Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 166.005

Treason

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      166.005 Treason. (1) A person commits the crime of treason if the person levies war against the State of Oregon or adheres to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

      (2) No person shall be convicted of treason unless upon the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or upon confession in open court.

      (3) A person convicted of treason shall be punished by imprisonment for life. [1971 c.743 §217]

 

      166.010 [Repealed by 1971 c.743 §432]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1986–1996 · leading case: Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Umatilla County v. $18,005 in U.S. Currency (1996) orctapp “It appears as a note preceding ORS 166.005 and was set to be repealed on December 31, 1993.”
State v. Batty (1991) orctapp “115 and treason under ORS 166.005, is expressly designated in the section defining the crime.”
State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. Metz (1993) orctapp “It appears as a note preceding ORS 166.005, and stands to be repealed on December 31, 1993.”
Multnomah County v. One 1984 Chevrolet Corvette (1992) orctapp “It appears as a note preceding ORS 166.005. It stands repealed on December 31,1993.”
State v. McCormick (1986) orctapp “115 and treason under ORS 166.005, is expressly designated in the section defining the crime.”
State v. 132.85 Acres Located on Highway 395 (1992) orctapp “It authorizes and provides procedures for forfeiture of real and personal property “which is used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit or facilitate in any manner the commission of prohibited conduct.” Or Laws 1989, ch 791, §3(7).”
City of Hillsboro v. One Parcel of Real Property (1994) orctapp “The full text of Oregon Laws 1989, chapter 791, appears at the note preceding ORS 166.005 (1989).”
State v. Vettrus (1996) orctapp “The $40 was seized as evidence that tended to prove the female officer’s testimony that defendant had offered her $40 to engage in sexual conduct or contact.”
Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants (1996) or “The forfeiture statutes have not been codified in the Oregon Revised Statutes, but instead appear as a note within the criminal statutes at the beginning of ORS chapter 166, before ORS 166.005. Portions will be quoted later in this opinion at relevant points.”
Clackamas County v. 102 Marijuana Plants (1994) orctapp “It appears as a note preceding ORS 166.005 and was set to be repealed on December 31,1993.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.