Pa. Cons. Stat. » 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. (JUDICIARY) / Chapter 97
Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes

42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9773 (2026)

 Modification or revocation of county intermediate punishment sentence (Repealed).

✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section PA-LEGpalegis.us JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 9773.  Modification or revocation of county intermediate punishment sentence (Repealed).

 

2019 Repeal.  Section 9773 was repealed December 18, 2019, P.L.776, No.115, effective immediately.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Concordia, 97 A.3d 366 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth v. Concordia, 97 A.3d 366 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 7× “8; indeed, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773 is analogous to 42 Pa.C.”
Commonwealth v. Banks, 198 A.3d 391 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 3× “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773 [.] This rule of resentencing is analogous to that set forth for resentencing following revocation of probation.”
Com. v. Conley, B., 286 A.3d 313 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, repealed by Act of Dec.”
Commonwealth v. Schmidt, 165 A.3d 1002 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9773.... Commonwealth v. Philipp, 709 A.”
Commonwealth v. Diaz, 191 A.3d 850 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9773. Each proceeding requires a hearing.”
George v. Beard, 824 A.2d 393 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003). “42 Pa. C.S. § 9773. Each proceeding requires a hearing.”
Commonwealth v. Philipp, 709 A.2d 920 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998). “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, Modification or revocation of intermediate punishment sentence, (b) Revocation.”
Commonwealth v. Smetana, 191 A.3d 867 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “42 Pa.C.S. § 9773. Each proceeding requires a hearing.”
Beahm v. Burke, 982 F. Supp. 2d 451 (E.D. Pa. 2013). “§ 9771, a county immediate punishment sentence, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, or state immediate punishment sentence, 42 Pa.”
Com. v. Flowers, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, a trial court may “revoke a sentence of county intermediate punishment upon proof of a violation of specific conditions of the sentence.”
Com. v. Cherry, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). · cites it 3× “Additionally, Subsection (c) requires that before doing so, the trial court must conduct a hearing “at which the court shall consider the record of the initial sentencing proceeding as well as the conduct of the defendant while serving a sentence of county intermediate…”
Com. v. Schmitz, W., Jr. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 3× “” 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773. This rule of resentencing is analogous to that set forth for resentencing following revocation of probation.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9773(a) — 3 cases
Commonwealth v. Concordia, 97 A.3d 366 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “8; indeed, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773 is analogous to 42 Pa.C.”
Commonwealth v. Hoover, T., Aplt. (Pa. 2020).
Com. v. Dotson, R. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014).
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9773(b) — 7 cases
Commonwealth v. Banks, 198 A.3d 391 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “" 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773 [.] This rule of resentencing is analogous to that set forth for resentencing following revocation of probation.”
Commonwealth v. Concordia, 97 A.3d 366 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2014). “8; indeed, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773 is analogous to 42 Pa.C.”
Com. v. Straile, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
Com. v. Flowers, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, a trial court may “revoke a sentence of county intermediate punishment upon proof of a violation of specific conditions of the sentence.”
Com. v. Cherry, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Additionally, Subsection (c) requires that before doing so, the trial court must conduct a hearing “at which the court shall consider the record of the initial sentencing proceeding as well as the conduct of the defendant while serving a sentence of county intermediate…”
— 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9773(c) — 3 cases
Com. v. Flowers, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017). “Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9773, a trial court may “revoke a sentence of county intermediate punishment upon proof of a violation of specific conditions of the sentence.”
Com. v. Cherry, A. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2018). “Additionally, Subsection (c) requires that before doing so, the trial court must conduct a hearing “at which the court shall consider the record of the initial sentencing proceeding as well as the conduct of the defendant while serving a sentence of county intermediate…”
Com. v. Walters, J. (Pa. Super. Ct. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.