Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9124 (2026)

 Form of demand.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 9124.  Form of demand.

No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing, alleging, except in cases arising under section 9127 (relating to extradition of persons not present in demanding state at time of commission of crime) that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime and that thereafter he fled from the state, and accompanied by a copy of an indictment found or by information supported by affidavit in the state having jurisdiction of the crime or by a copy of an affidavit made before a magistrate there, together with a copy of any warrant which was issued thereupon or by a copy of a judgment of conviction or of a sentence imposed in execution thereof, together with a statement by the executive authority of the demanding state that the person claimed has escaped from confinement or has broken the terms of his bail, probation or parole. The indictment, information or affidavit made before the magistrate must substantially charge the person demanded with having committed a crime under the law of that state, and the copy of indictment, information, affidavit, judgment of conviction or sentence must be authenticated by the executive authority making the demand.

 

Cross References.  Section 9124 is referred to in section 9127 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1990–2009 · leading case: Rivera v. Algarin, 350 F. App'x 703 (3rd Cir. 2009).
Rivera v. Algarin, 350 F. App'x 703 (3rd Cir. 2009). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9124. Pursuant to Pennsylvania law, Governor Rendell was required to accept that facially valid extradition request and issue a Governor’s Warrant.”
Rivera v. Algarin, 350 F. App'x 703 (3rd Cir. 2009). “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9124. Pursuant to Pennsylvania law, Governor Rendell was required to accept that facially valid extradition request and issue a Governor’s Warrant.”
Commonwealth v. Nation, 7 Pa. D. & C.4th 502 (1990). “” 42 Pa.C.S. §9124. (emphasis supplied) It is evident, therefore, that when extradition proceedings are ostensibly based on a parole violation, the substance of the demand and the crime for which the accused is being extradited is the criminal offense upon which he has been…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.