Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
This subchapter provides for an action by which persons convicted of crimes they did
not commit and persons serving illegal sentences may obtain collateral relief. The
action established in this subchapter shall be the sole means of obtaining collateral
relief and encompasses all other common law and statutory remedies for the same purpose
that exist when this subchapter takes effect, including habeas corpus and coram nobis.
This subchapter is not intended to limit the availability of remedies in the trial
court or on direct appeal from the judgment of sentence, to provide a means for raising
issues waived in prior proceedings or to provide relief from collateral consequences
of a criminal conviction. Except as specifically provided otherwise, all provisions
of this subchapter shall apply to capital and noncapital cases.
Commonwealth v. Bennett, 930 A.2d 1264 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 4דThis Court granted allowance of appeal to consider whether the Superior Court erred in quashing Appellant's appeal.”
Commonwealth, Aplt v. Descares, 136 A.3d 493 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 4ד42 Pa.C.S. § 9542. According to Appellee, the above language demonstrates that the legislature did not envision the PCRA as the only means of challenging the collateral consequences of a conviction.”
Commonwealth v. Hall, 771 A.2d 1232 (Pa. 2001). · cites it 6ד42 Pa.C.S. § 9542 (emphasis added). The plain language of the statute above demonstrates quite clearly that the General Assembly intended that claims that could be brought under the PCRA must be brought under that Act.”
Commonwealth v. Masker, 34 A.3d 841 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011). · cites it 9ד42 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 9542 (emphasis supplied).”
Commonwealth v. Lesko, 15 A.3d 345 (Pa. 2011). · cites it 4דThe terms of the PCRA do not specifically address the scenario presented here.”
Commonwealth v. West, 938 A.2d 1034 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 4ד" See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9542. The Commonwealth explains that in Lantzy we interpreted this excerpt from the PCRA to mean that there is no "bifurcated system of post-conviction review where some claims are cognizable under the PCRA while others are cognizable under various common law…”
Commonwealth v. Ford, 44 A.3d 1190 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2ד]" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9542. Had the legislature intended that claims of PCRA counsel ineffectiveness could not be raised for the first time on appeal, it could have expressly provided as such in the statute as other states have done.”
Commonwealth v. Taylor, 65 A.3d 462 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2דWe agree that Appellant’s writ of habeas corpus should be treated as a PCRA petition.”
Commonwealth v. Mason, L., Aplt, 130 A.3d 601 (Pa. 2015). · cites it 2ד8 The January 25, 2002 petition and several subsequent pleadings were captioned as “Petition[s] for Habeas Corpus Relief Pursuant to Article I, Section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and Statutory Post Conviction Relief Under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9542 et seq. and Consolidated…”
Commonwealth v. O'Berg, 880 A.2d 597 (Pa. 2005). · cites it 4ד42 Pa.C.S. § 9542; Grant, 813 A.2d at 734-38 .”
Commonwealth v. Haun, 32 A.3d 697 (Pa. 2011). · cites it 4ד42 Pa.C.S. § 9542 (“This subchapter provides for an action by which persons convicted of crimes they did not commit and persons serving illegal sentences may obtain collateral relief.”
Commonwealth, Aplt v. Dimatteo, P., 177 A.3d 182 (Pa. 2018). · cites it 6דAs alluded, while the courts were addressing the effect of Alleyne on sentences, challenged or not, on direct appeal, defendants sought to have Alleyne afford them relief via this Commonwealth’s sole means of obtaining collateral relief, filing a petition under the PCRA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.