Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205

Judgments described; jurisdiction of juvenile court during pendency of appeal; disposition

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      419A.205 Judgments described; jurisdiction of juvenile court during pendency of appeal; disposition. (1) For the purpose of being appealed, the following are judgments:

      (a) A judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court;

      (b) A judgment disposing of a petition including, but not limited to, a disposition under ORS 419B.325 or 419C.411;

      (c) Any final disposition of a petition; and

      (d) A final order adversely affecting the rights or duties of a party and made in a proceeding after judgment including, but not limited to, a final order under ORS 419B.449 or 419B.476.

      (2) An appeal from a judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court does not deprive the juvenile court of jurisdiction to proceed with a disposition of the matter.

      (3) If an appeal is taken from a judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court before the juvenile court enters a judgment disposing of the matter under ORS 419B.325 or 419C.411, any necessary modification of the appeal must be made according to the rules of the appellate court.

      (4) When an appeal is taken from a judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court, if the appellate court:

      (a) Reverses the judgment, the judgment disposing of the matter is reversed; or

      (b) Modifies the judgment, a party may move for relief as otherwise provided by law. [2001 c.480 §2; 2003 c.348 §1; 2003 c.396 §29]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: State v. M. A. S.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. M. A. S. (2020) orctapp · cites it 14× “The Appellate Commissioner gave the juvenile court leave to enter a judgment memorializing the decisions that it had made in its minute order, based on the commissioner’s conclusion that ORS 419A.205 and ORS 419A.200 require a juvenile court’s determination whether it has…”
Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. H. (2019) orctapp · cites it 13× “200(1) provides that a person or entity whose rights or duties are adversely affected “by a judgment of the juvenile court” may appeal, but the statute does not otherwise indicate what types of judgments are appealable.”
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter (2005) orctapp · cites it 5× “According to the state, the order was appealable under ORS 419A.205, mother failed to appeal it, and her appeal from the judgment terminating her parental rights is an impermissible collateral attack on the earlier order.”
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. W. (2008) or · cites it 9× “As is apparent, the parties differ over the meaning of the term “judgment” as that term is used in the statute governing appeals of juvenile court decisions, ORS 419A.205. The parties’ arguments focus on the text of that statute and the context in which it is used in chapter…”
Department of Human Services v. A. S.-M. (2015) orctapp · cites it 3× “” See ORS 419A.205. The state argues that the GAL appointment adversely affected mother’s rights because it “substantially changed the manner in which mother would be entitled to direct the course of the dependency proceeding.”
Dept. of Human Services v. T. J. N. (2022) orctapp “Juvenile courts issue various orders and judgments following such hearings, and ORS 419A.205(1) defines which of those orders or judgments are “appealable,” expressly including, among others, final orders resulting from ORS 419B.”
State v. C. P. (2022) orctapp · cites it 2× “200 and ORS 419A.205(1)(d).” ORS 419A.200(1) provides that “a party to a juvenile court pro- ceeding * * * whose rights or duties are adversely affected by a judgment of the juvenile court may appeal therefrom.”
Department of Human Services v. A. D. D. B. (2016) orcclane “” ORS 419A.205(1) defines “judgments,” for purposes of ORS 419A.”
Department of Human Services v. B. P. (2016) orctapp · cites it 7× “” ORS 419A.205(1)(a) defines “judgment” for purposes of appeal as including “[a] judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court.”
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. H.-O. (2008) orctapp · cites it 8× “200 and ORS 419A.205, youth relies on case law predating those statutes to contend that her appeal is timely.”
STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. Jenkins (2006) orctapp “ORS 419A.205(1)(c) provides that, for purposes of appeal, a "final disposition of a petition" constitutes a "judgment.”
Dept. of Human Services v. C. C. (2025) orctapp · cites it 2× “Even construing father’s peti- tions for judicial review as notices of appeal, the orders he challenges are not appealable under ORS 419A.205(1), as they are not “final orders.”
Show all 31 citing cases →
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(1) — 12 cases
Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. H. (2019) orctapp “200(1) provides that a person or entity whose rights or duties are adversely affected “by a judgment of the juvenile court” may appeal, but the statute does not otherwise indicate what types of judgments are appealable.”
