Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108 (2026)

 Defenses, liability and protection of transferee or obligee.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 5108.  Defenses, liability and protection of transferee or obligee.

(a)  Certain transfers or obligations not voidable.--A transfer or obligation is not voidable under section 5104(a)(1) (relating to transfer or obligation voidable as to present or future creditor) against a person that took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value given the debtor or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.

(b)  Judgment for certain voidable transfers.--To the extent a transfer is avoidable in an action by a creditor under section 5107(a)(1) (relating to remedies of creditor), the following rules apply:

(1)  Except as otherwise provided in this section, the creditor may recover judgment for the value of the asset transferred, as adjusted under subsection (c), or the amount necessary to satisfy the creditor's claim, whichever is less. The judgment may be entered against:

(i)  the first transferee of the asset or the person for whose benefit the transfer was made; or

(ii)  an immediate or mediate transferee of the first transferee, other than:

(A)  a good faith transferee that took for value; or

(B)  an immediate or mediate good faith transferee of a person described in clause (A).

(2)  Recovery under section 5107(a)(1) or (b) of or from the asset transferred or its proceeds, by levy or otherwise, is available only against a person described in paragraph (1).

(c)  Measure of recovery.--If the judgment under subsection (b) is based upon the value of the asset transferred, the judgment must be for an amount equal to the value of the asset at the time of the transfer, subject to adjustment as the equities may require.

(d)  Rights of good faith transferee or obligee.--Notwithstanding voidability of a transfer or an obligation under this chapter, a good faith transferee or obligee is entitled, to the extent of the value given the debtor for the transfer or obligation, to:

(1)  a lien on or a right to retain an interest in the asset transferred;

(2)  enforcement of an obligation incurred; or

(3)  a reduction in the amount of the liability on the judgment.

(e)  Certain transfers not voidable.--A transfer is not voidable under section 5104(a)(2) or 5105 (relating to transfer or obligation voidable as to present creditor) if the transfer results from:

(1)  termination of a lease upon default by the debtor when the termination is pursuant to the lease and applicable law; or

(2)  enforcement of a security interest in compliance with 13 Pa.C.S. Div. 9 (relating to secured transactions), other than an acceptance of collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the obligations it secures under 13 Pa.C.S. § 9620 (relating to acceptance of collateral in full or partial satisfaction of obligation; compulsory disposition of collateral).

The references to 13 Pa.C.S. Div. 9 and 13 Pa.C.S. § 9620 in paragraph (2) shall also be deemed to refer to the corresponding provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in any other jurisdiction.

(f)  Burden of proof.--The following rules determine the burden of proving matters referred to in this section:

(1)  A party that seeks to invoke subsection (a), (d) or (e) has the burden of proving the applicability of that subsection.

(2)  Except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), the creditor has the burden of proving each applicable element of subsection (b) or (c).

(3)  The transferee has the burden of proving the applicability to the transferee of subsection (b)(1)(ii)(A) or (B).

(4)  A party that seeks adjustment under subsection (c) has the burden of proving the adjustment.

(g)  Standard of proof.--The standard of proof required to establish matters referred to in this section is preponderance of the evidence.

(June 8, 2001, P.L.123, No.18, eff. July 1, 2001; Dec. 22, 2017, P.L.1249, No.78, eff. 60 days)

 

