Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107 (2026)

 Deceptive or fraudulent business practices.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 4107.  Deceptive or fraudulent business practices.

(a)  Offense defined.--A person commits an offense if, in the course of business, the person:

(1)  uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure, or any other device for falsely determining or recording any quality or quantity;

(2)  sells, offers or exposes for sale, or delivers less than the represented quantity of any commodity or service;

(3)  takes or attempts to take more than the represented quantity of any commodity or service when as buyer he furnishes the weight or measure;

(4)  sells, offers or exposes for sale adulterated or mislabeled commodities. As used in this paragraph, the term "adulterated" means varying from the standard of composition or quality prescribed by or pursuant to any statute providing criminal penalties for such variance or set by established commercial usage. As used in this paragraph, the term "mislabeled" means varying from the standard of trust or disclosure in labeling prescribed by or pursuant to any statute providing criminal penalties for such variance or set by established commercial usage;

(5)  makes a false or misleading statement in any advertisement addressed to the public or to a substantial segment thereof for the purpose of promoting the purchase or sale of property or services;

(6)  makes or induces others to rely on a false or misleading written statement for the purpose of obtaining property or credit;

(7)  makes or induces others to rely on a false or misleading written statement for the purpose of promoting the sale of securities, or omits information required by law to be disclosed in written documents relating to securities;

(8)  makes or induces others to rely on a false or misleading material statement to induce an investor to invest in a business venture. The offense is complete when any false or misleading material statement is communicated to an investor regardless of whether any investment is made. For purposes of grading, the "amount involved" is the amount or value of the investment solicited or paid, whichever is greater. As used in this paragraph, the following words and phrases shall mean: "Amount" as used in the definition of "material statement" includes currency values and comparative expressions of value, including, but not limited to, percentages or multiples. "Business venture" means any venture represented to an investor as one where he may receive compensation either from the sale of a product, from the investment of other investors or from any other commercial enterprise. "Compensation" means anything of value received or to be received by an investor. "Invest" means to pay, give or lend money, property, service or other thing of value for the opportunity to receive compensation. The term also includes payment for the purchase of a product. "Investment" means the money, property, service or other thing of value paid or given, or to be paid or given, for the opportunity to receive compensation. "Investor" means any natural person, partnership, corporation, limited liability company, business trust, other association, government entity, estate, trust, foundation or other entity solicited to invest in a business venture, regardless of whether any investment is made. "Material statement" means a statement about any matter which could affect an investor's decision to invest in a business venture, including, but not limited to, statements about:

(i)  the existence, value, availability or marketability of a product;

(ii)  the number of former or current investors, the amount of their investments or the amount of their former or current compensation;

(iii)  the available pool or number of prospective investors, including those who have not yet been solicited and those who already have been solicited but have not yet made an investment;

(iv)  representations of future compensation to be received by investors or prospective investors; or

(v)  the source of former, current or future compensation paid or to be paid to investors or prospective investors.

"Product" means a good, a service or other tangible or intangible property of any kind;

(9)  obtains or attempts to obtain property of another by false or misleading representations made through communications conducted in whole or in part by telephone involving the following:

(i)  express or implied claims that the person contacted has won or is about to win a prize;

(ii)  express or implied claims that the person contacted may be able to recover any losses suffered in connection with a prize promotion; or

(iii)  express or implied claims regarding the value of goods or services offered in connection with a prize or a prize promotion.

As used in this paragraph, the term "prize" means anything of value offered or purportedly offered. The term "prize promotion" means an oral or written express or implied representation that a person has won, has been selected to receive or may be eligible to receive a prize or purported prize;

(10)  knowingly makes a false or misleading statement in a privacy policy, published on the Internet or otherwise distributed or published, regarding the use of personal information submitted by members of the public; or

(11)  does either of the following when the person is in a client relationship with a certified public accountant, public accountant or public accounting firm:

(i)  provides false or misleading information to the certified public accountant, public accountant or public accounting firm in connection with performance of an attestation function for the client which results in an attestation by the certified public accountant, public accountant or public accounting firm of a materially misleading financial statement, audit, review or other document; or

(ii)  fails to provide information to the certified public accountant, public accountant or public accounting firm which the person knows is material to the performance of an attestation function and which results in an attestation by the certified public accountant, public accountant or public accounting firm of a materially misleading financial statement, audit, review or other document.

