Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 662.805 (2026)

Definitions for ORS 662.805 to 662.825

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      662.805 Definitions for ORS 662.805 to 662.825. As used in ORS 662.805 to 662.825, unless the context requires otherwise:

      (1) “Labor dispute” includes any controversy between an employer and a regular employee of that employer concerning terms or conditions of employment, or concerning the association or representation of persons in negotiating, fixing, maintaining, changing or seeking to arrange terms or conditions of employment.

      (2) “Perishable agricultural crops” means those products of agriculture that, because of their inherent qualities or dependence upon conditions of soil or weather, mature, decompose, decay or deteriorate and in so doing undergo material changes of form and quality that render them unsuitable for the use for which they were produced.

      (3) “Regular employee” means a person who has been employed by the employer for at least six calendar work days. [1963 c.543 §2; 2007 c.71 §217]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1997 · leading case: Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990). · cites it 11× “Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment in their favor declaring ORS 662.805, et seq., unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth amendments.”
Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc., 935 P.2d 469 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Also in 1961, the legislature enacted ORS 662.805 to ORS 662.825. These statutes make it unlawful for individuals other than regularly employed employees to picket or cause to be picketed any farm, ranch or orchard where perishable agricultural crops are produced while such…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 662.805(3) — 1 case
Pineros Y Campesinos Unidos Del Noroeste v. Goldschmidt, 790 F. Supp. 216 (D. Or. 1990). “Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment in their favor declaring ORS 662.805, et seq., unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth amendments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.