Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.535

Classification of felonies

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      161.535 Classification of felonies. (1) Felonies are classified for the purpose of sentence into the following categories:

      (a) Class A felonies;

      (b) Class B felonies;

      (c) Class C felonies; and

      (d) Unclassified felonies.

      (2) The particular classification of each felony defined in the Oregon Criminal Code, except murder in any degree under ORS 163.107 or 163.115 and treason under ORS 166.005, is expressly designated in the section defining the crime. An offense defined outside this code which, because of the express sentence provided is within the definition of ORS 161.525, shall be considered an unclassified felony. [1971 c.743 §68; 2019 c.635 §16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: State v. Simonov
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Simonov (2016) or “005 spells out precisely which, provisions of the Oregon Revised Statutes may be cited as the “Oregon Criminal Code of 1971,” commonly referred to as the “Oregon Criminal Code” without the date.”
State v. Ferman-Velasco (1998) orctapp · cites it 4× “ORS 161.535. "The sentences to be imposed upon these different classifications are set forth in other statues and rules.”
State v. Rainoldi (2011) or “, ORS 161.535; ORS 161.555; ORS 161.665 (all referring to “the Oregon Criminal Code”).”
State v. Stalder (2006) orctapp “160(3); ORS 161.535(l)(c); ORS 161.605(3). As we also have noted, however, the trial court attempted to remedy that problem by adding to the judgment the note that the period of incarceration plus the period of post-prison supervision “shall not exceed 60 months.”
State v. Batty (1991) orctapp · cites it 2× “5 ORS 161.535 provides: “(1) Felonies are classified for the purpose of sentence into the following categories: “(a) Class A felonies; “(b) Class B felonies; “(c) Class C felonies; and “(d) Unclassified felonies.”
State v. Self (1985) orctapp “Defendant then argues: “The Solicitation statute, by referring to the classification of felonies and misdemeanors set out in the Oregon Criminal Code at ORS 161.535 and 161.555, and the consequent punishment sections of ORS 161.”
State Ex Rel. Redden v. Davis (1980) or “We conclude that on the prior occasion alleged in the indictment in the underlying case Eakin was charged with and convicted of an unclassified felony, ORS 161.535(l)(d). In its brief the relator has argued for that conclusion (although reaching it by a different line of…”
State v. McCormick (1986) orctapp “” 5 ORS 161.535 provides: “(1) Felonies are classified for the purpose of sentence into the following categories: “(a) Class A felonies; “(b) Class B felonies; “(c) Class C felonies; and “(d) Unclassified felonies.”
State v. Beck (2013) orctapp “See ORS 161.535, 161.555. The state acknowledges those facts, but argues that, although ORS 137.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.535(2) — 1 case
State v. Batty (1991) orctapp “5 ORS 161.535 provides: “(1) Felonies are classified for the purpose of sentence into the following categories: “(a) Class A felonies; “(b) Class B felonies; “(c) Class C felonies; and “(d) Unclassified felonies.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.535(l)(c) — 1 case
State v. Stalder (2006) orctapp “160(3); ORS 161.535(l)(c); ORS 161.605(3). As we also have noted, however, the trial court attempted to remedy that problem by adding to the judgment the note that the period of incarceration plus the period of post-prison supervision “shall not exceed 60 months.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 161.535(l)(d) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Redden v. Davis (1980) or “We conclude that on the prior occasion alleged in the indictment in the underlying case Eakin was charged with and convicted of an unclassified felony, ORS 161.535(l)(d). In its brief the relator has argued for that conclusion (although reaching it by a different line of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.