(a.1)  Grading of offenses.--

(1)  A violation of this section, except for subsection (a)(10), constitutes:

(i)  a felony of the third degree if the amount involved exceeds $2,000;

(ii)  a misdemeanor of the first degree if the amount involved is $200 or more but $2,000 or less;

(iii)  a misdemeanor of the second degree if the amount involved is less than $200; or

(iv)  when the amount involved cannot be satisfactorily ascertained, the offense constitutes a misdemeanor of the second degree.

(2)  Amounts involved in deceptive or fraudulent business practices pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct, whether from the same person or several persons, may be aggregated in determining the grade of the offense.

(3)  Where a person commits an offense under subsection (a) and the victim of the offense is 60 years of age or older, the grading of the offense shall be one grade higher than specified in paragraph (1).

(4)  An offense under subsection (a)(10) shall be a summary offense and shall be punishable by a fine not less than $50 and not to exceed $500.

(a.2)  Jurisdiction.--

(1)  The district attorneys of the several counties shall have the authority to investigate and to institute criminal proceedings for any violation of this section.

(2)  In addition to the authority conferred upon the Attorney General by the act of October 15, 1980 (P.L.950, No.164), known as the Commonwealth Attorneys Act, the Attorney General shall have the authority to investigate and to institute criminal proceedings for any violation of this section or any series of such violations involving more than one county of this Commonwealth or involving any county of this Commonwealth and another state. No person charged with a violation of this section by the Attorney General shall have standing to challenge the authority of the Attorney General to investigate or prosecute the case, and, if any such challenge is made, the challenge shall be dismissed and no relief shall be available in the courts of this Commonwealth to the person making the challenge.

(b)  Defenses.--It is a defense to prosecution under this section if the defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that his conduct was not knowingly or recklessly deceptive.

(c)  Exceptions.--Subsection (a)(10) shall not apply to the activities of:

(1)  A financial institution as defined by section 509(3) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Public Law 106-102, 15 U.S.C. § 6809(3)) or regulations adopted by agencies as designated by section 504(a) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. § 6804(a)) and subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 U.S.C. § 6801 et seq.).

(2)  A covered entity as defined by regulations promulgated at 45 CFR Pts. 160 (relating to general administration requirements) and 164 (relating to security and privacy) pursuant to Subtitle F of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-191, 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq.).

(3)  A licensee or person subject to 31 Pa. Code Ch. 146a (relating to privacy of consumer financial information) or 146b (relating to privacy of consumer health information).

(Dec. 4, 1996, P.L.902, No.145, eff. 60 days; April 5, 2004, P.L.211, No.26, eff. 60 days; Nov. 30, 2004, P.L.1592, No.202, eff. 60 days; Dec. 8, 2004, P.L.1781, No.234, eff. 60 days)

 

2004 Amendments.  Act 234 overlooked the amendment by Act 202, but the amendments do not conflict in substance and have both been given effect in setting forth the text of section 4107.

