Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 607.045

Livestock at large in livestock districts

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      607.045 Livestock at large in livestock districts. (1) No person owning or having the custody, possession or control of an animal of a class of livestock shall permit the animal to run at large or to be herded, pastured or to go upon the land of another in a livestock district in which it is unlawful for such class of livestock to be permitted to run at large.

      (2) This section is not intended to prohibit a person from driving livestock along a public road.

      (3) Justice and circuit courts have concurrent jurisdiction of actions for the prosecution of violations of this section. [Amended by 1957 c.604 §16]

 

      607.050 [Repealed by 1957 c.604 §41]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1963–1990 · leading case: Dunlap v. Dickson
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dunlap v. Dickson (1988) or · cites it 11× “ORS 607.045(1), when read with ORS 607.992, 2 creates criminal liability.”
Schwerdt v. Myers (1984) or · cites it 14× “On their appeal here, defendants assert: “Since in Oregon there is no prohibition against permitting livestock to run at large except in a livestock district, civil liability for permitting livestock to run at large is established by showing a violation of ORS 607.045, a…”
Parker v. Reter (1963) or · cites it 10× “The scope of the landowner’s duty under ORS 607.045 must be determined by a construction of the statute.”
Watzig v. Tobin (1982) or · cites it 2× “The applicable statute was ORS 607.045(1), which provided: “(1) No person owning or having the custody, possession or control of an animal of a class of livestock shall permit the animal to run at large or to be herded, pastured or to go upon the land of another in a livestock…”
State v. Kelso (1984) orctapp · cites it 8× “Defendant was charged with violating ORS 607.045(1) by permitting his horse to run at large upon the land of another within a livestock district.”
Bilderback v. United States (1982) ord · cites it 3× “ORS 607.045. The Oregon courts have read into the law a protection for motorists.”
Schwerdt v. Myers (1983) orctapp · cites it 14× “ting the cows to escape onto plaintiffs property, defendants argue that plaintiff did not produce evidence that defendants were guilty of criminal negligence and “[s]ince in Oregon there is no prohibition against permitting livestock to run at large except in a livestock…”
Kathren v. Olenik (1980) orctapp “The statute, ORS 607.045(1), provided that no owner of livestock "shall permit the animal to run at large.”
Klinger v. Morrow County Grain Growers, Inc. (1990) orctapp “* * * [T]he legislature must be assumed to know and to anticipate that a statute may affect private rights under the common law when it enacts the statute.”
Dunlap v. Dickson (1988) orctapp · cites it 10× “044 and ORS 607.045 proscribe different types of conduct.”
State v. Holdner (1989) orctapp · cites it 3× “ORS 607.045. Defendant and his son, Randal Holdner (Randal), own property in Columbia County as tenants in common.”
Sprague v. Magruder Farms, Inc. (1979) orctapp · cites it 5× “Plaintiff sued in negligence under ORS 607.045 (livestock at large in livestock district) for damages to his oat crop caused by the defendant’s cattle.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 607.045(1) — 10 cases
Dunlap v. Dickson (1988) or “ORS 607.045(1), when read with ORS 607.992, 2 creates criminal liability.”
Schwerdt v. Myers (1984) or “On their appeal here, defendants assert: “Since in Oregon there is no prohibition against permitting livestock to run at large except in a livestock district, civil liability for permitting livestock to run at large is established by showing a violation of ORS 607.045, a…”
Watzig v. Tobin (1982) or “The applicable statute was ORS 607.045(1), which provided: “(1) No person owning or having the custody, possession or control of an animal of a class of livestock shall permit the animal to run at large or to be herded, pastured or to go upon the land of another in a livestock…”
State v. Kelso (1984) orctapp “Defendant was charged with violating ORS 607.045(1) by permitting his horse to run at large upon the land of another within a livestock district.”
Schwerdt v. Myers (1983) orctapp “ting the cows to escape onto plaintiffs property, defendants argue that plaintiff did not produce evidence that defendants were guilty of criminal negligence and “[s]ince in Oregon there is no prohibition against permitting livestock to run at large except in a livestock…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.