Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905

Appeal procedure; arbitration as alternative

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      342.905 Appeal procedure; arbitration as alternative. (1) If the district school board dismisses the teacher or does not extend the contract of the contract teacher, the teacher or the teacher’s representative may appeal that decision to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board established under ORS 342.930 by depositing by certified mail addressed to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and a copy to the superintendent of the school district:

      (a) In the case of dismissal, within 10 days, as provided in ORS 174.120, after receipt of notice of the district school board’s decision, notice of appeal with a brief statement giving the reasons for the appeal.

      (b) In the case of a contract nonextension, within 15 days, as provided in ORS 174.120, after receipt of the written notice of nonextension of a contract, notice of appeal with a brief statement giving the reasons for the appeal.

      (2)(a) As soon as practicable after the time the notice of appeal is received by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the superintendent shall appoint a panel of three members from the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board for the purpose of conducting a hearing. Insofar as practicable, the panel shall be selected from those members of the board serving in positions where the average daily membership as determined in ORS 342.930 most nearly coincides with that of the involved district. The panel shall consist of:

      (A) One member from the category representing district school board members;

      (B) One member from the category not affiliated with common or union high school districts; and

      (C) One member from the category representing teachers or administrators, as follows:

      (i) If the appeal is from a contract teacher in a teaching position, the panel shall include the teacher member of the board.

      (ii) If the contract teacher is in an administrative position, an administrative member shall sit in place of the teacher member.

      (b) The panel may not contain a member who is a resident of the district that is bringing the dismissal or nonextension.

      (c) The Department of Education, at the department’s expense, shall provide to the panel appropriate professional and other special assistance reasonably required to conduct a hearing. The panel shall be empowered, on behalf of the contract teacher, the district superintendent and the district school board, to subpoena and swear witnesses and to require witnesses to give testimony and produce relevant evidence at or prior to the hearing.

      (d) The executive secretary of the board may issue subpoenas on behalf of a panel. A person subpoenaed under this subsection may move to quash or modify the subpoena if it is oppressive or unreasonable. The motion must be made before the time specified in the subpoena for appearance or production of materials. The motion may be made to the executive secretary or the panel.

      (e) In a case pending before a panel that involves a teacher’s performance at an Oregon Youth Authority facility, the panel assigned to the case may submit to the Director of the Oregon Youth Authority written questions that the panel unanimously agrees are relevant to the case. The director shall respond to the panel’s questions in writing within 20 days of the director’s receipt of the questions from the panel. If a question by the panel seeks information that is not confidential or privileged under Oregon or federal law, the director shall provide the information requested by the panel. If a question by the panel seeks information that is confidential or privileged under Oregon or federal law, the director, in responding to the question, may not disclose the confidential or privileged information but shall instead explain that the information being sought is confidential or privileged. The procedure outlined in this paragraph is not in lieu of any other mechanism that may be available to the panel or parties for obtaining or presenting evidence.

      (3) The Attorney General shall assign an assistant, at no cost to either involved party, to advise the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, to be present at any hearing held by a panel, and to perform those tasks at the request of the board that would normally require legal training.

      (4) Within 10 days after receipt of the notice of an appeal of contract nonextension, the district shall serve upon the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board and the teacher a written statement of reason for the contract nonextension, which shall include:

      (a) A plain and concise statement of the facts relied on to support the statutory grounds for nonextension of the contract;

      (b) The statutory grounds upon which the district believes such contract nonextension is justified; and

      (c) A list of witnesses and documents upon which the district will rely at hearing.

      (5)(a) At least 10 days prior to the hearing, the teacher shall provide a list of witnesses and exhibits to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel and the school district.

      (b) The Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel shall hold a contested case hearing under ORS chapter 183 within 100 days of the receipt by the teacher of notice of dismissal or of the statement of reasons in the case of contract nonextension. No later than 140 days after the filing of an appeal, consistent with due process, the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel shall prepare and send a written decision to the contract teacher, the district superintendent, the district school board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The hearing shall be private unless the teacher requests a public hearing. At the hearing, the district and the contract teacher shall have the right to be present and be heard, to be represented by counsel, to present evidence and cross-examine adverse witnesses and to offer evidence that in the panel’s judgment is relevant to the dispute. The panel may take all reasonable steps to require the parties to conclude the hearing in an expeditious manner.

