Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.583

Definitions for ORS 192.583 to 192.607

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      192.583 Definitions for ORS 192.583 to 192.607. As used in ORS 192.583 to 192.607:

      (1) “Customer” means any person, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or other legal entity, who or which is transacting or has transacted business with a financial institution, or who or which is using or has used the services of such an institution, or for whom or which a financial institution has acted or is acting as a fiduciary.

      (2) “Financial institution” means:

      (a) A “financial institution” as defined in ORS 706.008; or

      (b) A “trust company” as defined in ORS 706.008.

      (3) “Financial records” means any original written or electronic document, any copy of the document, or any information contained in the document, held by or in the custody of a financial institution, when the document, copy or information is identifiable as pertaining to one or more customers of such an institution.

      (4) “Local agency” means every county, city, school district, municipal organization, district, political subdivision; or any board, commission or agency thereof; or any other local public agency; and every officer, agent or employee thereof.

      (5) “State agency” means every state office, department, division, bureau, board or commission or other state agency, including the Legislative Assembly and every officer, agent or employee thereof.

      (6) “Summons or subpoena” means an administrative summons or administrative subpoena issued by any state or local agency, or a judicial subpoena or subpoena duces tecum. [Formerly 192.550]

 

      192.585 [1977 c.517 §8(2),(3); 2005 c.130 §2; renumbered 192.603 in 2011]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: State v. Ghim
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ghim (2016) or · cites it 2× “606(5), “[e]vidence obtained in violation of ORS 192.583 to 192.607 [the bank records statutes] is inadmissible in any proceeding.”
State v. Bobbitt (2012) orctapp · cites it 2× “[1] The entire group of banking privacy laws was renumbered in 2011, and is now found at ORS 192.583 through 192.607. References throughout this opinion are to the numbering of those statutes as of 2007.”
Randant v. Cain (2025) orctapp · cites it 2× “” ORS 192.583(1). Here, the post-conviction court found that “the sole propri- etor listed on the account” was “another individual.”
State v. Eskie (2016) orctapp “The entire group of banking privacy laws was subsequently renumbered in 2011, and is now found at ORS 192.583 through 192.607. Former ORS 192.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 192.583(1) — 1 case
Randant v. Cain (2025) orctapp “” ORS 192.583(1). Here, the post-conviction court found that “the sole propri- etor listed on the account” was “another individual.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.