Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155 (2026)

 Persons entitled.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 3155.  Persons entitled.

(a)  Letters testamentary.--Letters testamentary shall be granted by the register to the executor designated in the will, whether or not he has declined a trust under the will.

(b)  Letters of administration.--Letters of administration shall be granted by the register, in such form as the case shall require, to one or more of those hereinafter mentioned and, except for good cause, in the following order:

(1)  Those entitled to the residuary estate under the will.

(2)  The surviving spouse.

(3)  Those entitled under the intestate law as the register, in his discretion, shall judge will best administer the estate, giving preference, however, according to the sizes of the shares of those in this class.

(4)  The principal creditors of the decedent at the time of his death.

(5)  Other fit persons.

(6)  If anyone of the foregoing shall renounce his right to letters of administration, the register, in his discretion, may appoint a nominee of the person so renouncing in preference to the persons set forth in any succeeding paragraph.

(7)  A guardianship support agency serving as guardian of an incapacitated person who dies during the guardianship administered pursuant to Subchapter F of Chapter 55 (relating to guardianship support).

(8)  A redevelopment authority formed pursuant to the act of May 24, 1945 (P.L.991, No.385), known as the Urban Redevelopment Law.

(c)  Time limitation.--Except with the consent of those enumerated in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3), no letters shall be issued to those enumerated in paragraph (4), (5) or (8) of subsection (b) until 30 days after the decedent's death.

(d)  Death charges.--Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b), the register shall not grant letters testamentary or letters of administration to any person charged, whether by indictment, information or otherwise, by the United States, the Commonwealth or any of the several states, with voluntary manslaughter or homicide, except homicide by vehicle, in connection with a decedent's death unless and until the charge is withdrawn, dismissed or a verdict of not guilty is returned.

(Apr. 16, 1992, P.L.108, No.24, eff. 60 days; Dec. 20, 2000, P.L.838, No.118, eff. 60 days; Nov. 29, 2006, P.L.1536, No.171, eff. 60 days)

 

Cross References.  Section 3155 is referred to in sections 3181, 3182 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: In Re: Est. of D.A.A., Appeal of: Anderson, R., 317 A.3d 997 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
In Re: Est. of D.A.A., Appeal of: Anderson, R., 317 A.3d 997 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b)(1)-(6). “The register of wills may exercise discretion in appointing an administrator from within the class of persons eligible for appointment [set forth in Section 3155(b)] to oversee the estate of one who has died intestate.”
In Re Est. of Dilbon, 690 A.2d 1216 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). · cites it 5× “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155. Persons entitled (b) Letters of administration.”
Three Keys Ltd. v. SR Util. Holding Co., 540 F.3d 220 (3rd Cir. 2008). “See 20 Pa. Cons.Stat. § 3155; Black's Law Dictionary 925 (8th ed.”
In re Est. of Andrews, 92 A.3d 1226 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155. Since Ms. Andrews died testate, letters testamentary must issue.”
In re Est. of Klink, 743 A.2d 482 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “” 20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b). Thus neither has any automatic priority or preference over the other as the proper person to administer the estate.”
In Re the Est. of Dodge, 522 A.2d 77 (Pa. 1987). “Yoder’s evidence was insufficient to prove a common law marriage, and that the letters of administration should be revoked.”
In re Est. of Blom, 642 A.2d 498 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). “— Letters of administration shall be granted by the register, in such form as the case shall require, to one or more of those hereinafter mentioned and, except for good cause, in the following order: [[Image here]] (3) Those entitled under the intestate law as the register, in…”
Yakowicz v. Costigan, 331 A.2d 238 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1975). “) The Secretary then concludes that by virtue of the wording of section 3155(b) of the Code, 20 Pa. C.S. §3155 (b), the Register must make the named agent or nominee of the Secretary the administrator of the estate.”
Dorsey v. Redman, 22 A.3d 274 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b). (Trial Ct. Op. at 2, ¶ 2.”
Est. of Campbell, L., Appeal of: Uhuru, N. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020). · cites it 5× “Our legislature also enacted a list of disqualified persons, such as minors, persons accused of murdering the decedent, and persons “found by the register to be unfit to be entrusted with the administration of the estate.”
Dohner v. Clemens, 703 A.2d 708 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, we point out that despite the apparent refusal of decedent’s children to seek the letters of administration, procedures exist in 20 Pa.C.S. § 3155 by which decedent’s counsel could have sought grant of the letters in order to preserve the action.”
In Re: Est. of John J. Lynn (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 4× “It committed an error of law and an abuse of discretion in failing to do so.”
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(a) — 3 cases
Katz v. Grasso (E.D. Pa. 2024).
Katz v. Iron Hill Co. (E.D. Pa. 2024).
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b) — 12 cases
In Re Est. of Dilbon, 690 A.2d 1216 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155. Persons entitled (b) Letters of administration.”
In re Est. of Klink, 743 A.2d 482 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999). “” 20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b). Thus neither has any automatic priority or preference over the other as the proper person to administer the estate.”
In Re the Est. of Dodge, 522 A.2d 77 (Pa. 1987). “Yoder’s evidence was insufficient to prove a common law marriage, and that the letters of administration should be revoked.”
In re Est. of Blom, 642 A.2d 498 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1994). “— Letters of administration shall be granted by the register, in such form as the case shall require, to one or more of those hereinafter mentioned and, except for good cause, in the following order: [[Image here]] (3) Those entitled under the intestate law as the register, in…”
Dorsey v. Redman, 22 A.3d 274 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b). (Trial Ct. Op. at 2, ¶ 2.”
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b)(1) — 3 cases
In Re: Est. of D.A.A., Appeal of: Anderson, R., 317 A.3d 997 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155(b)(1)-(6). “The register of wills may exercise discretion in appointing an administrator from within the class of persons eligible for appointment [set forth in Section 3155(b)] to oversee the estate of one who has died intestate.”
In Re Est. of Dilbon, 690 A.2d 1216 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155. Persons entitled (b) Letters of administration.”
In Re: Est. of John J. Lynn (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “It committed an error of law and an abuse of discretion in failing to do so.”
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b)(2) — 1 case
In the Est. of: Stevenson, T., III (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b)(3) — 2 cases
Est. of Campbell, L., Appeal of: Uhuru, N. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020). “Our legislature also enacted a list of disqualified persons, such as minors, persons accused of murdering the decedent, and persons “found by the register to be unfit to be entrusted with the administration of the estate.”
In re Est. of Brooks, 31 Pa. D. & C.5th 237 (2013).
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b)(5) — 1 case
In Re Est. of Dilbon, 690 A.2d 1216 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997). “20 Pa.C.S. § 3155. Persons entitled (b) Letters of administration.”
— 20 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 3155(b)(6) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.