18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508

 Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 7508.  Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties.

(a)  General rule.--Notwithstanding any other provisions of this or any other act to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply:

(1)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of the act of April 14, 1972 (P.L.233, No.64), known as The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, where the controlled substance is marijuana shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:

(i)  when the amount of marijuana involved is at least two pounds, but less than ten pounds, or at least ten live plants but less than 21 live plants; one year in prison and a fine of $5,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: two years in prison and a fine of $10,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity;

(ii)  when the amount of marijuana involved is at least ten pounds, but less than 50 pounds, or at least 21 live plants but less than 51 live plants; three years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: four years in prison and a fine of $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(iii)  when the amount of marijuana involved is at least 50 pounds, or at least 51 live plants; five years in prison and a fine of $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(2)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance or a mixture containing it is classified in Schedule I or Schedule II under section 4 of that act and is a narcotic drug shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:

(i)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 2.0 grams and less than ten grams; two years in prison and a fine of $5,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: three years in prison and $10,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity;

(ii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least ten grams and less than 100 grams; three years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(iii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 100 grams; five years in prison and a fine of $25,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: seven years in prison and $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(3)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is coca leaves or is any salt, compound, derivative or preparation of coca leaves or is any salt, compound, derivative or preparation which is chemically equivalent or identical with any of these substances or is any mixture containing any of these substances except decocainized coca leaves or extracts of coca leaves which (extracts) do not contain cocaine or ecgonine shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:

(i)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 2.0 grams and less than ten grams; one year in prison and a fine of $5,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: three years in prison and $10,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity;

(ii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least ten grams and less than 100 grams; three years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(iii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture of the substance involved is at least 100 grams; four years in prison and a fine of $25,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: seven years in prison and $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(4)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is methamphetamine or phencyclidine or is a salt, isomer or salt of an isomer of methamphetamine or phencyclidine or is a mixture containing methamphetamine or phencyclidine, containing a salt of methamphetamine or phencyclidine, containing an isomer of methamphetamine or phencyclidine, containing a salt of an isomer of methamphetamine or phencyclidine shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:

(i)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least five grams and less than ten grams; three years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity;

(ii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least ten grams and less than 100 grams; four years in prison and a fine of $25,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: seven years in prison and $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(iii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 100 grams; five years in prison and a fine of $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: eight years in prison and $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(5)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, and who, in the course of the offense, manufactures, delivers, brings into this Commonwealth or possesses with intent to manufacture or deliver amphetamine or any salt, optical isomer, or salt of an optical isomer, or a mixture containing any such substances shall, when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least five grams, be sentenced to two and one-half years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: be sentenced to five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(6)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is methaqualone shall, upon conviction, be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment and a fine as set forth in this subsection:

(i)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 50 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or 25 grams and less than 200 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or 100 grams; one year in prison and a fine of $2,500 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: three years in prison and $5,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(ii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 200 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or more than 100 grams; two and one-half years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(7)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance or a mixture containing it is heroin shall, upon conviction, be sentenced as set forth in this paragraph:

(i)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the heroin involved is at least 1.0 gram but less than 5.0 grams the sentence shall be a mandatory minimum term of two years in prison and a fine of $5,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: a mandatory minimum term of three years in prison and $10,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity;

(ii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the heroin involved is at least 5.0 grams but less than 50 grams: a mandatory minimum term of three years in prison and a fine of $15,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: a mandatory minimum term of five years in prison and $30,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; and

(iii)  when the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the heroin involved is 50 grams or greater: a mandatory minimum term of five years in prison and a fine of $25,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity; however, if at the time of sentencing the defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense: a mandatory minimum term of seven years in prison and $50,000 or such larger amount as is sufficient to exhaust the assets utilized in and the proceeds from the illegal activity.

