Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9720.2 (2026)
Sentencing for trafficking of persons.
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 9720.2. Sentencing for trafficking of persons.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who commits a violation of 18 Pa.C.S. § 3011 (relating to trafficking in individuals) or 3012 (relating to involuntary servitude) while violating:
(1) 18 Pa.C.S. § 2901 (relating to kidnapping);
(2) 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121 (relating to rape); or
(3) 18 Pa.C.S. § 3123 (relating to involuntary deviate sexual intercourse);
shall be sentenced up to a maximum term of life imprisonment.
(Nov. 9, 2006, P.L.1340, No.139, eff. 60 days; July 2, 2014, P.L.945, No.105, eff. 60 days)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2021 · leading case: Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 204 A.3d 392 (Pa. 2019).
Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 204 A.3d 392 (Pa. 2019). “, 42 Pa.C.S. §9720.2 (providing that the sentence for human trafficking or human servitude “shall be .”
Com. v. Summers, B. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9720.2. Miller, however, effectively eliminated all sentencing options for juveniles who committed first- or second-degree murder in Pennsylvania.”
Com. v. King, I. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). “, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9720.2. Miller, however, effectively eliminated all sentencing options for juveniles who committed first- or second-degree murder in Pennsylvania.”
Com. v. Mull, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). “Rule 582(B) ____________________________________________ 8 The trial court imposed the maximum term of life imprisonment for human trafficking at 1762-2018 based on 42 Pa.C.S. § 9720.2. 9 We acknowledge that these appeals were technically premature because the clerk of the court…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.