293.250
Collections Unit; assistance in collection of amounts due to certain entities;
rules; charges; setoff of sums due debtor; warrants. (1) There is created a Collections
Unit in the Department of Revenue.
(2) The
Department of Revenue may render assistance in the collection of any delinquent
account owing to any of the following entities, if the account is assigned by
the entity to the department for collection:
(a) A state
agency;
(b) A public
university listed in ORS 352.002, notwithstanding ORS 352.138;
(c) The Oregon
Health and Science University, notwithstanding ORS 353.100;
(d) A community
college or community college district;
(e) A county, for
debts arising pursuant to a judgment obtained under ORS 169.151; or
(f) The Oregon
State Bar, notwithstanding ORS 9.010, for the purpose of collecting assignments
to a client security fund established under ORS 9.625.
(3) The
Department of Revenue may render assistance in the collection of any delinquent
account owing to any of the following entities, if the account is assigned to
the department for the limited purpose of collection through setoff against any
refunds or sums due to a debtor from the department or any other state agency:
(a) Any local
government, as defined in ORS 174.116; or
(b) Any special
government body, as defined in ORS 174.117.
(4)(a) The
Department of Revenue may prescribe criteria for the kinds of accounts for
which the department will render assistance under subsections (2) and (3) of this
section, including a minimum dollar amount owed.
(b) Nothing in
this section requires the department to render assistance in the collection of
any delinquent account.
(5)(a) Subject to
rules prescribed by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services for
collection of delinquent accounts owing to entities listed in subsections (2)
and (3) of this section, the Department of Revenue may render assistance in the
collection and shall charge the entities separately for the cost of assistance.
The charges may not exceed the proceeds of collection credited to the entity
for the same biennium. The Department of Revenue may designate a single
percentage to retain from the proceeds of collection as a charge for the cost
of assistance. If the Department of Revenue finds that accounts assigned to the
department for collection by a particular entity lack sufficient information to
properly and efficiently identify the debtor or that the account information
must be put into a form usable by the department in order to efficiently
provide collection services, the department may establish a separate percentage
charge to be retained from collections for that entity. The charge must reflect
the average of the actual cost to provide collection services for all accounts
assigned by the entity.
(b) In providing
assistance, the Department of Revenue shall make all reasonable efforts to
collect the delinquent accounts. The department may offset any refunds or sums
due to the debtor from the department or any other state agency against
delinquent accounts assigned to the department for collection under this
section.
(c) No setoff may
be made by the Department of Revenue unless the debt is in a liquidated amount.
(d) At the time
any setoff is made, the Department of Revenue shall notify the debtor of the
sums due to the debtor from a state agency that are applied against the debtor’s
delinquent account. The notice must provide that the debtor may, within 30 days
and in a manner prescribed by the department, contest the setoff and request a
hearing before the department. No issues may be considered at the hearing that
were previously litigated or that the debtor failed to raise timely after being
given due notice of rights of appeal.
(e) All moneys
received by the Department of Revenue in payment of charges made under
paragraph (a) of this subsection shall be paid into the State Treasury and
deposited in a miscellaneous receipts account for the department.
(f) Net proceeds
of collections of delinquent accounts shall be credited to the account or fund
of the entity to which the debt was originally owing.
(6)(a) In
providing assistance in the collection of any delinquent account under
subsection (2) of this section, the Department of Revenue may issue a warrant
for the collection of the delinquent account. The warrant may be recorded in
the County Clerk Lien Record maintained under ORS 205.130.
(b) A warrant may
not be issued under this subsection unless the debt is in a liquidated amount.
(c) The amount of
any warrant issued under this subsection shall include the amount of the debt,
any added penalties or interest attributable to the delinquent account and any
costs associated with recording, indexing or service of the warrant and any satisfaction
or release thereof.
(d) A warrant may
not be issued under this subsection before the debtor has been notified that
the department intends to issue the warrant and of the collection action that
may be taken under the warrant.
(7) Except as
prohibited by federal law and notwithstanding any provision of state law, for
purposes of collecting debts assigned to the Department of Revenue under ORS
293.231, the Collections Unit created under subsection (1) of this section has
access to all data and other information available to the department for any
purpose allowed by law.
(8) Nothing in
this section prohibits the collection of:
(a) A child or
spousal support obligation as provided in ORS 25.610; or
(b) Criminal
judgments that impose monetary obligations, including judgments requiring the
payment of fines, costs, assessments, compensatory fines, attorney fees,
forfeitures or restitution.
(9)(a) As used in
this section, “state agency” means any state officer, board, commission,
corporation, institution, department or other state organization.
(b)
Notwithstanding ORS 182.460, 284.118, 284.375, 377.836, 421.352, 656.753 and
757.552, “state agency” includes semi-independent state agencies listed in ORS
182.454, the Oregon Tourism Commission, the Oregon Film and Video Office, the
Travel Information Council, the Children’s Trust Fund of Oregon Foundation,
Oregon Corrections Enterprises, the State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation
and the Oregon Utility Notification Center. [1971 c.604 §2; 1977 c.603 §1; 1979
c.442 §1; 1987 c.758 §14; 1989 c.519 §7; 1995 c.512 §1; 2001 c.641 §2; 2015
c.766 §5; 2017 c.746 §16; 2019 c.359 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
14
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case:
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
· cites it 5× “Plaintiffs also contend that ORS 293.250 makes defendant’s authority to assist other agencies in debt collection contingent upon the promulgation of rules.”