(8)  A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(12), (14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance or a mixture containing it is 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA); 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA); 5-methoxy-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MMDA); 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine; N-hydroxy-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine; or their salts, isomers and salts of isomers, whenever the existence of such salts, isomers and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation, shall, upon conviction, be sentenced as set forth in this paragraph:

(i)  When the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 50 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or 15 grams and less than 100 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or less than 30 grams, the person is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding five years or to pay a fine not exceeding $15,000, or both.

(ii)  When the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 100 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or 30 grams and less than 1,000 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or less than 300 grams, the person is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding ten years or to pay a fine not exceeding $100,000, or both.

(iii)  When the aggregate weight of the compound or mixture containing the substance involved is at least 1,000 tablets, capsules, caplets or other dosage units, or 300 grams, the person is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment not exceeding 15 years or to pay a fine not exceeding $250,000, or both.

(a.1)  Previous conviction.--For purposes of this section, it shall be deemed that a defendant has been convicted of another drug trafficking offense when the defendant has been convicted of another offense under section 13(a)(14), (30) or (37) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, or of a similar offense under any statute of any state or the United States, whether or not judgment of sentence has been imposed concerning that offense.

(b)  Proof of sentencing.--Provisions of this section shall not be an element of the crime. Notice of the applicability of this section to the defendant shall not be required prior to conviction, but reasonable notice of the Commonwealth's intention to proceed under this section shall be provided after conviction and before sentencing. The applicability of this section shall be determined at sentencing. The court shall consider evidence presented at trial, shall afford the Commonwealth and the defendant an opportunity to present necessary additional evidence and shall determine, by a preponderance of the evidence, if this section is applicable.

(c)  Mandatory sentencing.--There shall be no authority in any court to impose on an offender to which this section is applicable a lesser sentence than provided for herein or to place the offender on probation, parole or work release or to suspend sentence. Nothing in this section shall prevent the sentencing court from imposing a sentence greater than provided herein. Sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing shall not supersede the mandatory sentences provided herein. Disposition under section 17 or 18 of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act shall not be available to a defendant to which this section applies.

(d)  Appellate review.--If a sentencing court refuses to apply this section where applicable, the Commonwealth shall have the right to appellate review of the action of the sentencing court. The appellate court shall vacate the sentence and remand the case to the sentencing court for imposition of a sentence in accordance with this section if it finds that the sentence was imposed in violation of this section.

(e)  Forfeiture.--Assets against which a petition seeking forfeiture has been filed and is pending or against which the Commonwealth has indicated an intention to file a petition seeking forfeiture shall not be subject to a fine. Nothing in this section shall prevent a fine from being imposed on assets which have been subject to an unsuccessful forfeiture petition.

(f)  Growing plants.--When the controlled substance is marijuana in the form of growing plants and the number of plants is nine or less, weighing may be accomplished by law enforcement officials utilizing any certified scale convenient to the place of arrest for the purpose of determining the weight of the growing marijuana plant. The aggregate weight of the plant is to include the whole plant including the root system if possible. The weight is not to include any substance not a part of the growing plant.

(Mar. 25, 1988, P.L.262, No.31, eff. July 1, 1988; Dec. 19, 1990, P.L.1451, No.219, eff. imd.; June 22, 2000, P.L.345, No.41, eff. 60 days; Dec. 9, 2002, P.L.1439, No.183, eff. 60 days; June 10, 2003, P.L.10, No.4, eff. imd.; July 5, 2012, P.L.1050, No.122, eff. July 1, 2013; June 29, 2017, P.L.247, No.13, eff. July 1, 2017)

 

2018 Unconstitutionality.  Section 7508 was declared unconstitutional on January 18, 2018, by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v DiMatteo, 177 A.3d 182 (2018).

2017 Amendment.  Act 13 amended subsec. (e).

2015 Unconstitutionality.  Section 7508 was declared unconstitutional on April 20, 2015, by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. Mosley, 114 A.3d 1072 (2015).

2014 Unconstitutionality.  Section 7508 was declared unconstitutional on November 25, 2014, by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. Cardwell, 105 A.3d 748 (2014).

