Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.080 (2026)

Prohibited acts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      677.080 Prohibited acts. A person may not:

      (1) Knowingly make any false statement or representation on a matter, or willfully conceal any fact material to the right of the person to practice medicine or to obtain a license under this chapter.

      (2) Sell or fraudulently obtain or furnish any medical and surgical diploma, license, record or registration, or aid or abet in the same.

      (3) Impersonate anyone to whom a license has been granted by the Oregon Medical Board.

      (4) Except as provided in ORS 676.347, 677.060 and 677.137, practice medicine in this state without a license required by this chapter. [Formerly 677.050; 1983 c.486 §5; 2022 c.62 §2; 2023 c.147 §1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2021 · leading case: Campbell v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 518 P.2d 1042 (Or. Ct. App. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Campbell v. Bd. of Med. Examiners, 518 P.2d 1042 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 3× “100 (1) (e) and ORS 677.080 (1) and (4) amounted to a denial of due process of law.”
Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'n, 421 P.3d 385 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “160 ("Except as provided in this section, a person may not practice law in this state, or represent that the person is qualified to practice law in this state, unless the person is an active member of the Oregon State Bar.”
Sachdev v. Oregon Med. Bd., 494 P.3d 1018 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “e affected by the indi- vidual action”; (2) “the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the proba- ble value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safe- guards”; and (3) “the Government’s interest, including the function…”
Oregon State Bar v. Smith, 942 P.2d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 1997). “160 and the corollary legal licensing statutes are no different from other professional licensing and regulatory schemes.”
Klein v. Real Est. Comm'r Holbrook, 528 P.2d 1355 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). “-100 (1) (e) and ORS 677.080 (1) and (4) amounted to a denial of due process of law.”
State v. Won, 528 P.2d 594 (Or. Ct. App. 1974). “ORS 677.080 (4). He appeals from the resulting judgment, assigning as sole error denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 677.080(4) — 2 cases
Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'n, 421 P.3d 385 (Or. Ct. App. 2018). “160 ("Except as provided in this section, a person may not practice law in this state, or represent that the person is qualified to practice law in this state, unless the person is an active member of the Oregon State Bar.”
Sachdev v. Oregon Med. Bd., 494 P.3d 1018 (Or. Ct. App. 2021). “e affected by the indi- vidual action”; (2) “the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the proba- ble value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safe- guards”; and (3) “the Government’s interest, including the function…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.