CHAPTER 68
FORFEITURES
Sec.
6801. Controlled substances forfeiture (Repealed).
6801.1. Terrorism forfeiture (Repealed).
6802. Procedure with respect to seized property subject to liens and rights of lienholders
(Repealed).
Enactment. Chapter 68 was added June 30, 1988, P.L.464, No.79, effective immediately.
Chapter Heading. The heading of Chapter 68 was amended July 7, 2006, P.L.342, No.71, effective in 60
days.
Cross References. Chapter 68 is referred to in section 9912 of this title; section 1504 of Title 62
(Procurement).
§ 6801. Controlled substances forfeiture (Repealed).
2017 Repeal. Section 6801 was repealed June 29, 2017, P.L.247, No.13, effective July 1, 2017.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
153
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case:
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
· cites it 7× “The legislature, to augment the protections against unlawful taking of personal property by the government enshrined in our state and federal constitutions, has crafted a substantive legal framework in the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 6801 (“Forfeiture…”
Commonwealth v. Marshall, 698 A.2d 576 (Pa. 1997).
· cites it 10× “We granted allocatur to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain the Commonwealth's burden under 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a). [2] In forfeiture proceedings involving money, the Commonwealth bears the initial burden of…”
Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin, 880 A.2d 523 (Pa. 2005).
· cites it 4× “The Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act (“Forfeiture Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801 et seq., permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of the Controlled Substance Act, by providing as follows: Forfeitures generally.”
Pettit v. Namie, 931 A.2d 790 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
· cites it 6× “Forfeiture Section 6801 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801, in the Act commonly known as the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act (Forfeiture Act), [2] provides a detailed scheme for the seizure, custody and ultimate disposition of property subject to forfeiture.”
Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From Young, 160 A.3d 153 (Pa. 2017).
· cites it 3× “42 Pa.C.S. § 6801 (a)(6)(i)(C). Whether there exists a common law basis for forfeiture in Pennsylvania has not been definitively decided by our Court, and lower court pronouncements have been inconsistent.”
Commonwealth v. $11,600.00 Cash, U.S. Currency, 858 A.2d 160 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).
· cites it 5× “2d 509 (1994), since that case involved marijuana, and not cocaine? The Forfeiture Act, 4 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a), permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic…”
Commonwealth v. Hanson, 82 A.3d 1023 (Pa. 2013).
· cites it 3× “17 In this regard, the Commonwealth’s argument suggests, in *1035 substance, that close proximity creates a rebuttable presumption of control, similar to the operation of the Forfeiture Act, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a)(6)(h), as well as one facet of the federal sentencing…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(6)(ii) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin, 880 A.2d 523 (Pa. 2005).
“The Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act (“Forfeiture Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801 et seq., permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of the Controlled Substance Act, by providing as follows: Forfeitures generally.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a) — 16 cases
Commonwealth v. Marshall, 698 A.2d 576 (Pa. 1997).
“We granted allocatur to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain the Commonwealth's burden under 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a). [2] In forfeiture proceedings involving money, the Commonwealth bears the initial burden of…”
Commonwealth v. $11,600.00 Cash, U.S. Currency, 858 A.2d 160 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2004).
“2d 509 (1994), since that case involved marijuana, and not cocaine? The Forfeiture Act, 4 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a), permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic…”
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
“The legislature, to augment the protections against unlawful taking of personal property by the government enshrined in our state and federal constitutions, has crafted a substantive legal framework in the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 6801 (“Forfeiture…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(1) — 5 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(2) — 2 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(4) — 20 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(4)(i) — 1 case
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(4)(ii) — 3 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(4)(iii) — 2 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(4)(iv) — 3 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(5)(i)(c) — 1 case
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6) — 6 cases
Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin, 880 A.2d 523 (Pa. 2005).
“The Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act (“Forfeiture Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801 et seq., permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of the Controlled Substance Act, by providing as follows: Forfeitures generally.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(A) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Marshall, 698 A.2d 576 (Pa. 1997).
“We granted allocatur to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain the Commonwealth's burden under 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a). [2] In forfeiture proceedings involving money, the Commonwealth bears the initial burden of…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(h) — 4 cases
Commonwealth v. Hanson, 82 A.3d 1023 (Pa. 2013).
“17 In this regard, the Commonwealth’s argument suggests, in *1035 substance, that close proximity creates a rebuttable presumption of control, similar to the operation of the Forfeiture Act, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801(a)(6)(h), as well as one facet of the federal sentencing…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(i) — 5 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(i)(A) — 36 cases
Commonwealth v. $6,425.00 Seized from Esquilin, 880 A.2d 523 (Pa. 2005).
“The Controlled Substances Forfeitures Act (“Forfeiture Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801 et seq., permits the forfeiture of money exchanged for drugs or used or intended to be used to facilitate any violation of the Controlled Substance Act, by providing as follows: Forfeitures generally.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(i)(B) — 9 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(i)(C) — 19 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(i)(c) — 1 case
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(ii) — 25 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(6)(iii) — 2 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(a)(7) — 2 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(b) — 10 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(b)(1) — 3 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(b)(4) — 2 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(c) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
“The legislature, to augment the protections against unlawful taking of personal property by the government enshrined in our state and federal constitutions, has crafted a substantive legal framework in the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 6801 (“Forfeiture…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(d) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
“The legislature, to augment the protections against unlawful taking of personal property by the government enshrined in our state and federal constitutions, has crafted a substantive legal framework in the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 6801 (“Forfeiture…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(e) — 8 cases
Pettit v. Namie, 931 A.2d 790 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
“Forfeiture Section 6801 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6801, in the Act commonly known as the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act (Forfeiture Act), [2] provides a detailed scheme for the seizure, custody and ultimate disposition of property subject to forfeiture.”
Commonwealth v. Allen, 107 A.3d 709 (Pa. 2014).
“The legislature, to augment the protections against unlawful taking of personal property by the government enshrined in our state and federal constitutions, has crafted a substantive legal framework in the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act, 42 Pa. C.S. § 6801 (“Forfeiture…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(e)(2) — 3 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(f) — 3 cases
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(g) — 1 case
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 6801(j) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.