Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.925 (2026)

Sentences for certain controlled substance offenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      475.925 Sentences for certain controlled substance offenses. When a person is convicted of the unlawful delivery or manufacture of a controlled substance, the court shall sentence the person to a term of incarceration ranging from:

      (1) 58 months to 130 months, depending on the person’s criminal history, if the delivery or manufacture involves:

      (a) 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine;

      (b) 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers or salts of its isomers;

      (c) 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of heroin;

      (d) 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of fentanyl, or any substituted derivative of fentanyl as defined by the rules of the State Board of Pharmacy; or

      (e) 100 grams or more or 500 or more pills, tablets or capsules of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of ecstasy.

      (2) 34 months to 72 months, depending on the person’s criminal history, if the delivery or manufacture involves:

      (a) 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine;

      (b) 100 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers or salts of its isomers;

      (c) 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of heroin;

      (d) 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of fentanyl, or any substituted derivative of fentanyl as defined by the rules of the State Board of Pharmacy; or

      (e) 50 grams or more or 250 or more pills, tablets or capsules of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of ecstasy. [2008 c.14 §2; 2021 c.591 §41; 2023 c.9 §42]

 

      Note: See note under 475.907.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 8× “" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
State v. Gardner-Rolph, 345 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “As to those charges, the trial court “imposed an 81-month prison term, based on application of ORS 475.925 and ORS 475.930.” 291 Or App at 604 .”
State v. Hernandez, 512 P.3d 475 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “Cite as 320 Or App 270 (2022) 271 PER CURIAM After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of unlaw- ful delivery of heroin, ORS 475.850 (Count 1); unlawful pos- session of heroin, ORS 475.”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “He con- tends that although the jury found that his crimes involved substantial quantities for attempted delivery1 of controlled substances, the jury did not find that he committed the com- pleted crime of delivery of a controlled substance, let alone that he committed a…”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “He con- tends that although the jury found that his crimes involved substantial quantities for attempted delivery1 of controlled substances, the jury did not find that he committed the com- pleted crime of delivery of a controlled substance, let alone that he committed a…”
State v. Gardner-Rolph, 345 Or. App. 681 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “As to those charges, the trial court “imposed an 81-month prison term, based on application of ORS 475.925 and ORS 475.930.” 291 Or App at 604 .”
State v. Lander, 344 Or. App. 600 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Like defendant’s sen- tence for delivery of heroin, the sentences for convictions for the unlawful delivery of significant quantities of other controlled substances are guided by ORS 475.925 and ORS 475.930. As a result, related crimes are subject to similar penalties, depending…”
State v. Lander, 344 Or. App. 600 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “Like defendant’s sen- tence for delivery of heroin, the sentences for convictions for the unlawful delivery of significant quantities of other controlled substances are guided by ORS 475.925 and ORS 475.930. As a result, related crimes are subject to similar penalties, depending…”
State v. Nord, 320 Or. App. 672 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “ORS 475.925(1)(b), (c).2 At trial, the state’s theory in support of the charge of unlawful delivery was that defen- dant made an “attempted transfer” of methamphetamine by taking a substantial step toward a completed delivery by possessing nonuser amounts of the drug measured…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.925(1) — 1 case
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.925(1)(b) — 3 cases
State v. Miller, 422 P.3d 327 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “" Consequently, the court proceeded to sentence defendant according to the statutorily required minimum sentences, as applicable.”
State v. Hernandez, 512 P.3d 475 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “Cite as 320 Or App 270 (2022) 271 PER CURIAM After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of unlaw- ful delivery of heroin, ORS 475.850 (Count 1); unlawful pos- session of heroin, ORS 475.”
State v. Nord, 320 Or. App. 672 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). “ORS 475.925(1)(b), (c).2 At trial, the state’s theory in support of the charge of unlawful delivery was that defen- dant made an “attempted transfer” of methamphetamine by taking a substantial step toward a completed delivery by possessing nonuser amounts of the drug measured…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.925(2)(c) — 2 cases
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “He con- tends that although the jury found that his crimes involved substantial quantities for attempted delivery1 of controlled substances, the jury did not find that he committed the com- pleted crime of delivery of a controlled substance, let alone that he committed a…”
State v. Bedford, 344 Or. App. 92 (Or. Ct. App. 2025). “He con- tends that although the jury found that his crimes involved substantial quantities for attempted delivery1 of controlled substances, the jury did not find that he committed the com- pleted crime of delivery of a controlled substance, let alone that he committed a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.