2012 Amendment.  Act 122 amended subsec. (c).

2003 Amendment.  Act 4 amended subsec. (a)(8).

2000 Amendment.  Act 41 added subsec. (a)(7).

Cross References.  Section 7508 is referred to in sections 704, 706 of Title 3 (Agriculture); sections 9711, 9712.1 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure); section 4103 of Title 61 (Prisons and Parole).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 313 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Sunealitis
Commonwealth v. Sunealitis (2016) pasuperct · cites it 12× “In our prior decision, we sua sponte vacated judgment of sentence, finding that Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence, imposed pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508, was illegal. Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Kleinicke (2006) pasuperct · cites it 14× “Kleinicke appeals from the judgment of sentence of five years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine that was imposed after he was convicted of possession with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of 35 P.”
Commonwealth v. Vargas (2014) pasuperct · cites it 8× “Furthermore, even if the evidence were sufficient to support Appellant’s convictions for those crimes, I join the Majority in its determination that the mandatory minimum sentence imposed for his PWID conviction is illegal because 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Foster (2008) pasuperct · cites it 10× “2d 1280, 1284 (2000), the Court addressed this issue in the context of a trial court's belated addition of mandatory minimum fines contained in 18 Pa. C.S. § 7508, the sentencing provision applicable to drug trafficking.”
Commonwealth v. Johnson (2011) pa · cites it 8× “Because this total was more than one gram, the trial court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. Perez, supra at 706 & n.”
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa · cites it 22× “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
Commonwealth v. Vasquez (2000) pa · cites it 12× “At issue in this case is the interpretation by a trial court of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. The trial court concluded, and the Superior Court agreed, that where the Commonwealth properly invokes the mandatory sentencing provisions found in…”
Commonwealth v. Corporan (1992) pa · cites it 16× “When appellant was sentenced, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a) provided in pertinent part as follows: [*] (3) A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is coca leaves or is any…”
Jean Junior Jeune v. Attorney General of the United States (2007) ca3 · cites it 7× “” The Government contends that we may conclude based solely on this information that Jeune committed an aggravated felony. The Government asks us to rest our decision on this slender reed.”
Commonwealth v. Goggins (2000) pasuperct · cites it 6× “] 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3)(i). Thus, because Goggins's conviction was his first as an adult, the mandatory term of incarceration to which he was subject was one year.”
Commonwealth v. Thompson (2014) pasuperct · cites it 4× “Moreover, permitting Appellant to raise these matters without providing the jury with the greater context in which an officer’s potential motives to lie may arise would render the admitted testimony unduly prejudicial to the Commonwealth. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial…”
Commonwealth v. Boyd (2007) pasuperct · cites it 21× “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties).”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(2)(i) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Johnson (2007) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Vasquez (2000) pa “At issue in this case is the interpretation by a trial court of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. The trial court concluded, and the Superior Court agreed, that where the Commonwealth properly invokes the mandatory sentencing provisions found in…”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(3)(i) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Hansley (2010) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(3)(ii)(a) — 1 case
Com. v. Carr, V. (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a) — 18 cases
Commonwealth v. Baney (2004) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Baker (2013) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Hopkins (2013) pasuperct
Com. v. Ruiz, J., Jr. (2015) pasuperct
Jean Junior Jeune v. Attorney General of the United States (2007) ca3 “” The Government contends that we may conclude based solely on this information that Jeune committed an aggravated felony. The Government asks us to rest our decision on this slender reed.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(1) — 4 cases
Jean Junior Jeune v. Attorney General of the United States (2007) ca3 “” The Government contends that we may conclude based solely on this information that Jeune committed an aggravated felony. The Government asks us to rest our decision on this slender reed.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(1)(h) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Ciccone (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(1)(i) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Tobin (2014) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
Com. v. Freeman, M. A. (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(1)(ii) — 7 cases
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
Commonwealth v. Myers (1996) pasuperct
Com. v. Ciccone, S. (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(1)(iii) — 11 cases
Commonwealth v. Sebolka (2019) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Kleinicke (2006) pasuperct “Kleinicke appeals from the judgment of sentence of five years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine that was imposed after he was convicted of possession with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of 35 P.”
