419C.495 When
commitment to youth correction facility authorized. (1) An adjudicated youth placed in
the legal custody of the Oregon Youth Authority may be placed in a youth
correction facility or in a private institution operated as a facility for
adjudicated youths requiring secure custody only when the juvenile court having
jurisdiction so recommends.
(2) An
adjudicated youth who is admitted to a youth correction facility may be
retained in the facility for the duration of the commitment period. In no case
may an adjudicated youth be retained in a youth correction facility after the
adjudicated youth has attained 25 years of age.
(3) No
adjudicated youth shall be transferred or returned after discharge to a
facility described in subsection (1) of this section, except upon court order
under this chapter.
(4) Nothing in
subsection (3) of this section shall be deemed to prohibit return of an
adjudicated youth to a facility described in subsection (1) of this section, in
the discretion of the youth authority, if the adjudicated youth has been
released from the facility on temporary or indefinite parole, or to prohibit
transfer of an adjudicated youth from one such facility to another. [1993 c.33 §244;
1999 c.109 §2; 2021 c.489 §87]
Notes of Decisions
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Garcia, 44 P.3d 591 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 13× “On February 15, 2000, youth was placed in a youth correctional facility pursuant to ORS 419C.495(1). He appeals from the placement order, and we reverse.”
State v. M. B., 341 Or. App. 334 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “478(1) to the juvenile court’s recommen- dation under ORS 419C.495(1).”1 The state’s point is well taken.”
State v. E. J. R., 341 Or. App. 488 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See ORS 419C.495(1) (“An adjudicated youth placed in the legal cus- tody of the Oregon Youth Authority may be placed in a youth correction facility * * * only when the juvenile court having jurisdiction so recommends[.”
State v. N. K. H., 341 Or. App. 78 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“478(1) and by authorizing [youth’s] incarceration under ORS 419C.495.” As explained below, we conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that committing youth to OYA custody for placement in a youth correctional facility was in his best…”
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Rial, 46 P.3d 217 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
“478; ORS 419C.495. This appeal followed. In his first assignment of error, youth contends that the juvenile court erred in several respects in revoking his probation on the ground that he failed to complete sex offender treatment.”
State v. C. L. B., 345 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 6× “Second, he argues that the juvenile court could not authorize OYA to place him in a youth correction facility under ORS 419C.495 because youth did not meet OYA’s criteria for such placement under OAR 416-410-0060(5).”
State ex rel. Juv. Dep't v. Ortiz, 65 P.3d 1118 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 3× “478; ORS 419C.495; ORS 419C.501. Several months later, youth moved to amend the order on the ground that he was entitled to credit against the period of placement in a youth correction facility for time previously spent in other out-of-home placements.”
State v. M. B., 341 Or. App. 334 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “478(1) to the juvenile court’s recommen- dation under ORS 419C.495(1).”1 The state’s point is well taken.”
State v. C. L. B., 345 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 6× “Second, he argues that the juvenile court could not authorize OYA to place him in a youth correction facility under ORS 419C.495 because youth did not meet OYA’s criteria for such placement under OAR 416-410-0060(5).”
State v. N. K. H., 341 Or. App. 78 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“478(1) and by authorizing [youth’s] incarceration under ORS 419C.495.” As explained below, we conclude that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it determined that committing youth to OYA custody for placement in a youth correctional facility was in his best…”
State v. E. J. R., 341 Or. App. 488 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See ORS 419C.495(1) (“An adjudicated youth placed in the legal cus- tody of the Oregon Youth Authority may be placed in a youth correction facility * * * only when the juvenile court having jurisdiction so recommends[.”
State v. Z. L. G., 345 Or. App. 751 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“When a juvenile court orders a youth into OYA custody while recommending—and thereby autho- rizing—a youth correction facility placement under ORS 419C.495(1), it must necessarily find that the commitment to OYA for that particular type of placement “is most likely to lead to a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 419C.495(1) — 9 cases
State Ex Rel. Juv. Dep't v. Garcia, 44 P.3d 591 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).
“On February 15, 2000, youth was placed in a youth correctional facility pursuant to ORS 419C.495(1). He appeals from the placement order, and we reverse.”
State v. M. B., 341 Or. App. 334 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“478(1) to the juvenile court’s recommen- dation under ORS 419C.495(1).”1 The state’s point is well taken.”
State v. E. J. R., 341 Or. App. 488 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“See ORS 419C.495(1) (“An adjudicated youth placed in the legal cus- tody of the Oregon Youth Authority may be placed in a youth correction facility * * * only when the juvenile court having jurisdiction so recommends[.”
State v. C. L. B., 345 Or. App. 335 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“Second, he argues that the juvenile court could not authorize OYA to place him in a youth correction facility under ORS 419C.495 because youth did not meet OYA’s criteria for such placement under OAR 416-410-0060(5).”
State v. M. B., 341 Or. App. 334 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“478(1) to the juvenile court’s recommen- dation under ORS 419C.495(1).”1 The state’s point is well taken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.