Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 423.505 (2026)

Legislative policy on program funding

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      423.505 Legislative policy on program funding. Because counties are in the best position for the management, oversight and administration of local criminal justice matters and for determining local resource priorities, it is declared to be the legislative policy of this state to establish an ongoing partnership between the state and counties and to finance with appropriations from the General Fund statewide community correction programs on a continuing basis. The intended purposes of this program are to:

      (1) Provide appropriate sentencing and sanctioning options including incarceration, community supervision and services;

      (2) Provide improved local services for persons charged with criminal offenses with the goal of reducing the occurrence of repeat criminal offenses;

      (3) Promote local control and management of community corrections programs;

      (4) Promote the use of the most effective criminal sanctions necessary to protect public safety, administer punishment to the offender and rehabilitate the offender;

      (5) Enhance, increase and support the state and county partnership in the management of offenders; and

      (6) Enhance, increase and encourage a greater role for local government and the local criminal justice system in the planning and implementation of local public safety policies. [1977 c.412 §1; 1989 c.607 §1; 1995 c.423 §2]

 

      423.510 [1977 c.412 §2; 1985 c.44 §3; 1985 c.558 §7; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]

 

      423.515 [1977 c.412 §4; 1987 c.320 §220a; repealed by 1995 c.423 §31]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–1998 · leading case: Do Mun Kim v. Multnomah Cnty., 909 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
Do Mun Kim v. Multnomah Cnty., 909 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs’ reliance on ORS 423.505 also fails. ORS 423.505 (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 423, § 2) provided: *427 “It is declared to be the legislative policy of this state to establish and finance with appropriations from the General Fund statewide community correction…”
Do Mun Kim v. Multnomah Cnty., 970 P.2d 631 (Or. 1998). “630, ORS 423.505(2), (3) and (4), OAR 291-31-005 et seq.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 423.505(2) — 2 cases
Do Mun Kim v. Multnomah Cnty., 970 P.2d 631 (Or. 1998). “630, ORS 423.505(2), (3) and (4), OAR 291-31-005 et seq.”
Do Mun Kim v. Multnomah Cnty., 909 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996). “Plaintiffs’ reliance on ORS 423.505 also fails. ORS 423.505 (since amended by Or Laws 1995, ch 423, § 2) provided: *427 “It is declared to be the legislative policy of this state to establish and finance with appropriations from the General Fund statewide community correction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.