Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.200 (2026)

Administrative licenses based on professional skills and experience

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      342.200 Administrative licenses based on professional skills and experience. In order to allow the school districts of the state to take full advantage of various professional skills and disciplines not directly developed through teaching experience or professional education for which teaching experience is a prerequisite, it is the public policy of the State of Oregon that the Teacher Standards and Practices Commission, when considering an applicant for an administrative license, shall consider professional skills, education and experience not directly related to, nor contingent upon, teaching experience or training as a classroom teacher. [1971 c.570 §1; 1973 c.270 §10; 2011 c.609 §7; 2015 c.647 §§19,43]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1973–1979 · leading case: Zollinger v. Warner, 593 P.2d 1107 (Or. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Zollinger v. Warner, 593 P.2d 1107 (Or. 1979). · cites it 4× “rtion of the statute provides: "No permanent teacher who has served as an administrator in a particular position for a period of three successive years in a tenure district shall be transferred to a lower paying positional an administrator or to a nonadministrative position…”
Sch. Dist. No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Bd., 512 P.2d 799 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 3× “The last subsection, subsection (8), states: "Nothing in ORS 342.200 and 342.805 to 342.955 precludes a permanent teacher or a district school board from obtaining a writ of review as provided in ORS 34.”
Barnes v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Bd., 548 P.2d 988 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “895(1) provides: "Authority to dismiss a permanent teacher is vested in the district school board subject to the provisions of the fair dismissal procedures of ORS 342.200 and 342.805 to 342.955 and only after recommendation of the *180 dismissal is given to the district school…”
Dabritz v. Bd. of Directors of Baker Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 5J, 508 P.2d 459 (Or. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 2× “508 provides: “(1) In any school district which is not subject to the provisions of ORS 342.200 and 342.805 to 342.955 but which has an average daily membership in excess of 800 pupils, a teacher or administrator who has been regularly employed by the school district for the…”
Zollinger v. Frear, 574 P.2d 680 (Or. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “845(2) provides: "No permanent teacher who has served as an administrator in a particular position for a period of three successive years in a tenure district shall be transferred to a lower paying position as an administrator or to a nonadministrative position without his…”
Schaaf v. Eugene Sch. Dist. No. 4J, 529 P.2d 943 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). “It provides': “No permanent teacher who has served as an administrator in a particular position for a period of three successive years in a tenure district shall be transferred to a lower paying position as an administrator or to a nonadministrative position without his consent…”
McMullen v. Dist. Sch. Bd. of Sch. Dist. 24J, 533 P.2d 812 (Or. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “hich reads as follows: “ ‘No permanent teacher who has served as an administrator in a particular position for a period of three successive years in a tenure dis *58 trict shall be transferred to a lower paying position as an administrator or to a nonadministrative position…”
Thompson v. Sch. Dist. No. UH7J, 548 P.2d 161 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). “508 (repealed, Oregon Laws 1973, ch 298, § 9) which in pertinent part provided as follows: "(1) In any school district which is not subject to the provisions of ORS 342.200 and 342.805 to 342.955 but which has an average daily membership in excess of 800 pupils, a teacher or…”
Porter v. Sch. Dist. No. 24J, 571 P.2d 1286 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “It is silent on the point in issue and makes no reference to any rules or regulations which might include such a duty. It appears to cover little more than is required as a minimum in a teacher’s contract by ORS 342.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.