Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 659A.825 (2026)

Complaints filed by Attorney General or commissioner; temporary cease and desist orders in certain cases

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

659A.825 Complaints filed by Attorney General or commissioner; temporary cease and desist orders in certain cases. (1)(a) If the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries has reason to believe that any person has committed an unlawful practice, the Attorney General or the commissioner may file a complaint in the same manner as provided for a complaint filed by a person under ORS 659A.820.

(b) If the Attorney General or the commissioner has reason to believe that a violation of ORS 659A.403, 659A.406 or 659A.409 has occurred, the Attorney General or the commissioner may file a complaint under this section against any person acting on behalf of a place of public accommodation and against any person who has aided or abetted in that violation.

(c) If the Attorney General or the commissioner has reason to believe that an unlawful practice under ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or discrimination under federal housing law has occurred or is about to occur, the Attorney General or the commissioner may file a complaint in the same manner as a person filing a complaint under ORS 659A.820.

(2) If the commissioner files a complaint under this section alleging an unlawful practice other than an unlawful employment practice, or if a person files a complaint under ORS 659A.820 alleging an unlawful practice under ORS 659A.145 or 659A.421 or discrimination under federal housing law, the commissioner may also issue a temporary cease and desist order requiring any respondent named in the complaint to refrain from the unlawful practice alleged. A temporary cease and desist order under this section may contain any provision that could be included in a cease and desist order issued after a hearing under ORS 659A.850. [2001 c.621 §3; 2008 c.36 §8]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Frehoo, Inc. v. BOLI, 510 P.3d 888 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Frehoo, Inc. v. BOLI, 510 P.3d 888 (Or. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “BOLI’s commissioner subsequently filed a complaint under ORS 659A.825 in which he alleged that Frehoo had employed two individuals (AP1 and AP2) who were under the age of 16, and that the conditions of their employment con- stituted sexual harassment under OAR 839-005-0030 and…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.