Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721 (2026)

 Sentencing generally.

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

 

 

SUBCHAPTER C

SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES

 

Sec.

9721.  Sentencing generally.

9722.  Order of probation.

9723.  Determination of guilt without further penalty.

9724.  Partial confinement.

9725.  Total confinement.

9726.  Fine.

9727.  Disposition of persons found guilty but mentally ill.

9728.  Collection of restitution, reparation, fees, costs, fines and penalties.

9729.  Intermediate punishment (Repealed).

9730.  Payment of court costs, restitution and fines.

9730.1. Collection of court costs, restitution and fines by private collection agency.

9730.2. Sentence of community service.

9730.3. Counseling services for victims of sexual abuse (Repealed).

§ 9721.  Sentencing generally.

(a)  General rule.--In determining the sentence to be imposed the court shall, except as provided in subsection (a.1), consider and select one or more of the following alternatives, and may impose them consecutively or concurrently:

(1)  An order of probation.

(2)  A determination of guilt without further penalty.

(3)  Partial confinement.

(4)  Total confinement.

(5)  A fine.

(6)  (Deleted by amendment).

(7)  (Deleted by amendment).

(a.1)  Exception.--

(1)  Unless specifically authorized under section 9763 (relating to conditions of probation), subsection (a) shall not apply where a mandatory minimum sentence is otherwise provided by law.

(2)  A person may be eligible for the State drug treatment program or State motivational boot camp as described in 61 Pa.C.S. Ch. 39 (relating to motivational boot camp), even if a mandatory minimum sentence would otherwise be provided by law.

(3)  An eligible person may be sentenced to total confinement pursuant to subsection (a)(4) and a recidivism risk reduction incentive minimum sentence pursuant to section 9756(b.1) (relating to sentence of total confinement), even if a mandatory minimum sentence would otherwise be provided by law.

(b)  General standards.--In selecting from the alternatives set forth in subsection (a), the court shall follow the general principle that the sentence imposed should call for total confinement that is consistent with section 9725 (relating to  total confinement) and the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense as it relates to the impact on the life of the victim and on the community, and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant. The court shall also consider any guidelines for sentencing and resentencing adopted by the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing and taking effect under section 2155 (relating to publication of guidelines for sentencing, resentencing and parole, risk assessment instrument and recommitment ranges following revocation). In every case in which the court imposes a sentence for a felony or misdemeanor, modifies a sentence, resentences a person following revocation of probation or resentences following remand, the court shall make as a part of the record, and disclose in open court at the time of sentencing, a statement of the reason or reasons for the sentence imposed. In every case where the court imposes a sentence or resentence outside the guidelines adopted by the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing under sections 2154 (relating to adoption of guidelines for sentencing), 2154.1 (relating to adoption of guidelines for restrictive conditions), 2154.3 (relating to adoption of guidelines for fines), 2154.4 (relating to adoption of guidelines for resentencing) and 2154.5 (relating to adoption of guidelines for parole) and made effective under section 2155, the court shall provide a contemporaneous written statement of the reason or reasons for the deviation from the guidelines to the commission, as established under section 2153(a)(14) (relating to powers and duties). Failure to comply shall be grounds for vacating the sentence or resentence and resentencing the defendant.

(c)  Mandatory restitution.--In addition to the alternatives set forth in subsection (a) of this section the court shall order the defendant to compensate the victim of his criminal conduct for the damage or injury that he sustained. For purposes of this subsection, the term "victim" shall be as defined in section 479.1 of the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as The Administrative Code of 1929.

(c.1)  Mandatory payment of costs.--Notwithstanding the provisions of section 9728 (relating to collection of restitution, reparation, fees, costs, fines and penalties) or any provision of law to the contrary, in addition to the alternatives set forth in subsection (a), the court shall order the defendant to pay costs. In the event the court fails to issue an order for costs pursuant to section 9728, costs shall be imposed upon the defendant under this section. No court order shall be necessary for the defendant to incur liability for costs under this section. The provisions of this subsection do not alter the court's discretion under Pa.R.Crim.P. No. 706(C) (relating to fines or costs).

(d)  Detailed criteria.--With respect to each alternative the criteria to be considered by the court are set forth in this subchapter.

(e)  Term of imprisonment.--All sentences of imprisonment imposed under this chapter shall be for a definite term.