Dep't of Revenue v. Croslin, 201 P.3d 900 (Or. 2009).
“o has previously tendered a dishonored check, draft, order or electronic funds transfer for the payment of any amount collected by the department and who subsequently makes and tenders to the department any check, draft, order or electronic funds transfer for the payment of any…”
Letkiewicz v. Univ. of Oregon, 835 P.2d 955 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 9× “Under ORS 293.250, the Department of Revenue is authorized to “render assistance in the collection of any delinquent account” owing to a state agency, and the debt maybe collected by “all means available,” including the setoff of any refunds due to a debtor.”
Hefflinger v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2025).
· cites it 18× “However, in lieu of issuing refund checks or direct deposits to ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS TC 5466 Page 1 of 21 Plaintiffs, Defendant applied ORS 293.250, 1 reducing the refunds to zero in order to offset debts that Defendant alleges Plaintiffs owed to the…”
Lynott v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2025).
· cites it 5× “3) The court now reviews the authority cited by Plaintiffs as support for that argument. 1. Plaintiffs’ arguments under state statute Plaintiffs argue that Defendant’s offset of their 2023 state tax refund violated state statute, specifically ORS 293.”
Parr v. Dep't of Revenue, 18 Or. Tax 1 (Or. T.C. 2004).
· cites it 2× “349(6)(c) provides that the kicker refund is subject to the set-off provisions of ORS 293.250. However, those provisions permit set off only where the debt is a liquidated amount.”
Appellof v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
· cites it 2× “” ORS 293.250(3)(b). Thus, in calculating the amount of excess tax owed to a taxpayer, Defendant deducts “offsets for all amounts owed the state.”
In Matter of Marriage of Edmonds, 633 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“Except for about $84 withheld from his 1979 Oregon tax return (under ORS 293.250), father has paid no child support since his arrest and subsequent conviction.”
Robertson v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
“ORS 293.250(3). The statute addressing offsets of state tax refunds to pay federal debts is ORS 305.”
Gooding v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
“ORS 293.250(3). The statute addressing offsets of state tax refunds to pay federal debts is ORS 305.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(2) — 2 cases
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
“Plaintiffs also contend that ORS 293.250 makes defendant’s authority to assist other agencies in debt collection contingent upon the promulgation of rules.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(2)(a) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3) — 3 cases
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
“Plaintiffs also contend that ORS 293.250 makes defendant’s authority to assist other agencies in debt collection contingent upon the promulgation of rules.”
Robertson v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
“ORS 293.250(3). The statute addressing offsets of state tax refunds to pay federal debts is ORS 305.”
Gooding v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
“ORS 293.250(3). The statute addressing offsets of state tax refunds to pay federal debts is ORS 305.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3)(a) — 2 cases
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
“Plaintiffs also contend that ORS 293.250 makes defendant’s authority to assist other agencies in debt collection contingent upon the promulgation of rules.”
Letkiewicz v. Univ. of Oregon, 835 P.2d 955 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
“Under ORS 293.250, the Department of Revenue is authorized to “render assistance in the collection of any delinquent account” owing to a state agency, and the debt maybe collected by “all means available,” including the setoff of any refunds due to a debtor.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3)(b) — 3 cases
Letkiewicz v. Univ. of Oregon, 835 P.2d 955 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
“Under ORS 293.250, the Department of Revenue is authorized to “render assistance in the collection of any delinquent account” owing to a state agency, and the debt maybe collected by “all means available,” including the setoff of any refunds due to a debtor.”
Parr v. Dep't of Revenue, 18 Or. Tax 1 (Or. T.C. 2004).
“349(6)(c) provides that the kicker refund is subject to the set-off provisions of ORS 293.250. However, those provisions permit set off only where the debt is a liquidated amount.”
Appellof v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2017).
“” ORS 293.250(3)(b). Thus, in calculating the amount of excess tax owed to a taxpayer, Defendant deducts “offsets for all amounts owed the state.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3)(c) — 1 case
Brown v. Lobdell, 585 P.2d 4 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
“Plaintiffs also contend that ORS 293.250 makes defendant’s authority to assist other agencies in debt collection contingent upon the promulgation of rules.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3)(d) — 1 case
Letkiewicz v. Univ. of Oregon, 835 P.2d 955 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
“Under ORS 293.250, the Department of Revenue is authorized to “render assistance in the collection of any delinquent account” owing to a state agency, and the debt maybe collected by “all means available,” including the setoff of any refunds due to a debtor.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(3)(e) — 1 case
Hefflinger v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2025).
“However, in lieu of issuing refund checks or direct deposits to ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS TC 5466 Page 1 of 21 Plaintiffs, Defendant applied ORS 293.250, 1 reducing the refunds to zero in order to offset debts that Defendant alleges Plaintiffs owed to the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(5) — 1 case
Hefflinger v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2025).
“However, in lieu of issuing refund checks or direct deposits to ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS TC 5466 Page 1 of 21 Plaintiffs, Defendant applied ORS 293.250, 1 reducing the refunds to zero in order to offset debts that Defendant alleges Plaintiffs owed to the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 293.250(5)(d) — 1 case
Hefflinger v. Dept. of Rev. (Or. T.C. 2025).
“However, in lieu of issuing refund checks or direct deposits to ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS TC 5466 Page 1 of 21 Plaintiffs, Defendant applied ORS 293.250, 1 reducing the refunds to zero in order to offset debts that Defendant alleges Plaintiffs owed to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.