Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.500 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      183.500 Appeals. Any party to the proceedings before the circuit court may appeal from the judgment of that court to the Court of Appeals. Such appeal shall be taken in the manner provided by law for appeals from the circuit court in suits in equity. [1957 c.717 §14; 1969 c.198 §76; 2003 c.576 §394]

 

(Alternative Dispute Resolution)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Hoekstre v. State Ex Rel. Dlcd, 278 P.3d 123 (Or. Ct. App. 2012).
Hoekstre v. State Ex Rel. Dlcd, 278 P.3d 123 (Or. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “) After reviewing the text, context, and enactment history of the measure, the reviewing court concluded that DLCD had properly interpreted section 6(3) and that, based *634 on that interpretation, petitioner was not entitled to the additional, fourth parcel that he sought.”
Oregon Health Care Ass'n v. Health Div., 992 P.2d 434 (Or. 1999). · cites it 3× “490, and ORS 183.500. The second exception is a proceeding in which the party challenging the agency order makes a “showing that the agency is proceeding without probable cause.”
Teel Irrigation Dist. v. Water Resources Dep't, 898 P.2d 1344 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 6× “484; ORS 183.500. We reverse, in part. An overview of the law that governs water rights will provide a better understanding of our discussion of this case.”
City of Eugene v. State, 117 P.3d 1001 (Or. 2005). · cites it 4× “Third, ORS 183.500 provides: "Any party to the proceedings before the circuit court may appeal from the judgment of that court to the Court of Appeals.”
Kaser v. PERS, 506 P.3d 1134 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “450(4) to “determine the accuracy of the disputed information” provided to PERS by petitioner’s employer and we reject petitioner’s remain- ing arguments without written discussion.”
Powell v. Bunn, 59 P.3d 559 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “” 3 ORS 183.500 provides that an appeal of a circuit court judgment following judicial review of a noncontested case order “shall be taken in the manner provided by law for appeals from the circuit court in suits in equity.”
Reynolds v. State Bd. of Naturopathic Examiners, 722 P.2d 739 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “310 to ORS 183.500 which precludes this declaratory judgment action.”
Norden v. State, Water Resources Dept., 996 P.2d 958 (Or. 2000). “2 ORS 183.500. Before the Court of Appeals, the department argued that, because Justus had issued an order in other than a contested case proceeding, the record on judicial review consisted of both the information on which Justus had relied in *645 issuing the order and the…”
Local No. 290 v. Oregon Dep't of Env't Quality, 919 P.2d 1168 (Or. 1996). “See ORS 183.500 (providing for appeals from the circuit court to the Court of Appeals in such circumstances).”
Cohen v. Powers, 43 P.3d 1150 (Or. Ct. App. 2002). “The Crook County District Attorney, and then the circuit court, determined that a July 15, 1992, Crook County Circuit Court order is the controlling support order. The 1992 order provides for Powers to pay child support of $371 per month so long as the child is attending school.”
Teel Irrigation Dist. v. Water Resources Dep't, 919 P.2d 1172 (Or. 1996). “484; ORS 183.500. Teel Irrigation Dist. v. Water Resources Dept.”
Hardy v. State Land Bd., 360 P.3d 647 (Or. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “The court entered a general judgment reflecting those rulings and setting aside the declaration of ownership in its entirety.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.