(Nov. 26, 1978, P.L.1316, No.319, eff. Jan. 1, 1979; Oct. 5, 1980, P.L.693, No.142, eff. 60 days; Dec. 19, 1990, P.L.1196, No.201, eff. July 1, 1991; July 11, 1991, P.L.76, No.13, eff. imd.; May 3, 1995, 1st Sp.Sess., P.L.999, No.12, eff. 60 days; Nov. 19, 2004, P.L.855, No.112, eff. 180 days; Sept. 25, 2008, P.L.1026, No.81, eff. 60 days; Oct. 27, 2010, P.L.931, No.95, eff. 60 days; Oct. 27, 2010, P.L.949, No.96, eff. 60 days; July 5, 2012, P.L.1050, No.122, eff. 60 days; Dec. 18, 2019, P.L.776, No.115, eff. imd.)

 

2019 Amendment.  Act 115 amended subsecs. (a), (a.1) and (b).

2010 Amendments.  Act 95 amended subsec. (a.1) and Act 96 added subsec. (c.1). Section 4(1) of Act 96 provided that subsec. (c.1) shall apply to costs imposed on or after the effective date of section 4(1).

1995 Amendment.  Act 12, 1st Sp.Sess., amended subsec. (c).

References in Text.  Section 479.1 of the act of April 9, 1929, P.L.177, No.175, known as The Administrative Code of 1929, referred to in subsec. (c), was repealed by the act of November 24, 1998, P.L.882, No.111, known as the Crime Victims Act. The subject matter is now contained in Act 111.

