Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.132 (2026)

Consultant license; fee; qualifications; examination; applicability of law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      634.132 Consultant license; fee; qualifications; examination; applicability of law. (1) The annual license fee for a pesticide consultant shall be established by the State Department of Agriculture not to exceed $40.

      (2) An applicant for a pesticide consultant’s license shall be required to demonstrate satisfactorily by written examination or any reexamination given by the department, an adequate knowledge of:

      (a) The characteristics of pesticides and the effect of their application to particular crops.

      (b) The practices of application of pesticides.

      (c) The conditions and times of application of pesticides and the precautions to be taken in connection therewith.

      (d) The applicable laws and rules relating to pesticides and their application in this state.

      (e) Other requirements or procedures which will be of benefit to and protect the pesticide applicators, the persons who use the services of the pesticide applicator and the property of others.

      (3) Based upon the license application and the request of the applicant, the department may examine the applicant only in any one or more of the classes of pesticides established by the department under ORS 634.306 (2).

      (4) Examinations or reexaminations for pesticide consultant’s licenses shall be subject to ORS 634.122 (5) and (6).

      (5) This section shall not apply to licensed pesticide applicators or operators. [1973 c.341 §18; 1975 c.304 §13; 1993 c.599 §3; 2019 c.84 §2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Malaer v. Flying Lion, Inc., 670 P.2d 214 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Malaer v. Flying Lion, Inc., 670 P.2d 214 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “3 Plaintiffs argue that, because the insurance adjuster is a licensed “pesticide consultant,” ORS 634.132, he is charged with knowledge of the notice provision of ORS 634.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 634.132(2) — 1 case
Malaer v. Flying Lion, Inc., 670 P.2d 214 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). “3 Plaintiffs argue that, because the insurance adjuster is a licensed “pesticide consultant,” ORS 634.132, he is charged with knowledge of the notice provision of ORS 634.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.