Commonwealth v. Vargas (2014) pasuperct “Furthermore, even if the evidence were sufficient to support Appellant’s convictions for those crimes, I join the Majority in its determination that the mandatory minimum sentence imposed for his PWID conviction is illegal because 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Morales (1990) pasuperct
Com. v. Foss, C. (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2) — 6 cases
Commonwealth v. Harley (2007) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Carroll (1994) pasuperct
Com. v. Rivera-Montanez, F. (2015) pasuperct
Com. v. Smith, S. (2018) pasuperct
Com. v. Slaughter, G. (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2)(f) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Gould (2006) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2)(h) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Thompson (2014) pasuperct “Moreover, permitting Appellant to raise these matters without providing the jury with the greater context in which an officer’s potential motives to lie may arise would render the admitted testimony unduly prejudicial to the Commonwealth. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial…”
Commonwealth v. Harley (2007) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2)(i) — 9 cases
Commonwealth v. Vasquez (2000) pa “At issue in this case is the interpretation by a trial court of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. The trial court concluded, and the Superior Court agreed, that where the Commonwealth properly invokes the mandatory sentencing provisions found in…”
Commonwealth v. Gould (2006) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Carroll (1994) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2)(ii) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Thompson (2014) pasuperct “Moreover, permitting Appellant to raise these matters without providing the jury with the greater context in which an officer’s potential motives to lie may arise would render the admitted testimony unduly prejudicial to the Commonwealth. Accordingly, we conclude that the trial…”
Commonwealth v. Manuel (2004) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Harley (2007) pasuperct
Com. v. McMillan, M. (2015) pasuperct
Com. v. White, B. (2021) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(2)(iii) — 1 case
Com. v. Carr, V. (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3) — 21 cases
Commonwealth v. Corporan (1992) pa “When appellant was sentenced, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a) provided in pertinent part as follows: [*] (3) A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is coca leaves or is any…”
Commonwealth v. Mickens (1991) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(f) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Hansley (2010) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Kane (1993) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(h) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Corporan (1992) pa “When appellant was sentenced, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a) provided in pertinent part as follows: [*] (3) A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is coca leaves or is any…”
Commonwealth v. Boyd (2007) pasuperct “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties).”
Commonwealth v. Bell (2006) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Jones (1994) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Brown (1991) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(i) — 33 cases
Commonwealth v. Goggins (2000) pasuperct “] 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a)(3)(i). Thus, because Goggins's conviction was his first as an adult, the mandatory term of incarceration to which he was subject was one year.”
Commonwealth v. Boyd (2007) pasuperct “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties).”
Commonwealth v. Mayes (1994) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(ii) — 26 cases
Commonwealth v. Corporan (1992) pa “When appellant was sentenced, 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508(a) provided in pertinent part as follows: [*] (3) A person who is convicted of violating section 13(a)(14) or (30) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act where the controlled substance is coca leaves or is any…”
Commonwealth v. Jones (1994) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Boyd (2007) pasuperct “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties).”
Commonwealth v. Harper (1992) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(iii) — 20 cases
Com. v. Ruiz, J., Jr. (2015) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Young (2007) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Main (2010) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Hockenberry (1997) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(3)(l) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Lawson (1995) pactcomplcumber
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(4) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Mickens (1991) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(4)(i) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Sunealitis (2016) pasuperct “In our prior decision, we sua sponte vacated judgment of sentence, finding that Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence, imposed pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508, was illegal. Commonwealth v.”
Com. v. Williams, M. (2014) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(4)(iii) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Sunealitis (2016) pasuperct “In our prior decision, we sua sponte vacated judgment of sentence, finding that Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence, imposed pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508, was illegal. Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Mickens (1991) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Camperson (1994) pasuperct
