Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 197.450 (2026)

Siting without taking goal exception

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

197.450 Siting without taking goal exception. In accordance with the provisions of ORS 30.947, 197.435 to 197.467, 215.213, 215.283 and 215.284, a comprehensive plan may provide for the siting of a destination resort on rural lands without taking an exception to statewide planning goals relating to agricultural lands, forestlands, public facilities and services or urbanization. [1987 c.886 §5]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2017 · leading case: Foland v. Jackson Cnty., 807 P.2d 801 (Or. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Foland v. Jackson Cnty., 807 P.2d 801 (Or. 1991). · cites it 2× “See ORS 197.450 (destination resort siting without taking goal exception).”

Cent. Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes Cnty., 396 P.3d 968 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “450 provides, in part, that “a comprehensive plan may provide for the siting of a destination resort on rural lands without taking an exception to statewide planning goals relating to agricultural lands, forestlands, public facilities and services or urbanization.”

Friends of Marion Cnty. v. Marion Cnty., 227 P.3d 198 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “]’ * * * We understand that language to indicate that [a] development that does not meet those standards does not ‘qualify’ for approval under the destination resort statutes, and therefore cannot take advantage of the ORS 197.450 option to site a destination resort without the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.