Coverage note: this corpus holds the
consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check
palegis.us.
§ 7310. Award of arbitrators.
(a) General rule.--The award of the arbitrators shall be in writing and signed by the arbitrators joining
in the award. The arbitrators shall deliver a copy of the award to each party personally
or by registered or certified mail, or as prescribed in the agreement to arbitrate.
(b) Time limitation.--The award shall be made within the time fixed by the agreement or, if not fixed by
the agreement, within such time as is ordered by the court on application of a party.
The parties by written stipulation may extend the time either before or after the
expiration thereof. A party waives the objection that an award was not made within
the time required unless he notifies the arbitrators of his objection prior to delivery
of the award to him.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Appeal of Upper Providence Police Delaware Cnty. Lodge 27, 526 A.2d 315 (Pa. 1987).
“§ 7305, (by the Court); also compare the time constraints imposed on the arbitrators within which to make their determination, Section 4(b) of Act 111 (within thirty days after the appointment of the third arbitrator) and Section 7310 of the UAA, 42 Pa.”
Goeller v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 568 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1990).
· cites it 2× “42 Pa.C.S. § 7310(a) (emphasis added). In reply, appellee argues that the neutral arbitrator was without the power to withdraw the award of the arbitrators after it had been issued.”
City of Pittsburgh, PA v. FOP, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 (T. Potts, Grievant) (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Specifically, Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 76 defines “signature” and provides that “when used in reference to documents produced by a court of the Unified Judicial System,” the term includes “a computer[-]generated signature or a signature created, transmitted,…”
DiDonato v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins., 1991 Phila. Cty. Rptr. LEXIS 55 (1991).
“It also alleges that the award failed to comply with the procedural requirements of 42 Pa.C.S. §7310. Following oral argument on the instant motion before this court, and after careful consideration of all issues raised, we agree and direct that a new panel b¿ convened under…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7310(a) — 2 cases
Goeller v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 568 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1990).
“42 Pa.C.S. § 7310(a) (emphasis added). In reply, appellee argues that the neutral arbitrator was without the power to withdraw the award of the arbitrators after it had been issued.”
City of Pittsburgh, PA v. FOP, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 (T. Potts, Grievant) (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2025).
“Specifically, Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 76 defines “signature” and provides that “when used in reference to documents produced by a court of the Unified Judicial System,” the term includes “a computer[-]generated signature or a signature created, transmitted,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.