Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 679.160 (2026)

Appeal from board decision

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      679.160 Appeal from board decision. (1) Any licensee who has been disciplined by the Oregon Board of Dentistry may obtain judicial review of the decision in the manner prescribed by ORS chapter 183.

      (2) Notwithstanding ORS 676.210, enforcement of the board’s disciplinary order pending appeal shall be determined pursuant to ORS 183.482 (3). [Amended by 1961 c.311 §3; 1967 c.282 §3; 1973 c.390 §6; 1977 c.192 §4; 1979 c.744 §54; 1983 c.169 §13; 1995 c.199 §3; 2003 c.83 §6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–2012 · leading case: Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists, 293 P.3d 1023 (Or. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists, 293 P.3d 1023 (Or. 2012). · cites it 3× “320, applicable to the State Board of Examination and Registration of Graduate Nurses, provided for appeal to the circuit court, which was to consider the board’s record and “such other evidence or testimony that either party may offer”; ORS 689.”
Hurley v. Oregon State Bd., 562 P.2d 1229 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “1 ORS 679.160(1); 183.480. On five occasions during 1973 and 1974, petitioner submitted claims to various dental insurance companies seeking payment for work which he had not in fact performed.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 679.160(1): 1 case
Hurley v. Oregon State Bd., 562 P.2d 1229 (Or. Ct. App. 1977). “1 ORS 679.160(1); 183.480. On five occasions during 1973 and 1974, petitioner submitted claims to various dental insurance companies seeking payment for work which he had not in fact performed.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 679.160(3): 1 case
Weldon v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists, 293 P.3d 1023 (Or. 2012). “320, applicable to the State Board of Examination and Registration of Graduate Nurses, provided for appeal to the circuit court, which was to consider the board’s record and “such other evidence or testimony that either party may offer”; ORS 689.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.