Pa. Cons. Stat. » 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. (CORPORATIONS) / Chapter 19
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1 (2026)

 Limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain mergers or consolidations.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 1929.1.  Limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain mergers or consolidations.

(a)  Limitation on successor asbestos-related liabilities.--

(1)  Except as further limited in paragraph (2), the cumulative successor asbestos-related liabilities of a domestic business corporation that was incorporated in this Commonwealth prior to May 1, 2001, shall be limited to the fair market value of the total assets of the transferor determined as of the time of the merger or consolidation, and such corporation shall have no responsibility for successor asbestos-related liabilities in excess of such limitation.

(2)  If the transferor had assumed or incurred successor asbestos-related liabilities in connection with a prior merger or consolidation with a prior transferor, then the fair market value of the total assets of the prior transferor, determined as of the time of such earlier merger or consolidation, shall be substituted for the limitation set forth in paragraph (1) for purposes of determining the limitation of liability of a domestic business corporation.

(b)  Limitation on total assets available to satisfy successor asbestos-related liabilities.--

(1)  Except as further limited in paragraph (2), the assets of a domestic business corporation that was incorporated in this Commonwealth prior to May 1, 2001, shall be exempt from restraint, attachment or execution on judgments related to claims for successor asbestos-related liabilities if the cumulative amounts which, after the time of the merger or consolidation as to which the fair market value of total assets is determined for purposes of this subsection and subsection (a), are paid or committed to be paid by or on behalf of the corporation, or by or on behalf of a transferor, in connection with settlements, judgments or other discharges of claims of asbestos-related liabilities exceed the fair market value of the total assets of the transferor, determined as of the time of the merger or consolidation.

(2)  If the transferor had assumed or incurred successor asbestos-related liabilities in connection with a prior merger or consolidation with a prior transferor, then the fair market value of the total assets of the prior transferor, determined as of the time of such earlier merger or consolidation, shall be substituted for the limitation set forth in paragraph (1) for purposes of determining the extent of the exemption of the assets of a domestic business corporation.

(c)  Fair market value of total assets.--

(1)  A domestic business corporation may establish the fair market value of total assets through any method reasonable under the circumstances, including by reference to the going concern value of such assets or to the purchase price attributable to or paid for such assets in an arm's length transaction, or, in the absence of other readily available information from which fair market value can be determined, by reference to the value of such assets recorded on a balance sheet. Total assets shall include intangible assets. A showing by the domestic business corporation of a reasonable determination of the fair market value of total assets shall be prima facie evidence of their fair market value.

(2)  Once a reasonable determination of the fair market value of total assets has been thus established by a domestic business corporation, a claimant disputing that determination of value shall then have the burden of establishing a different fair market value of such assets.

(3)  For the purpose of adjusting the limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) to account for the passage of time, the fair market value of total assets at the time of a merger or consolidation shall be increased annually until the earlier of:

(i)  the date of the settlement, judgment or other discharge to which the limitations in subsection (a) or (b) are being applied; or

(ii)  the date on which such adjusted fair market value is first exceeded by the cumulative amounts paid or committed to be paid by or on behalf of the corporation, or by or on behalf of a transferor, after the time of the merger or consolidation as to which the fair market value of total assets is determined for purposes of subsections (a) and (b) in connection with settlements, judgments or other discharges of the successor asbestos-related liabilities;

at the rate equal to the prime rate as listed in the first edition of the Wall Street Journal published for each calendar year since such merger or consolidation, plus 1%, not compounded.

(d)  Application.--

(1)  The limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to mergers or consolidations effected under the laws of this Commonwealth or another jurisdiction consummated prior to May 1, 2001.

(2)  The limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to all asbestos claims, including existing asbestos claims, and all litigation, including existing litigation, and shall apply to successors of a domestic business corporation to which this section applies.

(3)  The limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to workers' compensation benefits paid by or on behalf of an employer to an employee pursuant to the act of June 2, 1915 (P.L.736, No.338), known as the Workers' Compensation Act, or comparable workers' compensation law of another jurisdiction.

(4)  The limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to any claim against a domestic business corporation that does not constitute a successor asbestos-related liability.

(5)  This section shall not apply to an insurance corporation as defined in section 3102 (relating to definitions).

(6)  The limitations set forth in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to any obligations arising under the National Labor Relations Act (49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.) or under any collective bargaining agreement.

(e)  Definitions.--As used in this section, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this subsection:

"Asbestos claim."  Any claim, wherever or whenever made, for damages, losses, indemnification, contribution or other relief arising out of, based on or in any way related to asbestos, including property damage caused by the installation, presence or removal of asbestos, the health effects of exposure to asbestos, including any claim for personal injury, death, mental or emotional injury, risk of disease or other injury or the costs of medical monitoring or surveillance. The term shall also include any claim made by or on behalf of any person exposed to asbestos or any representative, spouse, parent, child or other relative of any such person.

"Successor asbestos-related liabilities."  Any liabilities, whether known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, absolute or contingent, accrued or unaccrued, liquidated or unliquidated or due or to become due, related in any way to asbestos claims, that were assumed or incurred by a domestic business corporation or foreign business corporation as a result of or in connection with a merger or consolidation, or the plan of merger or consolidation related thereto, with or into another domestic business corporation or foreign business corporation effected under the laws of this Commonwealth or another jurisdiction or which are related in any way to asbestos claims based on the exercise of control or the ownership of stock of such corporation prior to such merger or consolidation. The term shall also include liabilities which, after the time of the merger or consolidation as to which the fair market value of total assets is determined for purposes of subsections (a) and (b), were or are paid or otherwise discharged, or committed to be paid or otherwise discharged, by or on behalf of the corporation, or by or on behalf of a transferor, in connection with settlements, judgments or other discharges in this Commonwealth or another jurisdiction.

