§ 9112. Mandatory fingerprinting.
(a) General rule.--Fingerprints of all persons arrested for a felony, misdemeanor or summary offense
which becomes a misdemeanor on a second arrest after conviction of that summary offense,
shall be taken by the arresting authority, and within 48 hours of the arrest, shall
be forwarded to, and in a manner and such a form as provided by, the central repository.
(b) Other cases.--
(1) Where private complaints for a felony or misdemeanor result in a conviction, the court
of proper jurisdiction shall order the defendant to submit for fingerprinting by the
municipal police of the jurisdiction in which the offense was allegedly committed
or in the absence of a police department, the State Police. Fingerprints so obtained
shall, within 48 hours, be forwarded to the central repository in a manner and in
such form as may be provided by the central repository.
(2) Where defendants named in police complaints are proceeded against by summons, or for
offenses under section 3929 (relating to retail theft), the court of proper jurisdiction
shall order the defendant to submit within five days of such order for fingerprinting
by the municipal police of the jurisdiction in which the offense allegedly was committed
or, in the absence of a police department, the State Police. Fingerprints so obtained
shall, within 48 hours, be forwarded to the central repository in a manner and in
such form as may be provided by the central repository.
(c) Transmittal of information.--The central repository shall transmit the criminal history record information to the
criminal justice agency which submitted a complete, accurate and classifiable fingerprint
card.
(Dec. 14, 1979, P.L.556, No.127, eff. imd.; June 11, 1982, P.L.476, No.138, eff.
180 days)
Cross References. Section 9112 is referred to in section 6309 of Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure).
Notes of Decisions
Commonwealth v. Presher, 179 A.3d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
· cites it 10× “: *91 Appellant, Michael Allen Presher, appeals from the trial court's December 19, 2016 order directing authorities to fingerprint Appellant pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112, after a jury acquitted him of the criminal conduct that triggered the statute's fingerprinting mandate.”
Dial v. Vaughn, 733 A.2d 1 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).
· cites it 2× “The Act defines an administrative requirement that must be satisfied prior to release.”
Dep't of the Auditor Gen. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 844 A.2d 78 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Section 9112(a) of the CHRIA, 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112(a). [8] Thus, once there has been an arrest and the criminal proceedings have begun, information about a case becomes "criminal history record information" to the extent that it falls within the statutory definition.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9112(a) — 2 cases
Dep't of the Auditor Gen. v. Pennsylvania State Police, 844 A.2d 78 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).
“Section 9112(a) of the CHRIA, 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112(a). [8] Thus, once there has been an arrest and the criminal proceedings have begun, information about a case becomes "criminal history record information" to the extent that it falls within the statutory definition.”
Commonwealth v. Presher, 179 A.3d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“: *91 Appellant, Michael Allen Presher, appeals from the trial court's December 19, 2016 order directing authorities to fingerprint Appellant pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112, after a jury acquitted him of the criminal conduct that triggered the statute's fingerprinting mandate.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9112(b)(1) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Presher, 179 A.3d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“: *91 Appellant, Michael Allen Presher, appeals from the trial court's December 19, 2016 order directing authorities to fingerprint Appellant pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112, after a jury acquitted him of the criminal conduct that triggered the statute's fingerprinting mandate.”
— 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9112(b)(2) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Presher, 179 A.3d 90 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
“: *91 Appellant, Michael Allen Presher, appeals from the trial court's December 19, 2016 order directing authorities to fingerprint Appellant pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. § 9112, after a jury acquitted him of the criminal conduct that triggered the statute's fingerprinting mandate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.