Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.606

Civil liability for violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607; attorney fees; status of evidence obtained in violation

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      192.606 Civil liability for violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607; attorney fees; status of evidence obtained in violation. (1) Any customer who suffers any ascertainable loss as a result of a willful violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607 by any person, may bring an individual action in an appropriate court to recover actual damages or $1,000, whichever is greater.

      (2) Any customer who suffers any ascertainable loss as a result of a negligent violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607 by any person, may bring an individual action in an appropriate court to recover actual damages.

      (3)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, the court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in an action under this section.

      (b) The court may not award attorney fees to the state or a political subdivision of the state if the state or political subdivision prevails in an action under this section.

      (4) An action to enforce any provision of ORS 192.583 to 192.607 must be commenced within two years after the date on which the violation occurred.

      (5) Evidence obtained in violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607 is inadmissible in any proceeding. [Formerly 192.590]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: State v. Ghim
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ghim (2016) or · cites it 5× “The trial court recognized that, under ORS 192.606(5), “[e]vidence obtained in violation of ORS 192.”
State v. Eskie (2016) orctapp “590 was renumbered as ORS 192.606. See, e.g., Thompson-Seed, 162 Or App at 488-89 (listing examples ranging from admissibility of Breathalyzer test results to inadmissibility of evidence obtained in violation of wiretap statutes).”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.606(5) — 1 case
State v. Ghim (2016) or “The trial court recognized that, under ORS 192.606(5), “[e]vidence obtained in violation of ORS 192.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.