420.045
Parole; discharge; revocation of parole. (1) Upon finding that an adjudicated youth placed in
a youth correction facility is ready for release therefrom and that the
adjudicated youth had best be returned to the parent or guardian of the
adjudicated youth or to a suitable and desirable home or facility, the Director
of the Oregon Youth Authority may, after advising the committing court, release
the adjudicated youth on parole conditioned upon good behavior.
(2) At such time
as the Director of the Oregon Youth Authority finds that final release is
compatible with the safety of the community and the best interests of the
adjudicated youth, with the consent of the committing court, the Director of
the Oregon Youth Authority may make and issue a final order discharging the
adjudicated youth.
(3) The Director
of the Oregon Youth Authority may revoke a parole if the conditions of the
parole have been violated or if the continuation of the adjudicated youth on
parole would not be in the best interests of the adjudicated youth or the
community. After the revocation of parole, the Director of the Oregon Youth
Authority shall immediately advise the committing court thereof. [1965 c.616 §37;
1969 c.679 §9; 1971 c.401 §101; 1995 c.422 §96; 2021 c.489 §114]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases, 1975–1995 · leading case:
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
· cites it 2× “In February, 1981, he was released on parole to his grandparents pursuant to ORS 420.045(1). 5 Custody over the defendant after release appears *36 to have been in the defendant’s grandparents pursuant to a release agreement and ORS 420.”
Application of Shrewsbury, 627 P.2d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “ORS 420.045(1). With the consent of the juvenile court, CSD may issue a final order discharging the child, ORS 420.”
State v. Carsey, 650 P.2d 987 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 2× “Defendant, age 19, was in the legal custody of Children’s Services Division (CSD), having been recently released from McLaren School for Boys pursuant to ORS 420.045(1). 1 Under the terms of a Community Release Agreement, 2 however, CSD transferred custody of defendant to his…”
Haynes v. State of Oregon, 854 P.2d 949 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
“See ORS 420.045(1). On July 27,1988, a juvenile parole officer and a Eugene police officer went to petitioner’s house to look for the stepson because the parole officer had reason to believe that the boy had violated the terms of his release from MacLaren and that he might be at…”
Brown v. Zenon, 891 P.2d 666 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).
“Alternatively, a child’s parole may be revoked and the child returned to MacLaren school under ORS 420.045(3) whenever continued parole would not be “in the best interests of the student or community.”
Morgan v. Maclaren Sch., Child.'s Serv. Div., 543 P.2d 304 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).
“In coming to the conclusions expressed in this opinion, we have been aware of ORS 420.045(3) which provides that “The Administrator of the Children’s Services Division * * * may revoke a parole * * It has not been contended on this appeal that this statute in any way governs the…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 420.045(1) — 4 cases
State v. Carsey, 664 P.2d 1085 (Or. 1983).
“In February, 1981, he was released on parole to his grandparents pursuant to ORS 420.045(1). 5 Custody over the defendant after release appears *36 to have been in the defendant’s grandparents pursuant to a release agreement and ORS 420.”
State v. Carsey, 650 P.2d 987 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).
“Defendant, age 19, was in the legal custody of Children’s Services Division (CSD), having been recently released from McLaren School for Boys pursuant to ORS 420.045(1). 1 Under the terms of a Community Release Agreement, 2 however, CSD transferred custody of defendant to his…”
Haynes v. State of Oregon, 854 P.2d 949 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
“See ORS 420.045(1). On July 27,1988, a juvenile parole officer and a Eugene police officer went to petitioner’s house to look for the stepson because the parole officer had reason to believe that the boy had violated the terms of his release from MacLaren and that he might be at…”
Application of Shrewsbury, 627 P.2d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“ORS 420.045(1). With the consent of the juvenile court, CSD may issue a final order discharging the child, ORS 420.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 420.045(2) — 1 case
Application of Shrewsbury, 627 P.2d 910 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).
“ORS 420.045(1). With the consent of the juvenile court, CSD may issue a final order discharging the child, ORS 420.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 420.045(3) — 2 cases
Brown v. Zenon, 891 P.2d 666 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).
“Alternatively, a child’s parole may be revoked and the child returned to MacLaren school under ORS 420.045(3) whenever continued parole would not be “in the best interests of the student or community.”
Morgan v. Maclaren Sch., Child.'s Serv. Div., 543 P.2d 304 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).
“In coming to the conclusions expressed in this opinion, we have been aware of ORS 420.045(3) which provides that “The Administrator of the Children’s Services Division * * * may revoke a parole * * It has not been contended on this appeal that this statute in any way governs the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.