not belong, and the defendant is for that reason legally incapable of committing the crime in an individual capacity. [1971 c.743 §14]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1975–2010 · leading case: Standefer v. United States, 447 U.S. 10 (1980).
Standefer v. United States, 447 U.S. 10 (1980). “03 (1979); Ore. Rev. Stat. § 161.160 (1979); Vt. Stat.”
State v. Pine, 45 P.3d 151 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “155, it is no defense that: "(1) Such other person has not been prosecuted for or convicted of any crime based upon the conduct in question or has been convicted of a different crime or degree of crime[.”
State v. Petry, 273 S.E.2d 346 (W. Va. 1980). “§ 702-225 (1976); Idaho Code § 19-1431 (1979); Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 274 § 3 (1970); Minn.”
State v. Rader, 228 P.3d 552 (Or. 2010). “ORS 161.160(2). However, it will become a Class C felony if, among other things: “The assault is committed in the immediate presence of, or is witnessed by, the person’s or the victim’s minor child or stepchild or a minor child residing within the household of the person or…”
State v. Flajole, 129 P.3d 770 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “125 (1971) (in “prosecution for an offense,” intoxication is not a defense to a criminal charge, but evidence that the defendant was intoxicated may be offered by the defendant whenever it is relevant to negative *301 an element of the crime charged); ORS 161.160 (1971)…”
State v. Schindler, 531 P.2d 915 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). “155 and ORS 161.160(1): “A person is criminally liable for the conduct of another person constituting a crime if with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the crime he solicits or commands such other *410 person to commit the crime.”
D'Amico v. Peterson, 754 P.2d 19 (Or. Ct. App. 1988). “The court expressly directs that final judgment be entered with respect to [petitioner’s] claims with respect to the imposition of the ORS 161.160 gun mininum and that the other claims in the Third Amended Formal Petition for Post-Conviction Relief be dismissed without prejudice.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.160(1) — 2 cases
State v. Pine, 45 P.3d 151 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “155, it is no defense that: "(1) Such other person has not been prosecuted for or convicted of any crime based upon the conduct in question or has been convicted of a different crime or degree of crime[.”
State v. Schindler, 531 P.2d 915 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). “155 and ORS 161.160(1): “A person is criminally liable for the conduct of another person constituting a crime if with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the crime he solicits or commands such other *410 person to commit the crime.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.160(2) — 1 case
State v. Rader, 228 P.3d 552 (Or. 2010). “ORS 161.160(2). However, it will become a Class C felony if, among other things: “The assault is committed in the immediate presence of, or is witnessed by, the person’s or the victim’s minor child or stepchild or a minor child residing within the household of the person or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.