Cross References.  Section 4107 is referred to in section 5552 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Succi, 173 A.3d 269 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Commonwealth v. Succi, 173 A.3d 269 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “3922 (Theft by Deception) or 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107 (Deceptive or Fraudulent Business Practices).”
Commonwealth v. Snyder, 483 A.2d 933 (Pa. 1984). “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107(a)(6). There was sufficient evidence of Clampers’s intent to commit theft by deception and deceptive business practices even though much of the work done for the Eckerts was legitimate and therefore some portion of the payment obtained from them was not…”
Marcus v. Diulus, 363 A.2d 1205 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976). “(1973); Deceptive business practices, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107 (1973); Theft by deception, 18 Pa.”
In Re Miller, 759 A.2d 455 (Ct. Jud. Disc. Pa 2002). · cites it 2× “[5] See 18 Pa.C.S. Section 4107. [6] See n. 2 infra.”
Baumgardner Oil Co. v. Commonwealth, 606 A.2d 617 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1992). “Charges numbered 7 and 8 are violations of Sections 4107 and 903, respectively, of the Crimes Code, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107 and § 903. 6 . One generator of used oil, Metropolitan Edison, charged Baumgardner a fee to collect the used oil.”
Difiore v. CSL Behring, U.S., LLC, 171 F. Supp. 3d 383 (E.D. Pa. 2016). “Plaintiff argues that she was discharged for refusing to engage in “illegal off-label marketing, defrauding investors, and defrauding the FDA” in violation of 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107 . Pl.’s Mem. Opp.”
Commonwealth v. Kolovich, 170 A.3d 520 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 10× “Robert Kolovich appeals from his judgment of sentence of twenty-seven to seventy-two months imprisonment, which was imposed following his conviction of six counts of theft by deception, and twelve counts of deceptive business practices pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. 1 We affirm.…”
Heffler v. Joe Bells Auto Serv., 946 F. Supp. 348 (E.D. Pa. 1996). “§§ 7131-7139 (1983) (“State Odometer Act”); (3) Pennsylvania law against fraudulent misrepresentation and express warranty; (4) 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 4107 (1972) (“Pennsylvania State Deceptive Practices Act”); and (5) 75 Pa.”
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “24, 1976, P.L. 1166, as amended, 73 P.S. § 201-2(4)(vii), (viii), (ix).”
Commonwealth v. J. P. Mascaro & Sons, Inc., 402 A.2d 1050 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979). “18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. 3 . 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904.”
Com. v. Kolovich, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 7× “Appellant’s third issue is a challenge to the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash the Commonwealth’s petition seeking leave to amend the information to add new charges under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107, a statute which he maintained was constitutionally infirm.”
Com. v. Rauso, G. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 5× “J-S27021-18 2 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. * * * On August 10, 2011, [Appellant] entered a counseled, negotiated guilty plea to Information B-Theft by Deception, a felony of the third degree, and Information E-Deceptive Business Practices, also a third degree felony.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(6) — 1 case
Com. v. Adbullah-Talib, H. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(A)(6) — 1 case
Com. v. Adbullah-Talib, H. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a) — 4 cases
Commonwealth v. Kolovich, 170 A.3d 520 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “Robert Kolovich appeals from his judgment of sentence of twenty-seven to seventy-two months imprisonment, which was imposed following his conviction of six counts of theft by deception, and twelve counts of deceptive business practices pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. 1 We affirm.…”
Com. v. Kolovich, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “Appellant’s third issue is a challenge to the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash the Commonwealth’s petition seeking leave to amend the information to add new charges under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107, a statute which he maintained was constitutionally infirm.”
Com. v. Rabelow, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016).
Com. v. Murphy, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(1)(6) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Robb, 48 Pa. D. & C.3d 443 (1988).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(11)(i) — 1 case
Bahnatka, M. v. Victory Brewing Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(2) — 17 cases
Commonwealth v. Succi, 173 A.3d 269 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “3922 (Theft by Deception) or 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107 (Deceptive or Fraudulent Business Practices).”
Commonwealth v. Kolovich, 170 A.3d 520 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “Robert Kolovich appeals from his judgment of sentence of twenty-seven to seventy-two months imprisonment, which was imposed following his conviction of six counts of theft by deception, and twelve counts of deceptive business practices pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. 1 We affirm.…”
Com. v. Rohwer, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Com. v. Thompson, L. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
Com. v. Santia, D., 301 A.3d 924 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(4) — 1 case
A.E.V., Inc. v. Commonwealth Liquor Control Bd., 641 A.2d 30 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1994).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(5) — 1 case
Bell Atl.-Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n, 763 A.2d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2000). “24, 1976, P.L. 1166, as amended, 73 P.S. § 201-2(4)(vii), (viii), (ix).”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(6) — 4 cases
Commonwealth v. Snyder, 483 A.2d 933 (Pa. 1984). “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107(a)(6). There was sufficient evidence of Clampers’s intent to commit theft by deception and deceptive business practices even though much of the work done for the Eckerts was legitimate and therefore some portion of the payment obtained from them was not…”
Com. v. Kolovich, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Fulton Bank, N.A. v. Sandquist, P. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Com. v. Kolovich, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(8) — 1 case
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(a)(8)(iv) — 1 case
Com. v. Francis, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 4107(b) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Kolovich, 170 A.3d 520 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017). “Robert Kolovich appeals from his judgment of sentence of twenty-seven to seventy-two months imprisonment, which was imposed following his conviction of six counts of theft by deception, and twelve counts of deceptive business practices pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107. 1 We affirm.…”
Com. v. Kolovich, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “Appellant’s third issue is a challenge to the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash the Commonwealth’s petition seeking leave to amend the information to add new charges under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4107, a statute which he maintained was constitutionally infirm.”
Com. v. Pratt, D. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.