Cross References.  Section 9721 is referred to in sections 9728, 9775, 9802 of this title; sections 910, 2706, 2715, 2716, 3926, 5516 of Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses); section 3111.1 of Title 75 (Vehicles).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,446 cases (459 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Walls, 926 A.2d 957 (Pa. 2007).
Commonwealth v. Walls, 926 A.2d 957 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 14× “42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(a). In making this selection, the Sentencing Code offers general standards with respect to the imposition of sentence which require the sentencing court to impose a sentence that is "consistent with the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense as it…”
Commonwealth v. Dodge, 77 A.3d 1263 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 8× “Careful litigants should note that arguments that the sentencing court failed to consider the factors proffered in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721 does present a substantial question *1273 whereas a statement that the court failed to consider facts of record, though necessarily encompassing…”
Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 812 A.2d 617 (Pa. 2002). · cites it 6× “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b); see 204 Pa.Code § 303.”
Commonwealth v. Cartrette, 83 A.3d 1030 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “We add that circumscribing our scope of review would also curtail our ability to ensure that trial courts comply with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721 and 42 Pa.C.S. § 9771, and would change aspects of our standard of review.”
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ali, R., 149 A.3d 29 (Pa. 2016). · cites it 10× “1990), and citing 42 Pa.C.S. §9721 (“Sentencing generally”).”
Commonwealth v. Williams, 69 A.3d 735 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 9× “§ 9781(c) and (d), and 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b). Id. at 963. We also consider a sentence imposed following revocation of probation in light of the limitations set forth in 42 Pa.”
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 131 A.3d 604 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). · cites it 7× “1982), and section 9721 of the Sentencing Code, 42 Pa.C.S. §9721, is severely misplaced. For instance, section 9721(a) of the Sentencing Code mandates that in determining the sentence to be imposed, a trial court “shall, except as provided in subsection (a.”
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004). · cites it 2× “(2004), reproduced following 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9721 (Purdon Supp.”
Com. v. Pisarchuk, I., 306 A.3d 872 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). · cites it 8× ““When imposing a sentence, the sentencing court must consider the factors set out in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b), [including] the protection of the public, [the] gravity of [the] offense in relation to [the] impact on [the] victim[s] and [the] community, and [the] rehabilitative needs…”
Lackawanna Cnty. Dist. Attorney v. Coss, 532 U.S. 394 (2001). · cites it 4× “In calculating Coss' "prior record score"—one of two determinants of the applicable sentencing range, see 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721 (1998) (reproducing 204 Pa.”
Commonwealth v. Derry, 150 A.3d 987 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “Second, that the sentence was the product a “desire to punish;” and, third, that the aggregate sentence imposed was manifestly unreasonable in the circumstances of this case. Appellant contends his first claim satisfies the substantial question test because the trial court…”
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 159 A.3d 466 (Pa. 2017). · cites it 3× “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b). 10 As noted supra, Section 6138 delineates between CPVs, who commit crimes while on parole, and technical parole violators, who violate the terms and conditions of parole.”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(8) — 1 case
Com. v. Herrera, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(B) — 4 cases
Com. v. McCausland, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Com. v. Mennella, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Com. v. Grace, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
Com. v. Pompeii, N. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a) — 104 cases
Commonwealth v. Walls, 926 A.2d 957 (Pa. 2007). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(a). In making this selection, the Sentencing Code offers general standards with respect to the imposition of sentence which require the sentencing court to impose a sentence that is "consistent with the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense as it…”
Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 522 A.2d 17 (Pa. 1987).
Commonwealth v. Tessel, 500 A.2d 144 (Pa. 1985).
Hudson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 204 A.3d 392 (Pa. 2019).
Commonwealth v. Johnson-Daniels, 167 A.3d 17 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(1) — 9 cases
Com. v. Conley, B., 286 A.3d 313 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022).
Commonwealth v. Perdue, 564 A.2d 489 (Pa. 1989).
Com. v. Seals, J., 2026 Pa. Super. 29 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026).
Commonwealth v. Harrison, 661 A.2d 6 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1995).
Fritchman, R. v. Overmyer, M. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(2) — 9 cases
Com. v. Westlake, C., 295 A.3d 1281 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023).
Com. v. Thompson, E. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025).
Com. v. Hill, S. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
Com. v. Schultz, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(3) — 1 case
Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 163 A.3d 1057 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(4) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Postie, 110 A.3d 1034 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
Com. v. Feliciano, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Com. v. Biichle, F. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(5) — 5 cases
Com. v. Snyder, C., 251 A.3d 782 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Buck v. Beard, 834 A.2d 696 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003).
Com. v. Snyder, C., 2021 Pa. Super. 63 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021).
Com. v. Gary-Ravenell, K., 2019 Pa. Super. 289 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
Com. v. Gaither, K. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2026).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(6) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Wegley, 829 A.2d 1148 (Pa. 2003).
Com. v. Witts, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(a)(7) — 4 cases
Williams v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 68 A.3d 386 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).
B.J. Michael v. PBPP (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2020).
J.N. DeMaria v. DOC (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2019).
E.O. Buxo v. Ppb (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(b) — 1038 cases
Commonwealth v. Walls, 926 A.2d 957 (Pa. 2007). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(a). In making this selection, the Sentencing Code offers general standards with respect to the imposition of sentence which require the sentencing court to impose a sentence that is "consistent with the protection of the public, the gravity of the offense as it…”
Commonwealth v. Dodge, 77 A.3d 1263 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “Careful litigants should note that arguments that the sentencing court failed to consider the factors proffered in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721 does present a substantial question *1273 whereas a statement that the court failed to consider facts of record, though necessarily encompassing…”
Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 812 A.2d 617 (Pa. 2002). “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b); see 204 Pa.Code § 303.”
Commonwealth v. Williams, 69 A.3d 735 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 9781(c) and (d), and 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b). Id. at 963. We also consider a sentence imposed following revocation of probation in light of the limitations set forth in 42 Pa.”
Com. v. Pisarchuk, I., 306 A.3d 872 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023). ““When imposing a sentence, the sentencing court must consider the factors set out in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9721(b), [including] the protection of the public, [the] gravity of [the] offense in relation to [the] impact on [the] victim[s] and [the] community, and [the] rehabilitative needs…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(c) — 28 cases
Com. v. Risoldi, C., 238 A.3d 434 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Commonwealth v. Galloway, 448 A.2d 568 (Pa. 1982).
Com. v. Mulkin, O., 228 A.3d 913 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020).
Commonwealth v. Hall, 80 A.3d 1204 (Pa. 2013).
Commonwealth v. Mourar, 504 A.2d 197 (Pa. 1986).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(c)(2) — 1 case
Com. v. Glenn, C. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(d) — 3 cases
Com. v. McField, W. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2024).
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez, 2 Pa. D. & C.5th 251 (2008).
Commonwealth v. Grady, 4 Pa. D. & C.5th 108 (2008).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9721(e) — 3 cases
Buck v. Beard, 879 A.2d 157 (Pa. 2005).
Stewart v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 714 A.2d 502 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998).
Com. v. Stultz, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.