2017 Amendment.  See section 7 of Act 78 in the appendix to this title for special provisions relating to applicability.

Cross References.  Section 5108 is referred to in section 5107 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Xtreme Caged Combat v. Zarros, M., 247 A.3d 42 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Xtreme Caged Combat v. Zarros, M., 247 A.3d 42 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 3× “12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(b) (in effect July 1, 2001 to February 19, 2018); see also Farhat, 74 A.”
Deborah Klein v. Douglas Weidner, 729 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “In turn, 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108 (“Defenses, liability and protection of transferee”) includes the following subsection: (b) Judgment for certain voidable transfers.”
United States v. Rocky Mountain Holdings, Inc., 782 F. Supp. 2d 106 (E.D. Pa. 2011). · cites it 3× “See 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. § 5108 cmt. 2 (“The value of the asset transferred is limited to the value of the levyable interest of the transferor, exclusive of any interest encumbered by a valid lien.”
Feldman v. Chase Home Fin. (In Re Image Masters, Inc.), 421 B.R. 164 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 548 (c) 22 and 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(a) *181 & (d). 23 Defendants maintain that these Counts therefore fail to state claims for avoidance of intentionally fraudulent transfers that are plausible on their face.”
Tiab Commc'ns Corp. v. Keymarket of Nepa, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 2d 925 (M.D. Penn. 2003). · cites it 4× “” 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108, cmt. 6 (1993).”
Titus v. Shearer, 498 B.R. 508 (W.D. Pa. 2013). · cites it 2× “Titus was *522 a “transferee” within the meaning of 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. § 5108. These issues of statutory interpretation present questions of law and are reviewed de novo by this court.”
Image Masters, Inc. v. Chase Home Fin., 489 B.R. 375 (E.D. Pa. 2013). “Under the relevant statutes, a transferee may avoid liability in an action to avoid a transfer based upon actual fraud by demonstrating that it received the transfer for value and in good faith.”
Hecht v. Malvern Preparatory Sch., 716 F. Supp. 2d 395 (E.D. Pa. 2010). “” 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108, Committee Comment No. 1.”
718 Arch Street Assocs., Ltd. v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.), 213 B.R. 67 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1997). “interests, citing 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(e)(2); (2) the transfers were necessary to preserve the operations of Philly Rock, for the benefit of all of its creditors, citing In re Miller, 39 F.”
Carroll v. Stettler, 941 F. Supp. 2d 572 (E.D. Pa. 2013). “12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108 (a); see also 12 Pa.”
Liebersohn v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc. (In re C.F. Foods, L.P.), 280 B.R. 103 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2002). “§ 5104 infra, and Comments (1) and (6) to 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108 infra. Except for points specifically addressed, these matters are left to the courts to determine, giving appropriate consideration to, among other things, the policy of construing uniform laws to make uniform the laws…”
In Re Blatstein, 244 B.R. 290 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2000). “We next pass on to determine (1) whether a judgment should be entered against Lori for the income fraudulently received by her in her accounts; (2) whether judgment should be entered, jointly and severally, against the Blatsteins; and (3) whether further equitable remedies are…”
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(a) — 6 cases
Feldman v. Chase Home Fin. (In Re Image Masters, Inc.), 421 B.R. 164 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2009). “§ 548 (c) 22 and 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(a) *181 & (d). 23 Defendants maintain that these Counts therefore fail to state claims for avoidance of intentionally fraudulent transfers that are plausible on their face.”
Deborah Klein v. Douglas Weidner, 729 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2013). “In turn, 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108 (“Defenses, liability and protection of transferee”) includes the following subsection: (b) Judgment for certain voidable transfers.”
Image Masters, Inc. v. Chase Home Fin., 489 B.R. 375 (E.D. Pa. 2013). “Under the relevant statutes, a transferee may avoid liability in an action to avoid a transfer based upon actual fraud by demonstrating that it received the transfer for value and in good faith.”
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(b) — 7 cases
Xtreme Caged Combat v. Zarros, M., 247 A.3d 42 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). “12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(b) (in effect July 1, 2001 to February 19, 2018); see also Farhat, 74 A.”
United States v. Rocky Mountain Holdings, Inc., 782 F. Supp. 2d 106 (E.D. Pa. 2011). “See 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. § 5108 cmt. 2 (“The value of the asset transferred is limited to the value of the levyable interest of the transferor, exclusive of any interest encumbered by a valid lien.”
Tiab Commc'ns Corp. v. Keymarket of Nepa, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 2d 925 (M.D. Penn. 2003). “” 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108, cmt. 6 (1993).”
In Re Blatstein, 244 B.R. 290 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2000). “We next pass on to determine (1) whether a judgment should be entered against Lori for the income fraudulently received by her in her accounts; (2) whether judgment should be entered, jointly and severally, against the Blatsteins; and (3) whether further equitable remedies are…”
Xtreme Caged Combat v. Zarros, M., 2021 Pa. Super. 29 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(b)(1) — 1 case
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(b)(2) — 2 cases
Foster v. Demk, LLC (E.D. Pa. 2023).
Attias v. 532 Brooklyn, LLC (E.D. Pa. 2023).
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(c) — 2 cases
Deborah Klein v. Douglas Weidner, 729 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2013). “In turn, 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108 (“Defenses, liability and protection of transferee”) includes the following subsection: (b) Judgment for certain voidable transfers.”
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(d)(3) — 1 case
Tiab Commc'ns Corp. v. Keymarket of Nepa, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 2d 925 (M.D. Penn. 2003). “” 12 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 5108, cmt. 6 (1993).”
— 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5108(e)(2) — 1 case
718 Arch Street Assocs., Ltd. v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.), 213 B.R. 67 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1997). “interests, citing 12 Pa.C.S. § 5108(e)(2); (2) the transfers were necessary to preserve the operations of Philly Rock, for the benefit of all of its creditors, citing In re Miller, 39 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.