      (6) When the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel has completed its hearing, it shall prepare a written decision and send it to the contract teacher, the district superintendent, the district school board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. The Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel shall determine whether the facts relied upon to support the statutory grounds cited for dismissal or nonextension are true and substantiated. If the panel finds these facts true and substantiated, it shall then consider whether such facts, in light of all the circumstances and additional facts developed at the hearing that are relevant to the statutory standards in ORS 342.865 (1), are adequate to justify the statutory grounds cited. In making such determination, the panel shall consider all reasonable written rules, policies and standards of performance adopted by the school district board unless it finds that such rules, policies and standards have been so inconsistently applied as to amount to arbitrariness. The panel shall not reverse the dismissal or nonextension if it finds the facts relied upon are true and substantiated unless it determines, in light of all the evidence and for reasons stated with specificity in its findings and order, that the dismissal or nonextension was unreasonable, arbitrary or clearly an excessive remedy.

      (7)(a) Subject to subsection (6) of this section and paragraph (b) of this subsection, if the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel finds that the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent are untrue or unsubstantiated, or if true and substantiated, are not adequate to justify the statutory grounds cited as reason for the dismissal or nonextension, and so notifies the contract teacher, the district superintendent, the district school board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the teacher shall be reinstated and the teacher shall receive such back pay as ordered by the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel for the period between the effective date of the dismissal or nonextension and the date of the order reinstating the teacher, or the date when the district actually reinstates the teacher, whichever is later. However, nothing in this section requires a school district to pay the teacher until the reinstatement occurs if the district has other legal grounds for not reinstating the teacher.

      (b) So long as the right of the district board under subsection (9) of this section and under ORS 183.480 and 183.500 to judicial review of the action of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board remains unexpired, the district school board may withhold the reinstated teacher from performance of teaching duties, unless otherwise ordered by the court having jurisdiction of the appeal.

      (c) Subject to ORS 342.850 (9), if the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel determines that the procedures described in ORS 342.850 (2)(b)(A) to (D) have not been substantially complied with, the teacher may be reinstated with back pay as provided in paragraph (a) of this subsection.

      (8) Subject to subsection (6) of this section, if the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel finds the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent true and substantiated, and that those facts justify the statutory grounds cited as reason for the dismissal or nonextension and so notifies the contract teacher, the district superintendent, the district school board and the Superintendent of Public Instruction in writing, the dismissal or nonextension becomes final on the date of the notice.

      (9) An appeal from action of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel shall be taken in the manner provided in ORS 183.480.

      (10)(a) If both the district board and the teacher or teacher’s representative agree, arbitration may be used as an alternative to a hearing before a Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel to determine if the teacher’s dismissal or nonextension of a contract is in compliance with the standards of ORS 342.805 to 342.910. If the teacher or teacher’s representative desires to use the arbitration procedure, the request for arbitration shall be included in the request for appeal that is filed with the Superintendent of Public Instruction under this section. Within 10 days of the time the superintendent of the district is notified of the teacher’s intent to appeal the dismissal or nonextension of a contract, the superintendent of the district shall notify the teacher or teacher’s representative and the Superintendent of Public Instruction as to whether the district has agreed to use the arbitration procedure. If the district determines not to use the arbitration procedure, the hearing procedure shall be continued under this section in the same manner as if no request for arbitration had been made. If the arbitration procedure is used, the teacher has no further rights to a hearing before a Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel.

      (b) The procedures for selection of the arbitrator are those in the applicable collective bargaining agreement. If there is no provision or agreement or if the agreement does not contain a procedure for selection, the parties shall request a list of five arbitrators from the Employment Relations Board and shall choose an arbitrator by alternative striking of names until one name is left. The remaining person shall act as the arbitrator. The Employment Relations Board shall compile a roster of qualified arbitrators from which the lists are to be taken.

