371.605
Definitions for ORS 371.605 to 371.660. As used in ORS 371.605 to 371.660, unless the context
requires otherwise:
(1) “Owner” means
a vendee under a recorded land contract or if there is no such contract, the
holder of the record title, which vendee or holder has a present interest equal
to or greater than a life estate.
(2) “Engineer”
means the county engineer, roadmaster, surveyor or other engineer selected by
the county governing body.
(3) “Improvement”
includes:
(a) The grading,
graveling, paving or other surfacing of any road, or opening, laying out,
widening, extending, altering, changing the grade of or constructing any road.
(b) The
construction or reconstruction of sidewalks.
(c) The
installation of ornamental street lights.
(d) The
reconstruction or repair of any road improvement mentioned in this subsection.
(e) The
acquisition, establishment, construction or reconstruction of any off-road
motor vehicle parking facility.
(f) Installing,
constructing, reconstructing, improving, extending or repairing lateral sewers,
street mains, sewage disposal systems or similar facilities, and other
facilities incidental thereto, within the right of way of a county road or
public road.
(4) “Road,” “county
road” and “public road” have the meanings given those terms in ORS 368.001. [Amended
by 1955 c.773 §1; 1973 c.461 §1; 1975 c.738 §2; 1983 c.305 §1]
Notes of Decisions
Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of Beaverton, 138 P.3d 23 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
“” ORS 371.605(3)(f), which concerns improvement of streets and roads in unincorporated areas, defines “improvement” to include “extending or repairing lateral sewers, street mains, sewage disposal systems or similar facilities.”
Multnomah Cnty. v. Rockwood Water Dist., 347 P.2d 111 (Or. 1959).
· cites it 2× “The principal question involved is whether the water district, a municipal corporation, is required to pay the cost of lowering its water pipes on the grad *358 ing of a dedicated street, or whether such costs should be assessed to the adjacent property owners under ORS 371.605…”
Rink v. Kortge, 555 P.2d 775 (Or. 1976).
· cites it 2× “In 1965 and 1967 the owners of certain lots in Wasco County petitioned the county court to make street improvements under ORS 371.605 to 371.660. The improvements were made but the owners failed to pay the costs assessed.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 371.605(1) — 1 case
Rink v. Kortge, 555 P.2d 775 (Or. 1976).
“In 1965 and 1967 the owners of certain lots in Wasco County petitioned the county court to make street improvements under ORS 371.605 to 371.660. The improvements were made but the owners failed to pay the costs assessed.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 371.605(3)(f) — 1 case
Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of Beaverton, 138 P.3d 23 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
“” ORS 371.605(3)(f), which concerns improvement of streets and roads in unincorporated areas, defines “improvement” to include “extending or repairing lateral sewers, street mains, sewage disposal systems or similar facilities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.