Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 377.992 (2026)

Penalties; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      377.992 Penalties; rules. (1)(a) A person who violates any provision of ORS 377.510 (1) or 377.700 to 377.844 or any regulation of the Travel Information Council adopted pursuant thereto is subject to a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per day for each day of violation, or the amount of gross revenues earned for the sign during the period of time the violation continues, whichever is greater.

      (b) The Department of Transportation shall adopt rules to develop a decision matrix to be used in determining the amount of the civil penalty imposed under this subsection. The matrix must take into account the nature of the violation committed, the number of violations committed and any other factors the department determines necessary.

      (2) Violation of the conditions and provisions of a permit procured under ORS 377.050 by any person having procured the permit is punishable, upon conviction, by a civil penalty of not more than $100.

      (3) Violation of ORS 377.030 to 377.050, 377.510 (2), 377.620 (2) or 377.635 is punishable, upon conviction, by a civil penalty of not more than $100.

      (4) Civil penalties under this section shall be imposed in the manner provided by ORS 183.745. [1971 c.770 §28; 2001 c.508 §3; 2009 c.463 §11; 2011 c.9 §49]

 

      377.995 [1959 c.309 §21; subsection (5) enacted as 1961 c.615 §17; subsection (6) enacted as 1961 c.614 §11; subsection (7) enacted as 1967 c.590 §12; repealed by 1971 c.770 §31]

 

CHAPTERS 378 TO 380

 [Reserved for expansion]

_______________

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2006 · leading case: Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State, 20 P.3d 180 (Or. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State, 20 P.3d 180 (Or. 2001). · cites it 2× “840; ORS 377.992. Plaintiff contends that the OMIA, which regulates signs along Oregon highways, violates the free speech provisions of both the state and federal constitutions.”
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 132 P.3d 5 (Or. 2006). · cites it 2× “840 and ORS 377.992 (1999) (OMIA). [1] For the reasons that we discuss below, we conclude that (1) many of the OMIA's restrictions on highway signs, including the imposition of certain permit and fee requirements, are reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions that are…”
Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State, 945 P.2d 614 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “840 and ORS 377.992. The OMIA generally prohibits the installation or maintenance of any “outdoor advertising sign” or any “directional sign” visible to motorists traveling on state highways, unless it complies with the OMIA, state administrative rules and federal law, or unless…”
West Coast Media, LLC v. City of Gladstone, 84 P.3d 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2004). “Before LUBA, applicant argued that the city code, as applied here, was unconstitutional in that it prohibited freestanding signs carrying commercial advertising but did not prohibit freestanding signs containing public service information or political advertising.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.