Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes
42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 9798.3 (2026)
Global positioning system technology (Expired).
✓ current as of May 2026
Coverage note: this corpus holds the consolidated Pa.C.S. titles only. Unconsolidated P.S. statutes (UTPCPL 73 P.S. § 201-1, Liquor Code, wage payment laws) are not included; a miss here does not mean the statute does not exist. Check palegis.us.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
PA-LEGpalegis.us
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 9798.3. Global positioning system technology (Expired).
2012 Expiration. Section 9798.3 expired December 20, 2012. See Act 111 of 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2011–2020 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Elliott, 50 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012).
Commonwealth v. Elliott, 50 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012). “2006), that only the court, and not probation officers, can impose the terms of probation is in conflict with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9798.3,[ 2 ] enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan’s Law [sic] may…”
Com. v. Shires, D., II, 240 A.3d 974 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020). “Appellant was ordered to register pursuant to Megan’s Law in 2002. Order, 10/29/2002, at 1. However, our Supreme Court has rejected the notion that the Board has independent authority “to impose any condition of supervision it wishes upon a probationer subject to the sex…”
Commonwealth v. Elliott, 17 A.3d 331 (Pa. 2011). “2006) that only the court, and not probation officers, can impose the terms of probation is in conflict with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9798.3, enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan’s Law may impose…”
Com. v. Shires, D., II, 2020 Pa. Super. 238 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2020). “Appellant was ordered to register pursuant to Megan’s Law in 2002. Order, 10/29/2002, at 1. However, our Supreme Court has rejected the notion that the Board has independent authority “to impose any condition of supervision it wishes upon a probationer subject to the sex…”
Commonwealth v. Elliott, 17 A.3d 331 (Pa. 2011). “2006) that only the court, and not probation officers, can impose the terms of probation is in conflict with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9798.3, enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan’s Law may impose…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.