Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512 (2026)

 Petition for involuntary termination.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 2512.  Petition for involuntary termination.

(a)  Who may file.--A petition to terminate parental rights with respect to a child under the age of 18 years may be filed by any of the following:

(1)  Either parent when termination is sought with respect to the other parent.

(2)  An agency.

(3)  The individual having custody or standing in loco parentis to the child and who has filed a report of intention to adopt required by section 2531 (relating to report of intention to adopt).

(4)  An attorney representing a child or a guardian ad litem representing a child who has been adjudicated dependent under 42 Pa.C.S. § 6341(c) (relating to adjudication).

(b)  Contents.--The following apply:

(1)  The petition shall set forth specifically those grounds and facts alleged as the basis for terminating parental rights.

(2)  Except as provided in paragraph (3), the petition filed under this section shall also contain an averment that the petitioner will assume custody of the child until such time as the child is adopted.

(3)  If the petitioner is a parent and section 2514 (relating to special provisions when child conceived as a result of rape or incest) applies, or if the petitioner is an agency, the petitioner shall not be required to aver that an adoption is presently contemplated nor that a person with a present intention to adopt exists.

(c)  Father not identified.--If the petition does not identify the father of the child, it shall state whether a claim of paternity has been filed under section 8303 (relating to claim of paternity).

(Dec. 20, 1995, P.L.685, No.76, eff. 60 days; Oct. 29, 2020, P.L.780, No.95, eff. 60 days)

 

2020 Amendment.  Act 95 amended subsec. (b). Section 3 of Act 95 provided that the amendment or addition of subsec. (b) and section 2514 apply to petitions to involuntarily terminate parental rights filed on or after the effective date of section 3.

1995 Amendment.  Act 76 added subsec. (a)(4).

References in Text.  Former section 8303, referred to in this section, is repealed. The subject matter is now contained in section 5103.

