Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 466.055 (2026)

Criteria for new facility

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      466.055 Criteria for new facility. Before issuing a permit for a new facility designed to dispose of or treat hazardous waste or PCB, the Environmental Quality Commission must find, on the basis of information submitted by the applicant, the Department of Environmental Quality or any other interested party, that the proposed facility meets the following criteria:

      (1) The proposed facility location:

      (a) Is suitable for the type and amount of hazardous waste or PCB intended for treatment or disposal at the facility;

      (b) Provides the maximum protection possible to the public health and safety and environment of Oregon from release of the hazardous waste or PCB stored, treated or disposed of at the facility; and

      (c) Is situated sufficient distance from urban growth boundaries, as defined in ORS 197.015, to protect the public health and safety, accessible by transportation routes that minimize the threat to the public health and safety and to the environment and sufficient distance from parks, wilderness and recreation areas to prevent adverse impacts on the public use and enjoyment of those areas.

      (2) Subject to any applicable standards adopted under ORS 466.035, the design of the proposed facility:

      (a) Allows for treatment or disposal of the range of hazardous waste or PCB as required by the commission; and

      (b) Significantly adds to:

      (A) The range of hazardous waste or PCB handled at a treatment or disposal facility currently permitted under ORS 466.005 to 466.385; or

      (B) The type of technology employed at a treatment or disposal facility currently permitted under ORS 466.005 to 466.385.

      (3) The proposed facility uses the best available technology for treating or disposing of hazardous waste or PCB as determined by the department or the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

      (4) The need for the facility is demonstrated by:

      (a) Lack of adequate current treatment or disposal capacity in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Alaska to handle hazardous waste or PCB generated by Oregon companies;

      (b) A finding that operation of the proposed facility would result in a higher level of protection of the public health and safety or environment; or

      (c) Significantly lower treatment or disposal costs to Oregon companies.

      (5) The proposed hazardous waste or PCB treatment or disposal facility has no major adverse effect on either:

      (a) Public health and safety; or

      (b) Environment of adjacent lands. [1985 c.670 §5; 1987 c.540 §18; 1989 c.833 §96; 2023 c.13 §101]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2005–2005 · leading case: G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 108 P.3d 95 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).
G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 108 P.3d 95 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “For the permit at issue in this case, that means that EQC must find that the incinerators will meet the criteria established in ORS 466.055 for facilities that treat or dispose of hazardous waste.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 466.055(3) — 1 case
G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 108 P.3d 95 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “For the permit at issue in this case, that means that EQC must find that the incinerators will meet the criteria established in ORS 466.055 for facilities that treat or dispose of hazardous waste.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 466.055(5) — 1 case
G.A.S.P. v. Env't Quality Comm'n, 108 P.3d 95 (Or. Ct. App. 2005). “For the permit at issue in this case, that means that EQC must find that the incinerators will meet the criteria established in ORS 466.055 for facilities that treat or dispose of hazardous waste.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.