Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 743.035 (2026)

Uniform prior authorization form for prescription drug benefits; consultation with Oregon Health Authority; rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      743.035 Uniform prior authorization form for prescription drug benefits; consultation with Oregon Health Authority; rules. (1) The Department of Consumer and Business Services, in consultation with the Oregon Health Authority, shall develop by rule a form that providers in this state shall use to request prior authorization for prescription drug benefits. The form must:

      (a) Be uniform for all providers;

      (b) Not exceed two pages;

      (c) Be electronically available and transmissible; and

      (d) Include a provision under which additional information may be requested and provided.

      (2) If a person described in ORS 743.029 (2) requires prior authorization for prescription drug benefits, the person must allow the use of the form developed under subsection (1) of this section.

      (3) The department may adopt rules to implement this section. [Formerly 743.065; 2021 c.154 §9]

 

      Note: Definitions for 743.035 may be found in 743B.001.

 

      Note: 743.035 was added to and made a part of the Insurance Code by legislative action but was not added to ORS chapter 743 or any series therein. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.

 

      743.036 [Formerly 736.330; 1973 c.823 §149; repealed by 1973 c.827 §83]

 

      743.037 [1973 c.521 §2; renumbered 743.721 in 1989]

 

HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Emp. Benefits Ins. Co., 667 P.2d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Emp. Benefits Ins. Co., 667 P.2d 567 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “" How strange! It is for precisely that reason that the agreement should be held unenforceable, because one of the very clear purposes of ORS 743.035 and 743.045 is to prevent a party, such as this plaintiff, from securing an advantage in rates that is not available to members…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.