      (c) In determining whether the district board’s dismissal or nonextension of the teacher should be sustained, the arbitrator shall use the same reasons, rules and levels of evidence as are required for the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board under ORS 342.805 to 342.910. [1965 c.608 §12; 1971 c.570 §8; 1973 c.298 §6; 1973 c.612 §14; 1977 c.223 §1; 1977 c.400 §5; 1977 c.881 §6; 1979 c.668 §4; 1987 c.663 §2; 1993 c.236 §1; 1993 c.237 §1; 1993 c.778 §28; 1997 c.864 §13; 2001 c.449 §1; 2003 c.798 §4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1967–2023 · leading case: Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2006) or · cites it 23× “The issues in this administrative law case are whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) correctly interpreted and applied the terms “unreasonable” and “clearly an excessive remedy” as they are used in ORS 342.905 and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct…”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) or · cites it 22× “Petitioner appealed to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) by means of the procedure established in ORS 342.905. After a hearing the FDAB found the facts relied upon by the school board in its dismissal to be true and that such facts supported the statutory grounds of…”
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2004) orctapp · cites it 19× “The legislature amended ORS 342.905 in 1979, adding the provision that “the [FDAB] panel shall not reverse the dismissal if it finds the facts relied upon are true and substantiated unless it determines, in light of all the evidence and for reasons stated with specificity in its…”
Lincoln County School District v. Mayer (1979) orctapp · cites it 12× “It is clear from the Fair Dismissal Law that the FDAB must conduct a formal hearing (ORS 342.905), but the fact-finding function of that hearing is confined to determining whether the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent to dismiss the…”
Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education District (1979) or · cites it 4× “100, establishes a different appeal procedure than that available to a dismissed teacher under current ORS 342.905. ORS 342.905 provides that a dismissed teacher must seek review by the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board prior to obtaining judicial review under ORS 183.”
Zollinger v. Warner (1979) or · cites it 8× “915 applies to any hearing conducted pursuant to ORS 342.905. ORS 342.915(3) states: "At the hearing the permanent teacher shall have the right to be present and to be heard, to be represented by counsel and to present through witnesses any competent testimony relevant to the…”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1986) or · cites it 6× “[6] Although most of ORS 342.905 refers to hearings by a "panel," subsection (8) provides for an appeal "from action of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board" rather than from a "panel.”
Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (1991) or · cites it 5× “ORS 342.905(1). FDAB’s scope of review is stated in ORS 342.”
Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25 (1981) orctapp · cites it 9× “" Subsection (3) of this section contemplates that a dismissed or nonrenewed probationary teacher will have some kind of appeal from the determination made by the school board following a hearing.”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) orctapp · cites it 6× “905, was amended after our Mayer decision; subsection (5) of that section now provides: “(5) When the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel has completed its hearing, it shall prepare a written report and send it to the permanent teacher, the district superintendent, the district…”
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2003) orctapp · cites it 4× “2 ORS 342.905(6) provides, in part: “The [FDAB] panel shall determine whether the facts relied upon to support the statutory grounds cited for dismissal or nonextension are true and substantiated.”
Gearhart v. Public Utility Commission (2013) orctapp · cites it 3× “See ORS 342.905(5). The court referred, with evident approval, to our disposition that remanded the case to FDAB to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’ and, in the light of that interpretation, to reconsider whether Kari had neglected a duty.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(1) — 13 cases
Zollinger v. Warner (1979) or “915 applies to any hearing conducted pursuant to ORS 342.905. ORS 342.915(3) states: "At the hearing the permanent teacher shall have the right to be present and to be heard, to be represented by counsel and to present through witnesses any competent testimony relevant to the…”
Lincoln County School District v. Mayer (1979) orctapp “It is clear from the Fair Dismissal Law that the FDAB must conduct a formal hearing (ORS 342.905), but the fact-finding function of that hearing is confined to determining whether the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent to dismiss the…”
Williams v. Cody (1976) orctapp
Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (1991) or “ORS 342.905(1). FDAB’s scope of review is stated in ORS 342.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(11) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(2)(a) — 1 case
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2006) or “The issues in this administrative law case are whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) correctly interpreted and applied the terms “unreasonable” and “clearly an excessive remedy” as they are used in ORS 342.905 and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(3) — 4 cases
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1986) or “[6] Although most of ORS 342.905 refers to hearings by a "panel," subsection (8) provides for an appeal "from action of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board" rather than from a "panel.”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) orctapp “905, was amended after our Mayer decision; subsection (5) of that section now provides: “(5) When the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel has completed its hearing, it shall prepare a written report and send it to the permanent teacher, the district superintendent, the district…”
Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25 (1981) orctapp “" Subsection (3) of this section contemplates that a dismissed or nonrenewed probationary teacher will have some kind of appeal from the determination made by the school board following a hearing.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(4) — 2 cases
Zollinger v. Warner (1979) or “915 applies to any hearing conducted pursuant to ORS 342.905. ORS 342.915(3) states: "At the hearing the permanent teacher shall have the right to be present and to be heard, to be represented by counsel and to present through witnesses any competent testimony relevant to the…”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) orctapp “905, was amended after our Mayer decision; subsection (5) of that section now provides: “(5) When the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board panel has completed its hearing, it shall prepare a written report and send it to the permanent teacher, the district superintendent, the district…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(5) — 17 cases
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) or “Petitioner appealed to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) by means of the procedure established in ORS 342.905. After a hearing the FDAB found the facts relied upon by the school board in its dismissal to be true and that such facts supported the statutory grounds of…”
Gearhart v. Public Utility Commission (2013) orctapp “See ORS 342.905(5). The court referred, with evident approval, to our disposition that remanded the case to FDAB to apply the proper interpretation of ‘duty’ and, in the light of that interpretation, to reconsider whether Kari had neglected a duty.”
Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (1991) or “ORS 342.905(1). FDAB’s scope of review is stated in ORS 342.”
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1986) or “[6] Although most of ORS 342.905 refers to hearings by a "panel," subsection (8) provides for an appeal "from action of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board" rather than from a "panel.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(5)(b) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(6) — 9 cases
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2006) or “The issues in this administrative law case are whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) correctly interpreted and applied the terms “unreasonable” and “clearly an excessive remedy” as they are used in ORS 342.905 and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct…”
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2004) orctapp “The legislature amended ORS 342.905 in 1979, adding the provision that “the [FDAB] panel shall not reverse the dismissal if it finds the facts relied upon are true and substantiated unless it determines, in light of all the evidence and for reasons stated with specificity in its…”
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2003) orctapp “2 ORS 342.905(6) provides, in part: “The [FDAB] panel shall determine whether the facts relied upon to support the statutory grounds cited for dismissal or nonextension are true and substantiated.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(6)(a) — 5 cases
Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19 (1982) or “Petitioner appealed to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) by means of the procedure established in ORS 342.905. After a hearing the FDAB found the facts relied upon by the school board in its dismissal to be true and that such facts supported the statutory grounds of…”
Zollinger v. Warner (1979) or “915 applies to any hearing conducted pursuant to ORS 342.905. ORS 342.915(3) states: "At the hearing the permanent teacher shall have the right to be present and to be heard, to be represented by counsel and to present through witnesses any competent testimony relevant to the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(7) — 4 cases
Lincoln County School District v. Mayer (1979) orctapp “It is clear from the Fair Dismissal Law that the FDAB must conduct a formal hearing (ORS 342.905), but the fact-finding function of that hearing is confined to determining whether the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent to dismiss the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(7)(a) — 2 cases
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2006) or “The issues in this administrative law case are whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) correctly interpreted and applied the terms “unreasonable” and “clearly an excessive remedy” as they are used in ORS 342.905 and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(7)(b) — 1 case
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2003) orctapp “2 ORS 342.905(6) provides, in part: “The [FDAB] panel shall determine whether the facts relied upon to support the statutory grounds cited for dismissal or nonextension are true and substantiated.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(8) — 5 cases
Lincoln County School District v. Mayer (1979) orctapp “It is clear from the Fair Dismissal Law that the FDAB must conduct a formal hearing (ORS 342.905), but the fact-finding function of that hearing is confined to determining whether the facts relied on to support the recommendation of the district superintendent to dismiss the…”
Jefferson County School District No. 509-J v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (1991) or “ORS 342.905(1). FDAB’s scope of review is stated in ORS 342.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(9) — 3 cases
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2006) or “The issues in this administrative law case are whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) correctly interpreted and applied the terms “unreasonable” and “clearly an excessive remedy” as they are used in ORS 342.905 and whether the Court of Appeals applied the correct…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 342.905(l)(a) — 1 case
Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District (2004) orctapp “The legislature amended ORS 342.905 in 1979, adding the provision that “the [FDAB] panel shall not reverse the dismissal if it finds the facts relied upon are true and substantiated unless it determines, in light of all the evidence and for reasons stated with specificity in its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.