Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185
Supplying contraband
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
ORSoregonlegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
162.185 Supplying contraband. (1) A person commits the crime of supplying contraband if:
(a) The person knowingly introduces any contraband into a correctional facility, youth correction facility or state hospital; or
(b) Being confined in a correctional facility, youth correction facility or state hospital, the person knowingly makes, obtains or possesses any contraband.
(2) Supplying contraband is a Class C felony. [1971 c.743 §194; 1983 c.815 §9; 1997 c.249 §48]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: State v. Tippetts
State v. Tippetts (2002)
“]” ORS 162.185(1)(a). 1 At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of supplying contraband.”
State v. Williams (1999)
“Defendant was charged with supplying contraband, ORS 162.185, after marijuana was discovered in his possession when he was being booked after being arrested for unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.”
State v. Lanier (2018)
“There, the state advanced the argument that the reason for the question was to ensure that the defendant did not bring contraband into the jail, thereby supplying contraband in violation of ORS 162.185. 3 Id. However, we reasoned that an arrestee who is in possession of…”
State v. Long (1992)
“ORS 162.185; ORS 162.135(l)(d). 1 He contends that the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer to the indictment.”
State v. Barnes (2013)
“2002), the defendant was charged with introducing “contraband into a correctional facility” in violation of Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185 . The majority argues that the Oregon statute is distinguishable from the statute in the present case.”
State v. Williams (1978)
“The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to an information charging him with the crime of supplying contraband, ORS 162.185, and the state appeals. The issue is whether the definition of contraband in ORS 162.”
State v. Thaxton (2003)
“992, and supplying contraband, ORS 162.185. He challenges only the conviction for supplying contraband.”
State v. Gonzalez (2003)
“ORS 162.185. Defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by concluding that he voluntarily introduced contraband into the Umatilla County Jail when, while in possession of methamphetamine, police took him there after arresting him.”
State v. Cole (2007)
“Prosecutors charged the defendant with, among other things, the crime of supplying contraband, contrary to Or.Rev.Stat. § 162.185(l)(a) (2005). Tippetts, 43 P.”
In Re Garvey (1997)
“155(l)(c)), [2] Supplying Contraband (ORS 162.185(l)(a)), [3] two (2) counts of Perjury (ORS 162.”
State v. Bates (2005)
“ORS 162.185. 1 His sole assignment of error asserts that, by requiring him to wear a “stun belt,” the trial court violated his constitutional right to be free from physical restraints during his trial.”
Hall v. State (2015)
“160 (fourth-degree assault); ORS 162.185 (supplying contraband). A later review of a recording from a security camera revealed that no one, in fact, had touched or tampered with plaintiffs drink bottle.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185(1) — 5 cases
State v. Williams (1999)
“Defendant was charged with supplying contraband, ORS 162.185, after marijuana was discovered in his possession when he was being booked after being arrested for unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.”
State v. Crane (1980)
State v. Williams (1978)
“The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to an information charging him with the crime of supplying contraband, ORS 162.185, and the state appeals. The issue is whether the definition of contraband in ORS 162.”
State v. Franklin (1978)
State v. Stiehl (2007)
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185(1)(a) — 5 cases
State v. Tippetts (2002)
“]” ORS 162.185(1)(a). 1 At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of supplying contraband.”
State v. Gneiting (2020)
State v. Gotchall (2002)
State v. Franklin (1978)
State v. Mitchell (1976)
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185(1)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Gotchall (2002)
State v. Craigen (2019)
State v. Meyer (1978)
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185(l)(a) — 8 cases
State v. Tippetts (2002)
“]” ORS 162.185(1)(a). 1 At trial, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of supplying contraband.”
State v. Cole (2007)
“Prosecutors charged the defendant with, among other things, the crime of supplying contraband, contrary to Or.Rev.Stat. § 162.185(l)(a) (2005). Tippetts, 43 P.”
In Re Garvey (1997)
“155(l)(c)), [2] Supplying Contraband (ORS 162.185(l)(a)), [3] two (2) counts of Perjury (ORS 162.”
State v. Thaxton (2003)
“992, and supplying contraband, ORS 162.185. He challenges only the conviction for supplying contraband.”
Lucas v. Lake County (2012)
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 162.185(l)(b) — 1 case
State v. Meyer (1978)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.