State v. M. A. S. (2020) orctapp “The Appellate Commissioner gave the juvenile court leave to enter a judgment memorializing the decisions that it had made in its minute order, based on the commissioner’s conclusion that ORS 419A.205 and ORS 419A.200 require a juvenile court’s determination whether it has…”
Dept. of Human Services v. T. J. N. (2022) orctapp “Juvenile courts issue various orders and judgments following such hearings, and ORS 419A.205(1) defines which of those orders or judgments are “appealable,” expressly including, among others, final orders resulting from ORS 419B.”
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter (2005) orctapp “According to the state, the order was appealable under ORS 419A.205, mother failed to appeal it, and her appeal from the judgment terminating her parental rights is an impermissible collateral attack on the earlier order.”
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. W. (2008) or “As is apparent, the parties differ over the meaning of the term “judgment” as that term is used in the statute governing appeals of juvenile court decisions, ORS 419A.205. The parties’ arguments focus on the text of that statute and the context in which it is used in chapter…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(1)(a) — 4 cases
State v. M. A. S. (2020) orctapp “The Appellate Commissioner gave the juvenile court leave to enter a judgment memorializing the decisions that it had made in its minute order, based on the commissioner’s conclusion that ORS 419A.205 and ORS 419A.200 require a juvenile court’s determination whether it has…”
Department of Human Services v. B. P. (2016) orctapp “” ORS 419A.205(1)(a) defines “judgment” for purposes of appeal as including “[a] judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court.”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Jw (2008) or
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. JH-O. (2008) orctapp
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(1)(b) — 1 case
Department of Human Services v. B. P. (2016) orctapp “” ORS 419A.205(1)(a) defines “judgment” for purposes of appeal as including “[a] judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(1)(c) — 8 cases
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter (2005) orctapp “According to the state, the order was appealable under ORS 419A.205, mother failed to appeal it, and her appeal from the judgment terminating her parental rights is an impermissible collateral attack on the earlier order.”
STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. Jenkins (2006) orctapp “ORS 419A.205(1)(c) provides that, for purposes of appeal, a "final disposition of a petition" constitutes a "judgment.”
STATE EX REL. DHS v. Sumpter (2005) orctapp
In re G. V. L. (2018) orctapp
Dept. of Human Services v. C. S. (2024) orctapp
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(1)(d) — 7 cases
State v. C. P. (2022) orctapp “200 and ORS 419A.205(1)(d).” ORS 419A.200(1) provides that “a party to a juvenile court pro- ceeding * * * whose rights or duties are adversely affected by a judgment of the juvenile court may appeal therefrom.”
State v. E. C.-P. (In re E. C.-P.) (2017) orctapp
Dept. of Human Services v. C. S. (2024) orctapp
Dept. of Human Services v. C. S. (2024) orctapp
Department of Human Services v. J. B. (2012) orctapp
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(2) — 2 cases
Department of Human Services v. N. L. (2011) orctapp
Department of Human Services v. B. P. (2016) orctapp “” ORS 419A.205(1)(a) defines “judgment” for purposes of appeal as including “[a] judgment finding a child or youth to be within the jurisdiction of the court.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(4)(a) — 2 cases
Department of Human Services v. M. M. (2016) orctapp
Department of Human Services v. N. L. (2011) orctapp
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(l)(a) — 2 cases
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. W. (2008) or “As is apparent, the parties differ over the meaning of the term “judgment” as that term is used in the statute governing appeals of juvenile court decisions, ORS 419A.205. The parties’ arguments focus on the text of that statute and the context in which it is used in chapter…”
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. H.-O. (2008) orctapp “200 and ORS 419A.205, youth relies on case law predating those statutes to contend that her appeal is timely.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(l)(c) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. J. W. (2008) or “As is apparent, the parties differ over the meaning of the term “judgment” as that term is used in the statute governing appeals of juvenile court decisions, ORS 419A.205. The parties’ arguments focus on the text of that statute and the context in which it is used in chapter…”
State v. S. M. P. (2009) orctapp
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Jenkins (2006) orctapp
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419A.205(l)(d) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter (2005) orctapp “According to the state, the order was appealable under ORS 419A.205, mother failed to appeal it, and her appeal from the judgment terminating her parental rights is an impermissible collateral attack on the earlier order.”
State v. J. G. G. (2016) orccmarion
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Jackson (2006) orctapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.