"Transferor."  A domestic business corporation or foreign business corporation from which successor asbestos-related liabilities are assumed or incurred.

(Dec. 17, 2001, P.L.904, No.101, eff. imd.)

 

2001 Amendment.  Act 101 added section 1929.1.

Cross References.  Section 1929.1 is referred to in sections 8128, 8368.1, 8368.6 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 2002–2015 · leading case: Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). · cites it 26× “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Johnson v. Am. Stand., 8 A.3d 318 (Pa. 2010). · cites it 8× “" The Act, now codified at 15 Pa. C.S. § 1929.1, generally caps a successor corporation's asbestos-related liability at the fair market value of the succeeded company at the time of the merger or consolidation (here, $7 million).”
Markovsky, J. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 107 A.3d 749 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 8× “Section 8128 was amended by the addition of subsection (c), which now is in effect and provides "[t]he provisions of this Section shall also apply to the limitations set forth in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (relating to limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain…”
Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 966 A.2d 611 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 4× “I believe that the Burgers have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Crown Cork Statute, 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. I also believe that the Crown Cork Statute both violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution [1] and its application represents a denial…”
Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 268 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “[9] Similar legislation passed in Pennsylvania, see 15 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 1929.1 (West 2001), was declared unconstitutional by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court under the open-courts provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 335 S.W.3d 126 (Tex. 2010). “15 Pa. Cons.Stat. Ann. § 1929.1 (West. 2010).”
In re Asbestos Litig., 59 Pa. D. & C.4th 62 (2002). · cites it 3× “” 15 Pa.C.S. §1929.1. The operational aspect of the bill is found in paragraph (a)(1): “(1) Except as further limited in paragraph (2), the cumulative successor asbestos-related liabilities of a domestic business corporation that was incorporated in this Commonwealth prior to…”
Johnson v. Am. Stand., 966 A.2d 573 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “Thus, Johnson has been denied equal protection of the law due to the operation of 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. Not only has equal protection been violated as regarding the Fourteenth Amendment and Article 1, section 26 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, but the application of section…”
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 251 S.W.3d 520 (Tex. App. 2006). “See 15 Pa. C.S. § 1929.1 (2004); Miss.Code Ann.”
Vanaman v. DAP, Inc., 966 A.2d 603 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009). “: ¶ 1 While I agree with the majority regarding the disposition of the DAP aspect of this matter, in accordance with my pre *611 viously stated position regarding standing and the constitutionality of the Crown Cork and Seal Act, 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1, I must dissent. ¶ 2 Because…”
Wygant, E. v. Gen. Elec., 113 A.3d 310 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “The legislature's intent to treat wrongful death cases like survival actions for purposes of the statute of limitations is further evidenced by its definition of an asbestos claim in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1, incorporated by reference in 5524.”
Johnson v. Am. Stand., 982 A.2d 1223 (Pa. 2009). “The issue, rephrased for clarity, is: Whether petitioners have standing to raise constitutional challenges to 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 based upon its alleged violation of the Commerce Clause and Equal Protection Clause.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(a) — 1 case
Johnson v. Am. Stand., 8 A.3d 318 (Pa. 2010). “" The Act, now codified at 15 Pa. C.S. § 1929.1, generally caps a successor corporation's asbestos-related liability at the fair market value of the succeeded company at the time of the merger or consolidation (here, $7 million).”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(a)(1) — 3 cases
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Johnson v. Am. Stand., 8 A.3d 318 (Pa. 2010). “" The Act, now codified at 15 Pa. C.S. § 1929.1, generally caps a successor corporation's asbestos-related liability at the fair market value of the succeeded company at the time of the merger or consolidation (here, $7 million).”
Markovsky, J. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 107 A.3d 749 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “Section 8128 was amended by the addition of subsection (c), which now is in effect and provides "[t]he provisions of this Section shall also apply to the limitations set forth in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (relating to limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain…”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(a)(2) — 2 cases
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Markovsky, J. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 107 A.3d 749 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “Section 8128 was amended by the addition of subsection (c), which now is in effect and provides "[t]he provisions of this Section shall also apply to the limitations set forth in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (relating to limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain…”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(b) — 1 case
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(c) — 1 case
In re Asbestos Litig., 59 Pa. D. & C.4th 62 (2002). “” 15 Pa.C.S. §1929.1. The operational aspect of the bill is found in paragraph (a)(1): “(1) Except as further limited in paragraph (2), the cumulative successor asbestos-related liabilities of a domestic business corporation that was incorporated in this Commonwealth prior to…”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(d)(1) — 2 cases
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Markovsky, J. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 107 A.3d 749 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “Section 8128 was amended by the addition of subsection (c), which now is in effect and provides "[t]he provisions of this Section shall also apply to the limitations set forth in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (relating to limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain…”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(d)(5) — 1 case
Markovsky, J. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., 107 A.3d 749 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “Section 8128 was amended by the addition of subsection (c), which now is in effect and provides "[t]he provisions of this Section shall also apply to the limitations set forth in 15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1 (relating to limitations on asbestos-related liabilities relating to certain…”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(d)(l) — 1 case
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
— 15 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 1929.1(e) — 1 case
Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP., 842 A.2d 919 (Pa. 2004). “15 Pa.C.S. § 1929.1. [1] For all the reasons that follow, we hold that the Statute is unconstitutional as applied under Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.