Com. v. Handzus, J. (2015) pasuperct
Com. v. Chamberlain, S. (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(7) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Delvalle (2013) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Johnson (2011) pa “Because this total was more than one gram, the trial court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. Perez, supra at 706 & n.”
Com. v. Kelso, D. (2015) pasuperct
Com. v. Seretti, J. (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(7)(i) — 6 cases
Commonwealth v. Johnson (2011) pa “Because this total was more than one gram, the trial court imposed a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. Perez, supra at 706 & n.”
Commonwealth v. Baker (2013) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Johnson (2007) pasuperct
Com. v. Davey, A. (2025) pasuperct
Com. v. Phillips, C. (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(7)(i)(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Rivera (2017) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(7)(ii) — 5 cases
Com. v. Lavin, N. (2016) pasuperct
Com. v. Seaton, D. (2016) pasuperct
Com. v. Evans, R. (2016) pasuperct
Com. v. Santiago, C. (2015) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Dalton (2004) pactcomplberks
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(7)(iii) — 1 case
Com. v. Bavin, J. (2017) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(8) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Glenn (1996) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(8)(h) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Boyd (2007) pasuperct “See 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508 (Drug trafficking sentencing and penalties).”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(a)(i) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Bell (1991) pactcomplallegh
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(i)(iii) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Bell (1991) pactcomplallegh
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(ii) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Bell (1991) pactcomplallegh
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(iii) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Kleinicke (2006) pasuperct “Kleinicke appeals from the judgment of sentence of five years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine that was imposed after he was convicted of possession with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of 35 P.”
Commonwealth v. Patterson (2016) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(l)(i) — 2 cases
Jean Junior Jeune v. Attorney General of the United States (2007) ca3 “” The Government contends that we may conclude based solely on this information that Jeune committed an aggravated felony. The Government asks us to rest our decision on this slender reed.”
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(l)(ii) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(a)(l)(iii) — 14 cases
Commonwealth v. Kleinicke (2006) pasuperct “Kleinicke appeals from the judgment of sentence of five years imprisonment and a $50,000 fine that was imposed after he was convicted of possession with intent to manufacture a controlled substance, marijuana, in violation of 35 P.”
Commonwealth v. Tobin (2014) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Postie (2015) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(b) — 32 cases
Commonwealth v. Vargas (2014) pasuperct “Furthermore, even if the evidence were sufficient to support Appellant’s convictions for those crimes, I join the Majority in its determination that the mandatory minimum sentence imposed for his PWID conviction is illegal because 18 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Myers (1998) pa “Because I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for appellate review of factual determinations of the sentencing court made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. §7508, I must respectfully dissent.”
Commonwealth v. Newman (2014) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Watley (2013) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(c) — 9 cases
Commonwealth v. Sunealitis (2016) pasuperct “In our prior decision, we sua sponte vacated judgment of sentence, finding that Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence, imposed pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508, was illegal. Commonwealth v.”
Commonwealth v. Boatwright (1991) pasuperct
Jean Junior Jeune v. Attorney General of the United States (2007) ca3 “” The Government contends that we may conclude based solely on this information that Jeune committed an aggravated felony. The Government asks us to rest our decision on this slender reed.”
Commonwealth v. Vasquez (2000) pa “At issue in this case is the interpretation by a trial court of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions of 18 Pa.C.S. § 7508. The trial court concluded, and the Superior Court agreed, that where the Commonwealth properly invokes the mandatory sentencing provisions found in…”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(d) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Foster (2008) pasuperct “2d 1280, 1284 (2000), the Court addressed this issue in the context of a trial court's belated addition of mandatory minimum fines contained in 18 Pa. C.S. § 7508, the sentencing provision applicable to drug trafficking.”
Commonwealth v. Myers (1996) pasuperct
Commonwealth v. Mayes (1994) pasuperct
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7508(l)(a)(iii) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Bell (1991) pactcomplallegh
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.