Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 657.282

Judicial review of decisions under ORS 657.275

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      657.282 Judicial review of decisions under ORS 657.275. Judicial review of decisions under ORS 657.275 shall be as provided for review of orders in contested cases in ORS chapter 183, except that the petition shall be filed within 30 days after the order is served. The Director of the Employment Department may file petition for judicial review in accordance with this section from decisions of the Employment Appeals Board. [1971 c.734 §94; 1983 c.522 §4]

 

657.285 [Amended by 1959 c.583 §19; repealed by 1971 c.734 §21]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 77 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division (1992) or · cites it 2× “” ORS 657.282; ORS 183.482(8)(a). Accordingly, we reverse.”
Giese v. Employment Division (1976) orctapp · cites it 2× “Petitioners Portland State University and the Employment Division seek judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board holding that the university's discharge of claimant was not for misconduct connected with his work.”
Brown v. Adult and Family Services (1982) or · cites it 2× “See ORS 657.282. In the event of overpayment through claimant misrepresentation or through agency error, the assistant director is authorized to bring a civil suit to recover benefits to which the claimant was not entitled.”
Trebesch v. Employment Division (1985) or “ORS 657.282,183.482. The assistant director has comprehensive rulemaking powers.”
Roseburg Forest Products Co. v. Employment Division (1992) or · cites it 6× “ORS 657.282 provides for judicial review of decisions by the EAB "as provided for review of orders in contested cases in ORS 183.”
Skookum Co., Inc. v. Employment Division (1976) orctapp · cites it 2× “ORS 657.282. The Board affirmed the decision of the referee, ORS 657.”
Goin v. Employment Department (2006) orctapp “ORS 657.282. We review EAB’s findings of fact for substantial evidence and its legal conclusions for errors of law and substantial reason.”
Opp v. Employment Department & Youssef, Inc. (2011) orctapp “) ORS 657.282 provides that judicial review of EAB decisions “shall be as provided for review of orders in contested cases in ORS chapter 183.”
Pacificab Co. v. Employment Department (2003) orctapp · cites it 2× “ORS 657.282; ORS 183.482(8)(c); Canvasser Services, Inc.”
Cook v. Employment Division (1980) orctapp “It does maintain, however, that petitioner was ineligible for a period of three weeks and is liable to repay benefits in the amount of $357.”
Dennis v. Employment Division (1986) or “ORS 657.282. ORS 183.482(8)(c) requires that the decision of the EAB be set aside or remanded if the reviewing court “finds that the order is not supported by substantial evidence in the record.”
Miller v. Employment Division (1980) or “On review, we reverse the Court of Appeals because the administrative rule is not authorized by ORS 657.”
Show all 77 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.