419C.094
Jurisdiction attaches at time youth taken into custody. Except as otherwise provided in
ORS 419C.103 (3) and (4), the jurisdiction of the juvenile court of the county
in which a youth is taken into custody under ORS 419C.080 and 419C.088 shall
attach from the time the youth is taken into custody. [1993 c.33 §162; 1993
c.546 §62; 1997 c.727 §4; 1999 c.577 §9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: State v. L. P. L. O., 381 P.3d 846 (Or. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. L. P. L. O., 381 P.3d 846 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2ד157; ORS 419C.094. If a child is not taken into protective custody, jurisdiction attaches when other steps are taken to initiate judicial proceedings.”
State v. Goin, 556 P.3d 663 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3ד157; ORS 419C.094. If a child is not taken into pro- tective custody, jurisdiction attaches when other steps are taken to initiate judicial proceedings.”
Brown v. Zenon, 891 P.2d 666 (Or. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4דORS 419C.094, 1 the only statute addressing when juvenile court jurisdiction attaches in delinquency proceedings, provides: “[T]he jurisdiction of the juvenile court of the county in which a child is taken into protective custody shall attach from the time the child is taken…”
State v. J. C. N.-V., 380 P.3d 248 (Or. 2016). “005(1); ORS 419C.094. The state, however, petitioned the juvenile court to waive youth into Washington County Circuit Court so that he could be tried as an adult for, among other things, aggravated murder, ORS 163.”
State v. Godines, 236 P.3d 824 (Or. Ct. App. 2010). “9 Currently, ORS 419C.094 provides, similar to the text oí former ORS 419.”
State v. Gaige, 468 P.3d 532 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “See ORS 419C.094 (providing that juve- nile court jurisdiction attaches when a youth is taken into custody).”
State v. Smith, 482 P.3d 174 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2דThe defendant moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that, even though the charges had been first brought in adult court and there was no existing juvenile case, the juvenile court had juris- diction under ORS 419C.094, because he had been taken into custody before the charges…”
State v. Cid, 545 P.3d 1278 (Or. Ct. App. 2024). “”); ORS 419C.094 (“Except as otherwise provided in ORS 419C.”
State v. Edwards, 585 P.3d 1123 (Or. Ct. App. 2026). “005, together with ORS 419C.094, which provides that “the jurisdiction of the juvenile court of the county in which a youth is taken into custody * * * shall attach from the time the youth is taken into custody” mean that “as a general rule, if a person is over 18 when [they…”
State v. Davis, 106 P.3d 160 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “005 provides that “the juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction in any case involving a person who is under 18 years of age and who has committed an act that is a violation, or that if done by an adult would constitute a violation, of a law or ordinance of the United…”
State v. J. C. N.-V., No. S063111 (Or. May 26, 2016). “005(1); ORS 419C.094. The state, however, petitioned the juvenile court to waive youth into Washington County Circuit Court so that he could be tried as an adult for, among things, aggravated murder, ORS 163.”
State v. J. C. N.-V., No. S063111 (Or. May 26, 2016). “005(1); ORS 419C.094. The state, however, petitioned the juvenile court to waive youth into Washington County Circuit Court so that he could be tried as an adult for, among things, aggravated murder, ORS 163.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.