Cross References.  Section 2512 is referred to in sections 2513, 2521 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 90 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251 (Pa. 2013).
In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251 (Pa. 2013). · cites it 5× “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a)(3). Likewise, this Gourt has noted that a petition to terminate parental rights filed by a biological parent “is only cognizable when it is accompanied by a prospective stepparent’s intention to adopt the child,” noting that the public policy behind this…”
In Re Adoption of L.J.B., 18 A.3d 1098 (Pa. 2011). · cites it 14× “§ 2512(b) (providing that, only if a children and youth agency is moving for termination may such termination proceed without a concomitant intent to adopt the child by a prospective stepparent).”
In Re: Adopt. of M.R.D. & T.M.D. Appeal of: M.C., 145 A.3d 1117 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 6× “With regard to the Act’s requirement that the termination petition be filed in contemplation of an adoption, see 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(b), Mother and Grandfather also averred that they anticipated that Grandfather would adopt Children and co-parent with Mother.”
In re T.S., 192 A.3d 1080 (Pa. 2018). “at 1090 ("there can be no conflict between an attorney's duty to advance a subjective preference on the child's part which is incapable of ascertainment, and an attorney's concurrent obligation to advocate for the child's best interests as she understands them to be"); see also…”
In Re: A.J.R.-H. & I.G.R.-H. Apl of KJR Mother, 188 A.3d 1157 (Pa. 2018). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). Consistent with my position in Hicks, supra at 1181 n.”
In Re Adoption of S.E.G., 901 A.2d 1017 (Pa. 2006). · cites it 2× “" 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). As with subsection (f), Mother cannot point to any provision in subsection (f.”
In Re: Adoption of: A.C., a minor, Appeal of: A.C., 162 A.3d 1123 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “In March 2016, counsel for Father sought to dismiss the Petition to Terminate Parental Rights, because it failed to comply with the Pennsylvania Adoption Act, 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(b), which states that the petition shall set forth specifically those grounds and facts alleged as the…”
In Re Adoption of B.R.S., 11 A.3d 541 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011). · cites it 5× “Father countered on May 24, 2010, with a motion to quash Foster Parents’ petition because they lacked standing pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512 to file a petition to involuntarily terminate his and Mother’s parental rights.”
In re Adoption of W.C.K., 748 A.2d 223 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). · cites it 3× “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). Mother argues that it is absurd to contend that the DeCostros have standing to terminate her parental rights to W.”
In Re: C.M.C., a minor, Appeal of C.L.C., 140 A.3d 699 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512. Section 2513 provides for the hearing on the involuntary termination petition.”
In re G.P.-R., 851 A.2d 967 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 3× “ld have been dismissed because it was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution for the Agency and the Guardian Ad Litem to file a petition for termination of parental rights before Father had had adequate time to attempt reunification with his…”
In Re Adoption of J.F., 572 A.2d 223 (Pa. 1990). · cites it 2× “had no right, under 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512, to petition for the involun *44 tary termination of appellant’s parental rights.”
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(3) — 1 case
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(a) — 16 cases
In re T.S., 192 A.3d 1080 (Pa. 2018). “at 1090 ("there can be no conflict between an attorney's duty to advance a subjective preference on the child's part which is incapable of ascertainment, and an attorney's concurrent obligation to advocate for the child's best interests as she understands them to be"); see also…”
In Re: A.J.R.-H. & I.G.R.-H. Apl of KJR Mother, 188 A.3d 1157 (Pa. 2018). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). Consistent with my position in Hicks, supra at 1181 n.”
In Re Adoption of S.E.G., 901 A.2d 1017 (Pa. 2006). “" 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). As with subsection (f), Mother cannot point to any provision in subsection (f.”
In re the Adoption of A.J.B., 797 A.2d 264 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2002).
In re Adoption of W.C.K., 748 A.2d 223 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). Mother argues that it is absurd to contend that the DeCostros have standing to terminate her parental rights to W.”
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(a)(1) — 8 cases
In Re Adoption of Hamilton, 523 A.2d 1176 (Pa. 1987).
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(a)(3) — 21 cases
In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251 (Pa. 2013). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a)(3). Likewise, this Gourt has noted that a petition to terminate parental rights filed by a biological parent “is only cognizable when it is accompanied by a prospective stepparent’s intention to adopt the child,” noting that the public policy behind this…”
In re Adoption of W.C.K., 748 A.2d 223 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a). Mother argues that it is absurd to contend that the DeCostros have standing to terminate her parental rights to W.”
In Re Adoption of B.R.S., 11 A.3d 541 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011). “Father countered on May 24, 2010, with a motion to quash Foster Parents’ petition because they lacked standing pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512 to file a petition to involuntarily terminate his and Mother’s parental rights.”
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(b) — 45 cases
In re T.S.M., 71 A.3d 251 (Pa. 2013). “23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(a)(3). Likewise, this Gourt has noted that a petition to terminate parental rights filed by a biological parent “is only cognizable when it is accompanied by a prospective stepparent’s intention to adopt the child,” noting that the public policy behind this…”
In Re: Adopt. of M.R.D. & T.M.D. Appeal of: M.C., 145 A.3d 1117 (Pa. 2016). “With regard to the Act’s requirement that the termination petition be filed in contemplation of an adoption, see 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(b), Mother and Grandfather also averred that they anticipated that Grandfather would adopt Children and co-parent with Mother.”
In Re Adoption of L.J.B., 18 A.3d 1098 (Pa. 2011). “§ 2512(b) (providing that, only if a children and youth agency is moving for termination may such termination proceed without a concomitant intent to adopt the child by a prospective stepparent).”
In Re: Adoption of: A.C., a minor, Appeal of: A.C., 162 A.3d 1123 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “In March 2016, counsel for Father sought to dismiss the Petition to Terminate Parental Rights, because it failed to comply with the Pennsylvania Adoption Act, 23 Pa.C.S. § 2512(b), which states that the petition shall set forth specifically those grounds and facts alleged as the…”
In Re: Adopt. of M.R.D. & T.M.D. Appeal of: M.C., 128 A.3d 1249 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(b)(1) — 1 case
In the Int. of: A.S., Appeal of: L.P. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(b)(2) — 3 cases
In Re: J.M.M., Appeal of: C.L.B. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
In Re: M.L.R., Appeal of: M.V.D (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
— 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2512(b)(3) — 3 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.