Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145 (2026)

Discrimination against individual with disability in real property transactions prohibited; advertising discriminatory preference prohibited; allowance for reasonable modification; assisting discriminatory practices prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      659A.145 Discrimination against individual with disability in real property transactions prohibited; advertising discriminatory preference prohibited; allowance for reasonable modification; assisting discriminatory practices prohibited. (1) As used in this section:

      (a) “Dwelling” has the meaning given that term in ORS 659A.421.

      (b) “Purchaser” has the meaning given that term in ORS 659A.421.

      (2) A person may not discriminate because of a disability of a purchaser, a disability of an individual residing in or intending to reside in a dwelling after it is sold, rented or made available or a disability of any individual associated with a purchaser by doing any of the following:

      (a) Refusing to sell, lease, rent or otherwise make available any real property to a purchaser.

      (b) Expelling a purchaser.

      (c) Making any distinction or restriction against a purchaser in the price, terms, conditions or privileges relating to the sale, rental, lease or occupancy of real property or the furnishing of any facilities or services in connection with the real property.

      (d) Attempting to discourage the sale, rental or lease of any real property.

      (e) Representing that a dwelling is not available for inspection, sale, rental or lease when the dwelling is in fact available for inspection, sale, rental or lease.

      (f) Refusing to permit, at the expense of the individual with a disability, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by the individual if the modifications may be necessary to afford the individual full enjoyment of the premises. However, in the case of a rental, the landlord may, when it is reasonable to do so, condition permission for a reasonable modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.

      (g) Refusing to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices or services when the accommodations may be necessary to afford the individual with a disability equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.

      (h) Failing to design and construct a covered multifamily dwelling as required by the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.).

      (3) A person may not publish, circulate, issue or display or cause to be published, circulated, issued or displayed any communication, notice, advertisement, or sign of any kind relating to the sale, rental or leasing of real property that indicates any preference, limitation, specification or discrimination against an individual on the basis of disability.

      (4) A person whose business includes engaging in residential real estate related transactions, as defined in ORS 659A.421 (3), may not discriminate against any individual in making a transaction available, or in the terms or conditions of the transaction, because of a disability.

      (5) A real estate broker or principal real estate broker may not accept or retain a listing of real property for sale, lease or rental with an understanding that the purchaser, lessee or renter may be discriminated against solely because an individual has a disability.

      (6) A person may not deny access to, or membership or participation in, any multiple listing service, real estate brokers’ organization or other service, organization or facility relating to the business of selling or renting dwellings, or discriminate against any individual in the terms or conditions of the access, membership or participation, because that individual has a disability.

      (7) A person may not assist, induce, incite or coerce another person to commit an act or engage in a practice that violates this section.

      (8) A person may not coerce, intimidate, threaten or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this section.

      (9) A person may not, for profit, induce or attempt to induce any other person to sell or rent any dwelling by representations regarding the entry or prospective entry into the neighborhood of an individual who has a disability.

      (10) In the sale, lease or rental of real property, a person may not disclose to any person that an occupant or owner of the real property has or died from a blood-borne infection.

      (11) Any violation of this section is an unlawful practice. [Formerly 659.430; 2007 c.70 §298; 2007 c.903 §3a; 2008 c.36 §5; 2009 c.109 §1; 2009 c.508 §16; 2019 c.280 §12]

 

UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND REASONABLE

ACCOMMODATION RELATED TO PREGNANCY

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Elk Creek Mgmt. Co. v. Gilbert, 303 P.3d 929 (Or. 2013).
Elk Creek Mgmt. Co. v. Gilbert, 303 P.3d 929 (Or. 2013). · cites it 2× “For example, ORS 659A.145 prohibits a landlord from discriminating “because” of a disability of a tenant by expelling the tenant or by refusing to permit reasonable accommodations necessary to the tenant’s use and enjoyment of the property.”
McLaughlin v. Wilson, 449 P.3d 492 (Or. 2019). “001: “(9) ‘Person’ includes: “(a) One or more individuals, partnerships, associa- tions, labor organizations, limited liability companies, joint stock companies, corporations, legal representatives, trust- ees, trustees in bankruptcy or receivers.”
Fishing Rock Owners' Ass'n v. Roberts, 6 F. Supp. 3d 1132 (D. Or. 2014). · cites it 9× “Defendants David Roberts and Sharon Roberts (“the Roberts”) removed the Association’s claims to federal court and filed three counterclaims alleging disability discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”)(eo-dified in Title VII of the Civil Rights…”
Wilson v. Guardian Mgmt., LLC, 383 F. Supp. 3d 1105 (D. Or. 2019). “Oregon's fair housing law, Oregon Revised Statute § 659A.145, mirrors the FHA and the two statutes are interpreted identically.”
Sanders v. SWS Hilltop, LLC, 309 F. Supp. 3d 877 (D. Or. 2018). “§ 659A.145, mirrors the FHA and the two statutes are interpreted identically.”
Oregon Bureau of Labor & Indus. Ex Rel. Fair Hous. Council of Oregon v. Chandler Apts., LLC, 702 F. App'x 544 (9th Cir. 2017). “Chandler Apartments argues that plaintiffs have not proved the elements of a claim under the FHA and Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(g). 1 To prevail on a claim under 42 U.”
Huston (D. Or. 2026). · cites it 8× “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA, 536 P.3d 1013 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “4 See ORS 659A.145(2)(c) (providing that a person “may not discriminate because of a disability of a purchaser” by “[m]aking any distinction or restriction against a purchaser in the price, terms, conditions or privileges relating to the sale, rental, lease or occupancy of real…”
Kononen (D. Or. 2025). · cites it 5× “She also brings corresponding state law claims under ORS 659A.145 and ORS 659A.421 for housing discrimination due to disability and race and ethnicity.”
Pac. Cmty. Resource Ctr. v. City of Glendale, 994 F. Supp. 2d 1121 (D. Or. 2014). · cites it 8× “§ 1983 , and ORS § 659A.145. Plaintiffs filed this second motion for preliminary injunctive relief (# 37) 2 This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Gibson v. Cmty. Dev. Partners (CDP) (D. Or. 2022). · cites it 4× “4 Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 659A.145, et seq. 5 Or.”
Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “4 See ORS 659A.145(2)(c) (providing that a person “may not discriminate because of a disability of a purchaser” by “[m]aking any distinction or restriction against a purchaser in the price, terms, conditions or privileges relating to the sale, rental, lease or occupancy of real…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2) — 1 case
Elk Creek Mgmt. Co. v. Gilbert, 303 P.3d 929 (Or. 2013). “For example, ORS 659A.145 prohibits a landlord from discriminating “because” of a disability of a tenant by expelling the tenant or by refusing to permit reasonable accommodations necessary to the tenant’s use and enjoyment of the property.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(a) — 1 case
Huston (D. Or. 2026). “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(c) — 3 cases
Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA, 536 P.3d 1013 (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “4 See ORS 659A.145(2)(c) (providing that a person “may not discriminate because of a disability of a purchaser” by “[m]aking any distinction or restriction against a purchaser in the price, terms, conditions or privileges relating to the sale, rental, lease or occupancy of real…”
Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA (Or. Ct. App. 2023). “4 See ORS 659A.145(2)(c) (providing that a person “may not discriminate because of a disability of a purchaser” by “[m]aking any distinction or restriction against a purchaser in the price, terms, conditions or privileges relating to the sale, rental, lease or occupancy of real…”
Kononen (D. Or. 2025). “She also brings corresponding state law claims under ORS 659A.145 and ORS 659A.421 for housing discrimination due to disability and race and ethnicity.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(d) — 1 case
Huston (D. Or. 2026). “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(e) — 1 case
Huston (D. Or. 2026). “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(g) — 1 case
Oregon Bureau of Labor & Indus. Ex Rel. Fair Hous. Council of Oregon v. Chandler Apts., LLC, 702 F. App'x 544 (9th Cir. 2017). “Chandler Apartments argues that plaintiffs have not proved the elements of a claim under the FHA and Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(2)(g). 1 To prevail on a claim under 42 U.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(5) — 1 case
Huston (D. Or. 2026). “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(7) — 1 case
Huston (D. Or. 2026). “§ 3604 ; ORS 659A.145. The protections of the FHA extend to persons “associated with” the renter.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.145(8) — 1 case
Kononen (D. Or. 2025). “She also brings corresponding state law claims under ORS 659A.145 and ORS 659A.421 for housing discrimination due to disability and race and ethnicity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.